Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #171574

Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined

From	Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined
Date	2013-04-02 07:04 -0700
Message-ID	<CD80337F.18568%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink)
References	<kiviju$gvo$1@dont-email.me> <CD78A179.181E0%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <kje3iq$vub$1@dont-email.me> <1e38v9jp83.fsf@news.eternal-september.org> <20130402104922.42@usenet.drumscum.be>

Show all headers | View raw

On 4/2/13 1:47 AM, in article 20130402104922.42@usenet.drumscum.be, "TomB"
<tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> wrote:

> On 2013-04-02, the following emerged from the brain of Hadron:
>> Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> writes:
> 
> 8<
> 
>>> And Android can be "desktop Linux" so your statement is both wrong
>>> and illogical.
>> 
>> No it cant.
> 
> It most definitely can. Or is this yet another thing you are not aware
> of?

It *can* be, but when speaking in generalities to refer to it as a mobile OS
is just fine. Lusotec is simply trying to get back at me for my noting how I
trust kernel.org about the product they offer more than I trust him.

-- 
"It is often hard to persuade the developers of one component to do what
improves the system as a whole rather than what will make their own
component more useful and successful." -- Richard Stallman

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2013-04-02 09:09 +0100
  Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 09:45 +0100
    Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 08:47 +0000
      Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-02 07:04 -0700
      Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined Homer <usenet@slated.org> - 2013-04-02 17:03 +0100
      Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-02 11:21 -0500
        Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2013-04-02 13:21 -0400
        Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 18:42 +0100
      Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined Hadron<hadronquark@gmail.com> - 2013-04-02 18:41 +0100
    Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-02 06:49 -0700
    Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined Lusotec <nomail@nomail.not> - 2013-04-03 01:05 +0100
      Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-02 17:29 -0700
      Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined William Poaster <wp@induh-vidual.net> - 2013-04-03 11:14 +0100
      Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2013-04-03 07:23 -0500
  Re: iPhone more vulnerable than Android, BB, and WP combined Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2013-04-02 06:44 -0700

csiph-web