Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #413564

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy, sci.physics, alt.privacy.anon-server, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject	Re: Smokers are smarter, I say.
Date	2017-05-07 12:53 -0700
Message-ID	<D534C955.A3EBF%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(12 earlier) <oenkq5$v7g$1@dont-email.me> <m2mugcl6q5l9lq5kri478f6mecp3kcm0sh@4ax.com> <oenn5t$v7g$2@dont-email.me> <WKJPA.79411$jP5.36201@fx03.iad> <oenpei$gm0$1@dont-email.me>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 5/7/17, 11:36 AM, in article oenpei$gm0$1@dont-email.me, "Sprang"
<spring@sprung.invalid> wrote:

> On Sun, 7 May 2017 14:32:19 -0400, Wolf K, after 15 edits, wrote this:
>> On 2017-05-07 13:57, Sprang wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Remember the global alarmists saying the Atlantic was gonna have increased
>>> intensity and frequency tropical systems?
>>> Didn't pan out.
>> [...]
>> 
>> Actually, I don't recall that.
>> 
>> https://www.gfdl.noaa.gov/historical-atlantic-hurricane-and-tropical-storm-re
>> cords/
>> 
>> Another article demonstrating the typical scientist's attempt to resist
>> confirmation bias:
>> https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn28389-did-climate-change-set-the-scene
>> -for-hurricanes-like-patricia/
>> 
>> And a neat graphic:
>> https://www.flickr.com/photos/idvsolutions/7840356344/sizes/l/in/photostream/
> 
> I'll probably *try* and look at some of that, but not today ;)
> Be forewarned:
> You won't sway me.

Of course... you have an agenda to push socialism of the cost of use of
ancient stores of carbon. Your political desire for socialism will override
your willingness to accept science.

> More people *work* in the field of climatology, meteorology than at any time
> in
> the past.
> No doubt all kinds of crap is being reported on. :)


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-06 14:32 +0100
  Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-06 09:26 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 12:38 -0400
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 17:16 +0000
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Beezel Bub <nunya@bizz.invalid> - 2017-05-07 11:24 -0600
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 17:57 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 14:32 -0400
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:36 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:53 -0700
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 21:51 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 15:02 -0700
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:59 -0700
        Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 14:18 -0400
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:24 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-05-07 15:18 -0400
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:35 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 13:06 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 18:50 +0000
            Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:12 -0700
              Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-05-07 19:48 +0000
                Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 12:55 -0700
          Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:56 -0700
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 11:57 -0700
    Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-05-08 00:09 +0100
      Re: Smokers are smarter, I say. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-05-07 16:24 -0700

csiph-web