Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > alt.checkmate > #83536
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | alt.checkmate, comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? |
| Date | 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <D4FDD2BB.97726%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (9 earlier) <9eogdc9si6gt9kvrm7u8786t0ppesalg1d@4ax.com> <ob9rd2$q9q$1@dont-email.me> <thsgdc9rfrcps0108lv7a64nhq524r0kso@4ax.com> <D4FDCB53.9770F%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <pkvgdc5phblmqmrtbgjr1m2n8ri9htn2lb@4ax.com> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On 3/26/17, 7:58 PM, in article pkvgdc5phblmqmrtbgjr1m2n8ri9htn2lb@4ax.com,
"Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 19:47:31 -0700, Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote:
>
>> On 3/26/17, 7:04 PM, in article thsgdc9rfrcps0108lv7a64nhq524r0kso@4ax.com,
>> "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 27 Mar 2017 01:54:43 -0000 (UTC), Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sun, 26 Mar 2017 20:56:03 -0400, Sir Glug-glug the Wonder Puddle wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> bunch of ancillary crap
>>>>> mishmash of ancillary subsets.
>>>>> ancillary talk of *injustices*
>>>>
>>>> "Ancillary". Was that what came up in your word-a-day calendar today, "Mr.
>>>> Erudite"?
>>>>
>>>> <snicker>
>>>
>>> I see both you and Snit, being card-carrying liberals,
>>> use the same tactic of failing to address the core issue
>>> of a debate by sidestepping via the use of minutia that
>>> derails the debate.
>>>
>>> Shame on you! Your Snit reach around is laughably
>>> short-armed.
>>
>> I am happy to address the core issue: the issue here is you and some other
>> Christians want to push the unsupportable claim that the Bible is less
>> supportive of violence than is the Quran. This is, of course, not true...
>> but even if it was it would not be a good reason to accept the demands of
>> some Christians for special entitlements for people of their own religion
>> and bigotry against others.
>>
>> <http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124494788>
>> -----
>> "Much to my surprise, the Islamic scriptures in the Quran were
>> actually far less bloody and less violent than those in the Bible,"
>> Jenkins says.
>> ...
>> Violence in the Quran, he and others say, is largely a defense
>> against attack.
>>
>> "By the standards of the time, which is the 7th century A.D., the
>> laws of war that are laid down by the Quran are actually reasonably
>> humane," he says. "Then we turn to the Bible, and we actually find
>> something that is for many people a real surprise. There is a
>> specific kind of warfare laid down in the Bible which we can only
>> call genocide."
>> ...
>> In the end, the scholars can agree on one thing: The DNA of early
>> Judaism, Christianity and Islam code for a lot of violence. Whether
>> they can evolve out of it is another thing altogether.
>> -----
>
> You apparently chose to ignore my post which reproduced
> the many Quran verses which call for murder and mayhem
> to further Jihad.
Nope... but what I will not do is pretend that this shows the bible as being
any less violent or, really, that what you say of the Quran should be
accepted as absolute truth. From the same link, above:
-----
'Out Of Context'
That may be the popular notion of jihad, says Waleed El-Ansary, but
it's the wrong one. El-Ansary, who teaches Islamic studies at the
University of South Carolina, says the Quran explicitly condemns
religious aggression and the killing of civilians. And it makes the
distinction between jihad ‹ legal warfare with the proper rules of
engagement ‹ and irjaf, or terrorism.
"All of those types of incidences ‹ [Sept. 11], Maj. Nidal Hasan and
so forth ‹ those are all examples of irjaf, not jihad," he says.
According to the Quran, he says, those who practice irjaf "are going
to hell."
So what's going on here? After all, we all have images of Muslim
radicals flying planes into buildings, shooting up soldiers at Fort
Hood, trying to detonate a bomb on an airplane on Christmas Day. How
to reconcile a peaceful Quran with these violent acts?
El-Ansary says that in the past 30 years, there's been a perfect
storm that has created a violent strain of Islam. The first is
political: frustration at Western intervention in the Muslim world.
The second is intellectual: the rise of Wahhabi Islam, a more
fundamentalist interpretation of Islam subscribed to by Osama bin
Laden. El-Ansary says fundamentalists have distorted Islam for
political purposes.
"Basically what they do is they take verses out of context and then
use that to justify these egregious actions," he says.
