Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #410042
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech |
| Subject | Re: Poor "Snit" |
| Date | 2017-04-20 16:17 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D51E8FB7.A089B%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <D51E60AD.A0817%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <odb46d$85h$1@dont-email.me> <200420171620314053%nospam@nospam.invalid> <odbcnp$7ba$1@dont-email.me> <200420171900239610%nospam@nospam.invalid> |
Cross-posted to 4 groups.
On 4/20/17, 4:00 PM, in article 200420171900239610%nospam@nospam.invalid, "nospam" <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote: > In article <odbcnp$7ba$1@dont-email.me>, Jonathan N. Little > <lws4art@gmail.com> wrote: > >>> >>>>> Some DEs do not have the New Folder hot key work on the desktop and if you >>>>> go fast with your pressing of hot keys they can get "confused". Others, >>>>> such >>>>> as most Gnome based ones, handle it better. But here is the issue that was >>>>> being discussed: >>>> >>>> 'tis the beauty of Linux. Don't like that DE, then pick another to suit >>>> you. That is in contrast to MS or Apple where you are stuck with >>>> whatever they tell you to have. >>> >>> wrong. >> >> How so? > > neither apple nor microsoft stop anyone from running whatever they want. > > macos is unix under the hood and win10 has a bash shell which even > supports linux binaries. xwindows runs under it, as well as plenty > more. > > the real question is why anyone would willingly do that because by > doing so, they won't be able to use the vast amount of mac/windows > software that is not available in linux. it's a downgrade. For the most part agree, but I am very open to hearing about what benefits people think they have on Linux. So far, for the GUI, the big "benefits" are mostly these two: * Window widgets (things such as window shade and keeping the window on top) * Copy on select (a mixed blessing) To be fair it is hard to list many for Windows, but Windows has the advantage of having a massive amount of support from pretty much every company and LOTS of software that is designed for it and its UI. Meanwhile macOS has lots of tools to help boost productivity (and some absurd limits on what you can as well). -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again. <https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Poor "Snit" vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-04-20 01:33 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 18:58 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-20 18:42 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-19 21:16 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 19:42 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-20 18:30 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-19 22:16 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 00:27 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-19 23:10 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 09:35 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-20 21:45 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 18:59 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 19:06 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-21 10:30 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-21 06:37 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-21 10:31 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 08:49 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-21 23:02 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 20:18 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 20:37 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:07 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 09:15 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-21 18:16 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 11:25 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-21 17:42 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 10:54 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-21 18:21 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 11:33 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-21 19:34 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-21 22:02 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 19:18 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-22 06:10 +0000
Re: Michael Glasser is on crack, I assume. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 15:31 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Sandman <mr@sandman.net> - 2017-04-20 18:25 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 13:58 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 14:23 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 15:41 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 12:57 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 13:01 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 16:06 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-20 16:20 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 18:32 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 15:36 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" "Jonathan N. Little" <lws4art@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 21:13 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 18:29 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-20 19:00 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 16:17 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-04-21 10:07 +0200
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 07:11 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:13 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-04-21 16:19 +0200
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:32 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:19 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 12:34 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:38 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:25 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:52 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 15:07 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:41 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:17 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:47 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 09:19 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:32 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 09:39 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-21 10:42 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:22 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:45 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:21 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 11:59 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:25 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:18 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:48 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 08:55 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 11:56 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 12:14 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 12:24 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-21 12:27 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 15:05 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:36 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 12:23 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:26 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:39 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:17 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:43 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 09:24 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:44 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:25 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:20 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:23 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 13:25 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 11:18 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 10:13 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 08:21 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2017-04-21 12:13 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 15:19 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Silver Slimer <sl@im.er> - 2017-04-21 17:40 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 15:13 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:20 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:17 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 12:42 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Paul <nospam@needed.invalid> - 2017-04-21 17:21 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-21 15:15 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-21 18:17 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2017-04-21 12:34 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 13:35 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 12:53 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 17:17 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 19:42 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 18:02 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 18:20 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 18:29 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 20:46 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 19:05 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2017-04-21 02:10 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Marek Novotny <marek.novotny@marspolar.com> - 2017-04-20 21:18 -0500
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <"Steve Carroll"@noSPAM.none> - 2017-04-21 02:31 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" RonB <ronb02NOSPAM@gmail.com> - 2017-04-21 03:03 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-04-21 03:10 +0000
Re: Poor "Snit" Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2017-04-20 20:15 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-20 20:18 -0700
Re: Poor "Snit" Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-04-20 08:03 -0400
Re: Poor "Snit" Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-04-20 16:00 +0200
csiph-web