Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #408594

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution

From Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.sys.mac.system, alt.comp.os.windows-10, alt.cellular-phone-tech
Subject Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution
Date 2017-04-15 15:25 -0700
Message-ID <D517EBD7.9F313%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References (16 earlier) <op.yyjw0hjyjs98qf@red.lan> <D512A371.9E8E1%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yyjx9ibvjs98qf@red.lan> <D512C5CC.9E99A%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <op.yyq745m8js98qf@red.lan>

Cross-posted to 4 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 4/15/17, 1:49 PM, in article op.yyq745m8js98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 12 Apr 2017 01:41:32 +0100, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 4/11/17, 3:33 PM, in article op.yyjx9ibvjs98qf@red.lan, "James Wilkinson
>> Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> wrote:
>> 
>>>>>> Impossible. You can't make tech to meet halfways where one is
>>>>>> "additional" and the other is "subtractional" colors
>>>>>> 
>>>>> I you look at the RGB colour wheel, the printer inks are halfway between
>>>>> each. Why not exactly halfway?  They're halfway BECAUSE they're additional
>>>>> and subtractional.  Have a think about it.  Cyan ink is between green and
>>>>> blue on the wheel - it absorbs red.  Magenta ink is between red and blue,
>>>>> it absorbs green.  They should be precisely opposite.
>>>>> 
>>>> The CMYK gamut (color range) is not the same as the RGB... this adds
>>>> complications.
>>> 
>>> Funny how printers can produce any colour you see on the screen.
>> 
>> But they cannot: <https://www.mgxcopy.com/blog/?p=406>
>> 
>> About half-way down the page they show the color spaces of each. Here is a
>> larger copy: <http://intranet.mcad.edu/sites/default/files/picture3_1.png>.
>> 
>> Of course that image is not really very accurate -- after all, ALL the
>> colors on it are showing on the screen!
> 
> So you believe there are colours you can see in reality that are never shown
> on your screen?   Funny how I've never observed a photo on my screen that's
> missing a colour.
> 
>> But print it out and compare it to your screen and see what it looks like.
> 
> If what you're saying is true,

Try it.

> no printer can produce what you see on the screen, so this nonsense you're
> spouting about calibrated colour systems still won't work, as even pantone
> isn't as big as RGB.

How do you figure?

> I've printed it and it's identical to the screen

Low perception score for you. OK.

> , but to be fair the example
> you've given me is shit - just look at what colours are inside the CMYK area -
> completely lacking and much more limited than any printer, even cheap crap.
> There's virtually no green for a start.  Imagine a photo with some grassy
> fields, it certainly comes out bright green on a printer, but according to
> that image, there isn't much green available to CMYK.


-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

<https://youtu.be/H4NW-Cqh308>

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution "James Wilkinson Sword" <imvalid@somewear.com> - 2017-04-15 21:49 +0100
  Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 17:03 -0400
    Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:01 +0000
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-15 19:10 -0400
        Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:02 +0000
      Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 19:59 -0400
        Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Wolf K <wolfmac@sympatico.ca> - 2017-04-15 20:09 -0400
          Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-04-16 00:10 +0000
            Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Mark Lloyd <not@mail.invalid> - 2017-04-15 22:59 -0500
  Re: Apple told to warn against charging phone in bath after man's electrocution Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-04-15 15:25 -0700

csiph-web