Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ?

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	alt.checkmate, comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ?
Date	2017-03-27 17:47 -0700
Message-ID	<D4FF00CF.98659%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	(12 earlier) <D4FD8F80.97683%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <lpmidc9d8god7d30q6u0fr71i66nnua32f@4ax.com> <D4FEB919.9856E%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <LLeCA.3$_q7.2@fx01.iad> <ejteq4Fd713U6@mid.individual.net>

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 3/27/17, 2:33 PM, in article ejteq4Fd713U6@mid.individual.net, "vallor"
<vallor@cultnix.org> wrote:

> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 16:39:07 -0400, Silver-Tongued Heel wrote:
> 
>> Quote the Bible passages which promote war.
> 
> You know, for someone who claims to be a Christian, you seem quite
> ignorant of the contents of the Bible.
> 
> Just go read the book of Joshua.  Pay particular attention to 6:20-21:
> 
>  _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> So the people shouted, and the trumpets sounded. When they heard the
> blast of the trumpet, the people gave a great shout, and the wall
> collapsed. The people advanced into the city, each man straight ahead,
> and they captured the city. They completely destroyed everything in the
> city with the sword‹every man and woman, both young and old, and every
> ox, sheep, and donkey.
>  _ _ _ _ _ _ _
> 
> So by your standards, you're also a baby-killer.  How's that been working
> out for ya?

But, you see, one should only look at the "good" parts of the Bible and the
"bad" parts of the Quran.

Slimer wants to reject the OT (though then he focuses on the Ten
Commandments as if he does not even know they are from the OT) but there is
plenty of evil in the NT, too.

Does this mean all Christians are evil? Of course NOT. No more than the evil
nonsense in the Quran means all Muslims are (and, of course, Slimer thinks
he can quote and define what the Quran means but non-Christians cannot do so
with the Bible).

Just one hypocrisy after another to support his bigotry.

-- 
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.

They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.

Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 23:07 +0000
  Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-03-26 00:01 +0000
  Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 21:00 -0700
    Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Ms Kitty, DoW #6" <Ms.Kitty@dow.six> - 2017-03-26 00:03 -0500
    Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-26 13:04 +0000
      Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:13 -0700
      Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-27 04:09 +0800
        Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-03-26 17:55 -0400
        Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 15:32 -0700
          Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 02:56 +0800
            Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:27 -0400
              Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 04:34 +0800
            Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:42 -0700
              Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:39 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:52 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:35 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:50 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:35 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 14:40 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:33 +0000
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:47 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:22 +0800
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:48 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:19 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall,  Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:23 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:09 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:26 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:28 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:25 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:47 -0700
            Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:26 -0400
              Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:34 -0700
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:15 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:25 -0700
              No doubt about it now vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 20:44 +0000
                Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:25 -0400
                Re: No doubt about it now Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:41 +0000
                Re: No doubt about it now Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:20 +0800
                Re: No doubt about it now Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:29 +0000
                Re: No doubt about it now Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:41 +0800
                Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:47 -0400
                Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:22 -0700
                Re: No doubt about it now chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-28 06:59 -0500
                Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:58 -0400
                Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:10 -0700
                Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:27 -0700
                Re: No doubt about it now vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
            Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:25 +0000
              Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:08 +0800
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Ms Kitty, DoW #6" <Ms.Kitty@dow.six> - 2017-03-27 23:00 -0500
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:45 -0400
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-28 07:55 -0500
                Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:11 -0700
                String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-03-27 21:39 -0700
                String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me  @. - 2017-03-27 21:48 -0700
        Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:56 -0400
          Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:57 +0000
            Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:28 -0700
          Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:08 -0700
      Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-26 20:41 +0000
        Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-26 21:19 +0000
          Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 14:23 -0700
          Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-26 21:38 +0000

csiph-web