-----
And there is this, about the Bible:
-----
It is called herem, and it means total annihilation. Consider the
Book of 1 Samuel, when God instructs King Saul to attack the
Amalekites: "And utterly destroy all that they have, and do not
spare them," God says through the prophet Samuel. "But kill both man
and woman, infant and nursing child, ox and sheep, camel and
donkey."
When Saul failed to do that, God took away his kingdom.
"In other words," Jenkins says, "Saul has committed a dreadful sin
by failing to complete genocide. And that passage echoes through
Christian history. It is often used, for example, in American
stories of the confrontation with Indians ‹ not just is it
legitimate to kill Indians, but you are violating God's law if you
do not."
Jenkins notes that the history of Christianity is strewn with herem.
During the Crusades in the Middle Ages, the Catholic popes declared
the Muslims Amalekites. In the great religious wars in the 16th,
17th and 19th centuries, Protestants and Catholics each believed the
other side were the Amalekites and should be utterly destroyed.
-----
You have shown something that is not in question: there are passages in the
Quran which can easily be seen as calls for violence (and with many of those
it is hard to see how they can be anything else but that). Sure. That is
true.
But you have not shown where it has more such calls than the Bible. And
given how the Bible is so much larger you are not likely to. Maybe we can
look at percentages? But even so people pick and choose the passages they
want AND choose how they wish to interpret them.
> While I took the time to post the over 500 Quran lines
> that call for murder and mayhem, you have yet to post
> even ONE of what you call *injustices* in the Bible.
I have posted links to far, far more verses in the Bible that call for
violence and the like, and pointed you to evidence, such as the above, which
shows the Bible to also be filled with calls for violence (it even claims
the Bible is MORE so).
But I am not going to say which has more evil in it. Who cares. Both have a
lot of calls for violence and a lot of calls for peace. That is simply a
fact.
When I do not accept your unsupported claim that is contrary to these facts
you complain you are not being listened to. Not true: I listen and I note
the objective facts which do not support your opinion.
Look below for a very specific example of you doing EXACTLY as I describe --
trying to pretend with NO evidence that the Bible is somehow less supportive
of violence than the Quran and then insisting I have "lost" even though I
have backed my claims well and you have offered NO support that the Bible is
one iota less violent than the Quran.
> The bottom line still remains that the core teachings of Islam call for murder
> and mayhem in the name of Jihad and a total intolerance for any other religion
> while all you manage to come up with is an unsubstantiated number of Biblical
> *injustices*.
>
> You lost the debate. Get over it and stop it with your lies.
--
Personal attacks from those who troll show their own insecurity. They cannot
use reason to show the message to be wrong so they try to feel somehow
superior by attacking the messenger.
They cling to their attacks and ignore the message time and time again.
Back to alt.checkmate | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 09:15 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Bill (not Jillians) Royal Order of the DoW #5" <noemail@none.not> - 2017-03-20 12:23 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 16:23 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-20 17:28 +0100
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 09:38 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-20 17:43 +0100
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 09:35 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-20 12:01 -0500
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> - 2017-03-20 18:31 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 19:57 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 18:17 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 22:37 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 18:54 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-20 23:13 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 19:36 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 01:10 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:09 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 19:21 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 00:54 +0100
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-22 02:11 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 19:22 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 03:12 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:28 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:50 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:49 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 09:29 -0500
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-20 17:25 -0600
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-20 19:43 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-20 20:02 -0400
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 01:12 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:56 -0700
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-20 22:18 -0600
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-21 16:55 +0000
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 12:17 -0500
Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 12:04 -0600
Kaczynski found his communist wonderland, prison. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-20 17:54 -0700
Re: Kaczynski found his communist wonderland, prison. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 09:14 -0500
Re: Kaczynski found his communist wonderland, prison. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:14 -0400
Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-21 12:20 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 15:35 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-21 13:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:16 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-21 13:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 20:57 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:21 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:19 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:07 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 14:11 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-22 16:07 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-22 01:27 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:17 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 20:26 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:46 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:00 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:23 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-21 16:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-21 20:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 16:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:42 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:22 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-21 16:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-21 16:51 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 15:58 -0500
Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-21 13:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:02 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:30 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 23:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:47 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-22 02:15 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-21 19:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-22 00:30 -0600
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 01:45 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-22 00:06 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Emmett BADASS Gulley <emmettgulley71@qmail.com> - 2017-03-22 15:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Rick Mathers <halfdick@invalid.invalid> - 2017-03-22 15:19 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Albätross <mäil.tö.älbätross@gmäil.cöm> - 2017-03-26 18:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Albätross <mäil.tö.älbätross@gmäil.cöm> - 2017-03-26 20:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 21:02 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-21 16:39 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-21 17:30 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-24 05:48 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-21 18:40 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Anglo Saxon <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2017-03-22 05:43 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 00:51 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-22 15:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-22 12:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-22 17:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-22 16:17 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 07:14 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 08:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 07:59 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 09:23 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 08:37 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-23 14:18 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-23 14:28 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 16:35 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-24 06:44 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 09:03 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 13:08 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 12:43 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:04 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:10 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:17 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:25 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:39 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:42 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:44 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not e ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:46 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not e ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 15:00 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 17:04 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 15:06 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 21:00 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 22:49 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 05:51 +0100
