Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.os2.programmer.misc > #1828
| Subject | Re: C DLL |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.os2.programmer.misc |
| References | (1 earlier) <uqojbs$1ac8$1@dont-email.me> <ngSzN.229273$yEgf.198939@fx09.iad> <uqp3b8$3qu6$1@dont-email.me> <667AN.338523$Wp_8.44562@fx17.iad> <uqr0d2$i8f2$1@dont-email.me> |
| From | Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> |
| Message-ID | <U9cAN.71155$24ld.37302@fx07.iad> (permalink) |
| Date | 2024-02-17 16:27 -0800 |
Paul Edwards wrote: > On 18/02/24 02:42, Dave Yeo wrote: > >>> With Microsoft gone by OS/2 2.0, it would have been >>> IBM with CSET/2 that set any standard for a separate >>> DLL for the C runtime. >> >> Well, the equivalent of mingw is libcn, rebranded kLIBC which was a BSD >> rewrite of EMX GPL libc. Mostly used with GCC. >> The IBM compilers came with some libraries, single threaded and >> multi-threaded that I forget the name of and are usually statically >> linked in. >> Perhaps os2386.lib is what you are looking for? > > It depends whether os2386.lib has the function > printf etc that are very small and just create > a reference to something.dll to be resolved at > runtime, or whether they cause a large amount > of code to be linked in that gets resolved to > a DosWrite in doscalls.dll. Looking at a map file for an OW program using printf(), I see, g:\WATCOM/lib386/os2\clib3s.lib g:\WATCOM/lib386\math387s.lib G:\OS2TK45\lib\os2386.lib Note that I have the toolkit in the front of the set LIB statement as the toolkit is the official SDK. I assume with an OW program that it is clib3s.lib that has libc functions such as printf(). Really not sure about the IBM compilers. Most of my limited experience has been with GCC > > I am after the former, not the latter. > > But that does sound interesting. That single-threaded > library that is *usually* statically linked in - does > that mean it can be dynamically linked in if desired? Single threaded libs are more for DOS programs. I'm not sure which DLLs contain the libc functions if any. With GCC, it is libcXX.dll. > > If so, it resolves to what DLL, and does that DLL ship > with OS/2 even if you don't have the IBM compiler? Sometimes people forget statically link or include the DLL with programs that are compiled with IBM compiler, they don't run. So no. > >> At least in GCC land, there is crt0.o and similar to be statically >> linked in. > > I don't mind that. I just need the entire C90 > library - printf, strtol, etc, to reside in an > external DLL. It's normal to have a little bit > of code statically linked in that will set things > up to call routines in that external DLL. > I really don't know exactly how it works with the IBM compilers and libc. Hopefully someone else can chime in. You should install the toolkit, yum install os2tk45 os2tk45-books os2tk45-headers os2tk45-libs os2tk45-utils and perhaps os2tk45-ipf os2tk45-rc. Find it installed in %UNIXROOT%\usr\include\os2tk45, %UNIXROOT%\usr\lib\ and various other places in %UNIXROOT%\usr and favour the toolkit libs over the OW ones. Dave
Back to comp.os.os2.programmer.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 04:35 +0800
Re: C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 05:16 +0800
Re: C DLL Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2024-02-16 15:32 -0800
Re: C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 09:49 +0800
Re: C DLL Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 10:42 -0800
Re: C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-18 03:11 +0800
Re: C DLL Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 16:27 -0800
Re: C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-18 09:56 +0800
Re: C DLL xhajt03 <xhajt03@gmail.com> - 2024-02-18 07:33 -0800
Re: C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-19 10:41 +0800
Re: C DLL xhajt03 <xhajt03@gmail.com> - 2024-02-19 03:47 -0800
Re: C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-19 20:17 +0800
Re: C DLL Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2024-02-19 14:31 -0800
Re: C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-20 06:47 +0800
Re: C DLL Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2024-02-19 22:03 -0800
Re: C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-20 14:16 +0800
Re: C DLL Dave Yeo <dave.r.yeo@gmail.com> - 2024-02-16 15:28 -0800
Re: C DLL Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2024-02-17 10:11 +0100
Re: C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 18:00 +0800
Re: C DLL Paul Edwards <mutazilah@gmail.com> - 2024-02-17 18:03 +0800
csiph-web