Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #83765
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Date | 2017-03-27 17:53 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4FF0225.98660%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <ob9uta$q9q$6@dont-email.me> <D4FDD2EE.97727%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <t3oidctj5p18saan2ph0v39uo0do8t7qtm@4ax.com> <obbuv6$kmd$1@dont-email.me> <gkbjdc1gvbqh357rdjsgiegti03krrq44i@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 3/27/17, 5:39 PM, in article gkbjdc1gvbqh357rdjsgiegti03krrq44i@4ax.com, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> wrote: > On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 21:07:50 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> > wrote: > >> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 14:58:45 -0400, Sir Glug-glug the Wonder Puddle >> piddled: >> >>> On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:19:58 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Exactly... the question is about equal rights between people of >>>> different religions, NOT of people who are or are not citizens. >>> >>> Moron! There are equal rights ONLY by virtue of the US Constitution when >>> it comes to American citizens. >> >> WRONG! >> >> The Constitution does not limit most of the rights it grants to US >> citizens. In particular the free exercise and establishment clauses say >> the government shalt not favor any religion over any other (or atheism >> over any relgion, or religions over atheism for that matter). Not among US >> citizens, but *at all*. >> > > Since you're a Canadian, Paul, I don't suppose I should > be too hard on you for lacking understanding of the > US Constitution. So, FYI, it is not the Constitution > that grants rights. Rather it is God who grants > rights. The Constitution mostly LIMITS the powers of > the Federal government to diminish the God-given > U.S.citizen rights. Well, inalienable rights... coming from God, nature, the Invisible Green Dragon, or whatever else you want to assign it to. :) > And, it's the ESTABLISHMENT of religion. The federal > government may not establish a national religion, that's > all it says, you fool. Stop trying to foist off your > erroneous liberal interpret ion. It cannot promote one religion over another. The US is not a Christian nation any more than it is a Muslim nation. Or an atheist nation. >> And of course a judge said as much to Drumpf recently. No, wait, make that >> TWO judges. > > Two liberal judges who will both be overturned for > stupid stays based upon their own personal liberal > hogwash. Support that they will be overturned? -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:27 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Kachina Dancer <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-25 23:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 23:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:52 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 15:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:04 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:46 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 18:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:28 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-26 22:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-26 03:36 +0200
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:12 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:04 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:53 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-26 23:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 20:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:56 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 21:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:44 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:04 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Kids today make Jesus look like Trump. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 20:21 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 10:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:08 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom, WoD #1) - 2017-03-27 10:07 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-27 02:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:38 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 23:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:43 -0700
Both Michael Glasser and CaptainPissBucket have OCD, bad. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 20:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 16:00 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:21 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:17 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-28 00:31 +0200
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:31 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 15:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:50 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:24 -0700
Men were _not created equally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 20:51 -0700
Re: Men were _not created equally. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:44 -0400
Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:12 -0700
Re: Men were _not created equally. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-28 22:14 -0500
Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 20:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:53 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:30 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 19:42 -0700
Trump is more "golden calf" than Christian. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 13:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-28 01:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 03:49 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:34 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 19:39 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 20:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:21 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:46 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 16:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:01 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-27 16:16 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:50 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:13 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2017-03-26 22:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:28 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@qmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:32 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:26 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 02:48 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-27 07:22 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:37 -0700
csiph-web