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-24 10:42 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly ❄ Snowflake ❄ Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 01:52 +0100
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-24 12:49 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:24 -0400
Re: ? Snowflake ? Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ? Snowflake ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:46 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 16:27 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 18:30 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 17:40 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-24 14:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-24 13:49 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-25 01:31 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-24 17:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 18:05 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-24 18:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 18:56 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:19 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:19 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-23 18:08 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 14:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-23 19:28 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 16:38 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 16:22 +0000
He thought, " Parliament made my wife too free and independent ". Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-25 11:42 -0700
Re: He thought, " Parliament made my wife too free and independent ". Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 18:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 14:14 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-25 19:52 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 18:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-25 22:03 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:14 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 23:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Sprang <spring@sprung.invalid> - 2017-03-26 00:01 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 21:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Ms Kitty, DoW #6" <Ms.Kitty@dow.six> - 2017-03-26 00:03 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-26 13:04 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-27 04:09 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2017-03-26 17:55 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 02:56 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 04:34 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:42 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:35 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:35 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 14:40 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:33 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:22 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:48 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:23 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:26 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:25 -0700
No doubt about it now vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 20:44 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:25 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:41 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:20 +0800
Re: No doubt about it now Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:29 +0000
Re: No doubt about it now Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:41 +0800
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:47 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:22 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-28 06:59 -0500
Re: No doubt about it now Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:58 -0400
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:10 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:27 -0700
Re: No doubt about it now vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 22:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:25 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-28 06:08 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Ms Kitty, DoW #6" <Ms.Kitty@dow.six> - 2017-03-27 23:00 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:45 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-28 07:55 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:11 -0700
String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:39 -0700
String Theory is Ptolemaic astronomy, repackaged. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:56 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:57 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:08 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-26 20:41 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-26 21:19 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 14:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-26 21:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:33 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Kadaitcha Man <nospam.nospam.nospam@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 09:52 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-25 23:30 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Bite My Shiny Metal Ass - 2017-03-27 04:13 +0800
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 15:13 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 17:16 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:13 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:29 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:34 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:41 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:08 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-26 08:33 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:09 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 21:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 15:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:16 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 15:32 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 18:41 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-25 22:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 19:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-25 16:51 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:26 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-27 15:06 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 10:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2017-03-27 18:41 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 11:54 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-25 23:32 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 00:02 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:17 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-26 00:45 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:59 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:18 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:25 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:40 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:57 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-25 20:07 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:19 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:44 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 22:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:33 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:17 +0000
Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 18:00 -0700
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:05 -0400
Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 18:17 -0700
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:33 -0400
Now I see the light, it's raining cats and dogs. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Now I see the light, it's raining cats and dogs. "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 23:02 -0400
Re: Everyone chooses the LeastWorst option and hopes for the best; Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 21:10 -0400
Hippie Jesus. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-25 19:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:49 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:10 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:10 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 22:31 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:41 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:45 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:00 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:22 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 23:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:10 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 20:30 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:42 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:32 -0700
NOMINATION Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 04:32 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 20:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 17:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-25 21:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 18:34 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:27 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Kachina Dancer <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-25 23:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 23:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:01 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:52 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 15:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:04 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 16:46 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? rachel <rachbl71@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 18:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:28 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-26 22:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:22 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-26 03:36 +0200
