Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #410326
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Poor "Snit" |
| Date | 2017-04-21 09:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51F7F23.A0A33%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (10 earlier) <odceeg$h8p$1@dont-email.me> <j8tjfcd65h0qkr37dt6drjbgvf8j28ej5l@4ax.com> <210420171013485537%nospam@nospam.invalid> <odd47m$qn1$1@dont-email.me> <210420171032322982%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 4/21/17, 7:32 AM, in article 210420171032322982%nospam@nospam.invalid, "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <odd47m$qn1$1@dont-email.me>, Peter Köhlmann > <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> wrote: > >>>>>> the real question is why anyone would willingly do that because by >>>>>> doing so, they won't be able to use the vast amount of mac/windows >>>>>> software that is not available in linux. it's a downgrade. >>>>> >>>>> Whereas windows or Mac will never run more than a small part of linux >>>>> software. The little bit which is ported makes only a small portion of >>>>> the available software >>>> >>>> It's an example of the closed, unimaginative mindset so typical of a >>>> Mac fan. He can't think of any reason why anyone would need more >>>> freedom. >>> >>> there is no lack of freedom on a mac. anyone can do whatever the hell >>> they want with it. >> >> Wrong. Anyone can do with it what apple allows him to do > > nonsense. apple does not limit what someone can do in any way. the only > limits are that of the user. > >> When apple once again decides to drop support for existing third party >> programs, as they have routinely done with new OSX versions, the users can't >> do absolutely nothing about that > > more nonsense. > > third parties support their own apps. it's no different on mac than any > other platform. There are programs that stop working on updates. This is less of a problem than in the past, but I will agree it happens more on macOS than I would like (or OS X in the past). >>> there's actually *more* freedom with a mac because a mac can natively >>> run all mac, windows, linux and bsd apps, the widest choice of any >>> platform. >> >> The Mac can run only a very small subset of linux programs. And not *all* of >> them. That is simply a lie > > nonsense again. the only apps that won't work are linux-specific, and > therefore not portable. they won't work on *bsd either. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Poor "Snit" Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-20 18:25 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 13:58 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 14:23 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 15:41 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 12:57 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 13:01 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 16:06 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-20 16:20 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 18:32 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 15:36 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 21:13 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 18:29 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-20 19:00 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 16:17 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-04-21 10:07 +0200
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 07:11 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:13 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-04-21 16:19 +0200
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:32 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:19 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 12:34 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:38 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:25 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:52 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 15:07 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:41 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:17 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:47 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 09:19 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:32 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 09:39 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-21 10:42 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:22 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:45 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:21 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 11:59 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:25 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:18 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:48 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 08:55 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 11:56 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 12:14 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 12:24 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-21 12:27 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 15:05 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:36 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 12:23 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:26 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:39 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:17 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:24 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:44 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:25 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:20 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:23 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:25 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:18 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:13 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:21 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2017-04-21 12:13 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 15:19 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 17:40 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 15:13 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:20 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:17 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2017-04-21 17:21 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 15:15 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:17 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-21 12:34 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 13:35 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 12:53 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 17:17 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 19:42 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 18:02 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 18:20 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 18:29 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 20:46 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 19:05 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2017-04-21 02:10 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 21:18 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2017-04-21 02:31 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 03:03 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-21 03:10 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 20:15 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 20:18 -0700
csiph-web