Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.sys.mac.system > #83184

Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw

On 10/11/15, 9:41 PM, in article mvfdku$n28$1@news.albasani.net, "Nobody"
<nobody@invalid.com> wrote:

> On 10/7/2015 12:12 PM, Jolly Roger wrote:
>> Onion Knight <onionknight@linuxmail.org> wrote:
>>> 
>>> What's really funny is how these posters have appeared out of no place all
>>> around the same time and none of them have any posting history.
>>> Very interesting.
>> 
>> Yes, it's almost as if this thread is posted to another newsgroup or
>> something! Duh.
> 
> "Onion Knight" was busted as a "Snit" sock ages ago.

Nope. Just part of the "Everyone is Snit" gag that is old and dead. And was
never funny. 

With most of the idiotic accusations I do not even try to refute them. How
do you prove you are NOT doing as you are accused... and note there is no
evidence. But with Onion Knight he and I agreed to do a recording on Skype.
When THAT did not stop the idiocy we agreed to do ANOTHER with cc, who was
one of the main idiots accusing us of being the same person. Then Flatfish
jumped into the gag and said it STILL was not enough. Here, proof:

The recording: <http://tmp.gallopinginsanity.com/OKccSnit.mp3>

Let us review flatfish's claims and the actual data:

1) He claimed he made an audio analysis to back his beliefs:
   - He denied voice overlaps. Overlaps were shown and he changed his
     story saying they were added in post production.
   - He claimed I posted a WAV file when I did not.
   - His "analysis" was mostly "it is obvious" and "anyone can hear
     discrepancies", which is no analysis at all.
   - He noted "beeps ... typical of messaging programs" but these
     continued after Onion Knight was off Skype.
   - He claimed Onion Knight repeats "my stalker" but Onion Knight says
     "stalker" only once (12:24) and never "my stalker".
2) He claimed Onion Knight's ignorance showed he was a stooge:
   - No question has been quoted that Onion Knight did not answer.
   - On many question cc was lost. Flatfish rejected this as evidence of
     cc being a stooge, thus refuting his own line of thought.
3) He claimed Onion Knight not being a regular implies he is a sock:
   - There is no logic to this claim.
   - Onion Knight explained why he came to COLA and remained anonymous.
   - Even if Onion Knight was a sock there is no forensic link to me.
4) He claimed I modified my own voice and later had a "stooge" sound the
   same in real time with cc on the chat. This feat is beyond my sound
   engineering abilities. Flatfish shows extreme confidence in me but I
   simply am not that skilled.

In short:
* His "audio analysis" was flawed and failed to back his belief.
* His views about Onion Knight's knowledge failed to back his belief.
* His views about Onion Knight's "newness" failed to back his belief.
* His views about how the audio was made were flattering but unlikely.

As flatfish saw his evidence fall apart, he said:
    -----
    How you accomplished the con is not the really the point.
    You tried to pull a con and got caught.
    -----
If flatfish believes I pulled a con and was caught the *how* of my doing so
is of utmost importance. All he can honesty say is has has an intuition
that I committed a con but that he cannot figure out how and thus I was
*not* caught.

But as I said: he should believe what he wishes. I do not expect the lack of
evidence to convince anyone in COLA. The tendency in COLA for people to
believe things without evidence and even contrary to evidence is one of the
things that keeps COLA interesting to me.

Oh, and as always I am open to being shown where I am wrong. If you think
any of the above is in error please show it.

> So many "new" 
> posters suddenly appearing in COLA were quickly outed as "Snit" socks
> that he has resorted to cross-posting to lure in new nyms to camouflage
> his socks.

Everyone is Snit. HAHAHAHAHA.

Really, get some new material.

-- 
* OS X / Linux: What is a file?     <http://youtu.be/_dMbXGLW9PI>
* Mint MATE Trash, Panel, Menu:     <http://youtu.be/C0y74FIf7uE>
* Mint KDE working with folders:    <http://youtu.be/7C9nvniOoE0>
* Mint KDE creating files:          <http://youtu.be/N7-fZJaJUv8>
* Mint KDE help:                    <http://youtu.be/3ikizUd3sa8>
* Mint KDE general navigation:      <http://youtu.be/t9y14yZtQuI>
* Mint KDE bugs or Easter eggs?     <http://youtu.be/CU-whJQvtfA>
* Easy on OS X / Hard on Linux:     <http://youtu.be/D3BPWANQoIk>
* OS / Word Processor Comparison:   <http://youtu.be/w6Qcl-w7s5c>

Back to comp.sys.mac.system | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Nobody <nobody@invalid.com> - 2015-10-11 23:41 -0500
  Re: "Unhackable" Apple Confirms Malware-Infected Apps Found And Removed From Its Chinese App Store Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2015-10-11 22:09 -0700

csiph-web