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 21:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-25 19:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 09:12 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-26 08:35 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 11:04 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 18:53 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:07 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 16:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-26 23:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 20:44 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 20:56 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-26 21:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:44 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:04 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:04 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:50 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Kids today make Jesus look like Trump. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 20:21 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 08:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 10:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:08 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? snipeco.2@gmail.com (Wader of Doom, WoD #1) - 2017-03-27 10:07 +0100
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2017-03-27 02:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:38 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:47 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 23:09 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:23 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-26 20:43 -0700
Both Michael Glasser and CaptainPissBucket have OCD, bad. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-26 20:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:02 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 16:00 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:21 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:42 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:17 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2017-03-28 00:31 +0200
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:31 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-27 15:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 19:50 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:54 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:24 -0700
Men were _not created equally. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 20:51 -0700
Re: Men were _not created equally. Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:44 -0400
Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 14:12 -0700
Re: Men were _not created equally. Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-28 22:14 -0500
Re: Men were _not created equally. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 20:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 21:07 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 20:39 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:53 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:05 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 21:15 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:27 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:30 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 18:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 21:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 19:42 -0700
Trump is more "golden calf" than Christian. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-27 21:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-28 08:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-28 13:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-28 01:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 03:49 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 20:59 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 06:17 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 14:52 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:28 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-27 15:34 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:47 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 19:39 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 12:48 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 20:38 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:58 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 21:21 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 17:46 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 16:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:35 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 22:01 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-27 16:16 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 17:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 13:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-27 16:50 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-27 14:15 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-29 10:10 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:11 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Tampon <letsplayfindthestring@bloody.net> - 2017-03-27 01:13 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 21:25 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:45 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 01:56 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:17 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.orq> - 2017-03-26 22:26 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:28 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@qmail.invalid> - 2017-03-26 22:32 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-26 22:37 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-27 02:26 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2017-03-27 02:48 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:53 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2017-03-27 07:22 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2017-03-26 19:37 -0700
Do you invite murders and rapists to your parties ? Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-23 12:09 -0700
Re: Do you invite murders and rapists to your parties ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 12:13 -0700
Re: Do you invite murders and rapists to your parties ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 19:20 +0000
Yesterday's religion is today's politics, and I'm agnostic. Jeff-Relf.Me @. - 2017-03-23 13:40 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> - 2017-03-23 18:09 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 14:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:23 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Libtard <libtard@sandernistas.invalid> - 2017-03-23 19:08 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 16:33 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:01 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:10 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:12 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:26 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:54 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 21:04 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 22:57 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 23:02 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:31 -0500
Re:Snowflake Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:49 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:53 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:18 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:29 -0400
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:32 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 21:34 +0000
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:40 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Janithor <Janithor@comcast.net> - 2017-03-23 14:42 -0700
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not ex actly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ ❄ Snowflake ❄ Fakey's Puppy Whistle Holder Emeritus 🐶笛 <root@127.0.0.1> - 2017-03-23 16:44 -0500
Re: ❄ Snowflake ❄ Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ❄ Snowflake ❄ Trump Team <TeamTrump@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 04:02 +0100
Re: ? Snowflake ? Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? ? Snowflake ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:24 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 21:30 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:55 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:22 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 18:02 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 18:13 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-23 18:43 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-24 02:05 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:12 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 21:12 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 18:19 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-24 08:24 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 17:55 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-25 10:43 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:14 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 17:20 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:52 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:50 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-23 19:44 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:51 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-24 10:04 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? " %" <persent@gmail.com> - 2017-03-24 08:52 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-24 17:57 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-24 02:05 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? pandora <pandora@peak.org> - 2017-03-24 10:08 -0500
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:20 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 15:57 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-23 17:51 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-24 00:19 +0000
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-23 17:36 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Skeeter <skeet@skeet.invalid> - 2017-03-22 16:09 -0600
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-22 18:49 -0700
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? Silver-Tongued Heel <sl@im.er> - 2017-03-23 08:59 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? kensi <kkensington01@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-23 12:58 -0400
Re: Kaczynski is not exactly a capitalist pig, right ? "Sir Gregory Hall, Esq." <greghall@yecht_master.fake> - 2017-03-23 14:21 -0400
NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish Nadegda <nad318b404@gmail.invalid> - 2017-03-21 01:04 +0000
Re: NOMINATION Re: In Gratitude to Carroll and the Fish "Checkmate, DoW #1" <Lunatic.Fringe@The.Edge> - 2017-03-20 18:58 -0700
(Thread has 510 articles, showing 500 — browse group in flat view)
csiph-web