Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #83567
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate, comp.os.linux.advocacy, alt.usenet.kooks |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Date | 2017-03-27 12:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4FEB5F7.98564%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (8 earlier) <ob9n49$o3p$1@dont-email.me> <D4FDC921.97702%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <o4vgdchka9p08jcv74g8nmoahtqs8hgq51@4ax.com> <ejrgf3F1l31U2@mid.individual.net> <0inidclq943buq738tmm69c9a6mbi8ne3q@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 3/27/17, 11:52 AM, in article 0inidclq943buq738tmm69c9a6mbi8ne3q@4ax.com, "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> wrote: > On 27 Mar 2017 03:49:55 GMT, vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> wrote: > >> On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 22:47:44 -0400, Sir Gregory Hall, Esq. wrote: >> >>> On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 19:38:09 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>> <...> >>> >>>> Really we just look at the world in very different ways: I promote equal >>>> rights, you promote special entitlements. There is no real middle ground >>>> that can be found. >>> >>> And, that is a logical fallacy. Equal rights? >>> >>> Here's a clue. American citizens have certain Constitutional rights. >>> Muslim refugees have no such Constitutional rights because they are not >>> American citizens. Ergo, Muslim refugees do not and cannot have equal >>> rights just because you or some other liberal makes that absurd claim. >> >> Well Sir, I hate to disabuse you of your misconceptions, but you do seem >> to have some. >> >> "We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, >> that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, >> that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness." -U.S. >> Declaration of Independence > > Typical liberal argument that is easily debunked by > pointing out their abject ignorance of the written > word. > > Here's the rub, you fool. Unless the Declaration > states that all men are entitled to US citizenship, > you lose. Your lame attempt to maintain that any > human has US citizenship rights is delusional. Not everyone is a citizen... but when you try to give one religious group more rights than another, merely based on their religion, you are pushing the idea that one group deserves special rights... and of course you do this in a self-serving way. It, again, boils down to you wanting others to see Christians as precious snowflakes that deserve special entitlements... vs. those of us who want equal rights. NOTHING to do with your straw man of citizenship. Citizenship comes with privileges... sure. Nobody is saying it does not nor is anyone one (at least here) saying it should not. >> This is the theory of human rights we live with here in the U.S. -- that >> they are given by God Almighty. The Constitution _protects_ those rights >> by _limiting government_. > > True. But, it has nothing to due with Muslim refugee > immigration. Right: you moved the topic from denying Muslims equal rights based on their religion to a question about citizenship. >> Furthermore, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights provides >> international guidance on similar issues. And we could certainly have a >> conversation about certain Islamic countries' reticence to become >> signatories. But that is neither here nor there for the U.S., because >> the anti-establishment clause in the First Amendment is, as I said, a >> _limit on government_. > > But, what does limited government have to do with those > areas of the Constitution that grant immigration oversight > to the Federal? You debate almost as poorly as Snit does. If I debate so poorly then surely you can point out where I am wrong in saying people of different religions (or no religion at all) should have equal rights and that NO religion should be treated as a precious snowflake deserving of special entitlements. Keep in mind that is pretty much my whole point. >> Incidentally, it's for this reason that I hold the position that we >> shouldn't be sending _any_ foreign aid to theocracies, such as Saudi >> Arabia. I could rattle off a few more, but I think I would be even less >> popular than I am now if I did so. > > I'm sure you could rattle off a lot more but like > that which you rattled off above none of it is > likely germane to the debate. You moved goal posts to citizenship and then whine when people followed you. Odd. -- Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow superior by attacking the messenger. They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 16:22 +0000
He thought, " Parliament made my wife too free and independent ". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-25 11:42 -0700
Re: He thought, " Parliament made my wife too free and independent ". Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 18:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 14:14 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-25 19:52 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 18:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:14 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 23:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-03-26 00:01 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 21:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Ms Kitty, DoW #6" <Ms.Kitty@dow.six> - 2017-03-26 00:03 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-26 13:04 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-27 04:09 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-03-26 17:55 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 02:56 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 04:34 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:42 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:35 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:35 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 14:40 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:33 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:22 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:48 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:23 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:26 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:25 -0700
No doubt about it now vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 20:44 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:25 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:41 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:20 +0800
Re: No doubt about it now Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:29 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:41 +0800
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:47 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:22 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-28 06:59 -0500
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:58 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:10 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:27 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:25 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:08 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Ms Kitty, DoW #6" <Ms.Kitty@dow.six> - 2017-03-27 23:00 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:45 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-28 07:55 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:11 -0700
String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:39 -0700
String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:56 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:57 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:08 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-26 20:41 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-26 21:19 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-26 21:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 09:52 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-25 23:30 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-27 04:13 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 15:13 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 17:16 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:13 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:29 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:34 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:41 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:08 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-26 08:33 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:09 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 21:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 15:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:16 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 18:41 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 19:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 16:51 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-27 15:06 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 10:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 11:54 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-25 23:32 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 00:02 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:17 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-26 00:45 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:59 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:18 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:40 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:57 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 20:07 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:19 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:44 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 22:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:33 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:17 +0000
Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 18:00 -0700
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:05 -0400
Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 18:17 -0700
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:33 -0400
Now I see the light, it's raining cats and dogs. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Now I see the light, it's raining cats and dogs. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 23:02 -0400
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 21:10 -0400
Hippie Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-25 19:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:49 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:10 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:10 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 22:31 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:41 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:45 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:22 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 23:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:10 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:30 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:42 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:32 -0700
NOMINATION Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:32 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:27 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Kachina Dancer <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-25 23:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 23:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:52 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 15:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:04 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:46 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 18:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:28 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-26 22:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-26 03:36 +0200
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:12 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:04 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:53 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-26 23:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 20:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:56 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 21:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:44 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:04 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Kids today make Jesus look like Trump. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 20:21 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 10:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:08 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom, WoD #1) - 2017-03-27 10:07 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-27 02:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:38 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 23:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:43 -0700
Both Michael Glasser and CaptainPissBucket have OCD, bad. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 20:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 16:00 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:21 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:17 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-28 00:31 +0200
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:31 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 15:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:50 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:24 -0700
Men were _not created equally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 20:51 -0700
Re: Men were _not created equally. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:44 -0400
Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:12 -0700
Re: Men were _not created equally. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-28 22:14 -0500
Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 20:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:53 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:30 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 19:42 -0700
Trump is more "golden calf" than Christian. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 13:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-28 01:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 03:49 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:34 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 19:39 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 20:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:21 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:46 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 16:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:01 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-27 16:16 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:50 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:13 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2017-03-26 22:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:28 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@qmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:32 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:26 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 02:48 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-27 07:22 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:37 -0700
csiph-web