Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #89453
| From | Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.embedded |
| Subject | Re: more troll spew |
| Date | 2012-02-15 16:28 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <CB618DB6.B39F8%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <ejnr09-5hi.ln1@spankydtr.localhost.net> <mkU_q.53932$kH7.7843@newsfe12.ams2> <jhh54p$311$1@dont-email.me> <nKW_q.131006$Ya5.90586@newsfe29.ams2> <jhhdqf$m33$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Peter Köhlmann stated in post jhhdqf$m33$1@dont-email.me on 2/15/12 4:06 PM: > 7 wrote: > >> Peter Köhlmann wrote: >> >> >>> That way you *hardcode* the number into the executeable. >>> Just because you use a #define does not mean that any code has been >>> changed You just get to change the value easier before compiling, and it >>> makes it less error prone if the value is used at several places. >>> >>> The only way *not* to hardcode any value is by reading it in via some >>> means. You still can have a hardcoded value in the binary, as long as you >>> have some means of overriding it during runtime without changing the >>> binary >>> >>> Your "way to avoid hardcoding" is bollocks and unworthy of a real >>> programmer >> >> >> Sheesh! >> What is your real name kernel developer Hadron Quack?! > > Idiot > >> And have you informed eternal-september.org you are impersonating >> Peter Köhlmann? Do you have their written permission to post >> or are you hoping to run away very fast when the police comes knocking? >> > > If you can't program yourself out of a wet paper bag, simply don't pretent > to be a programmer. > > Your attempts to pretend being a programmer are about as laughable as the > ones of Snit Michael Glasser pretending to know anything at all about linux > > You both know absolutely *nothing* about your chosen subject > And *none* of the herd will call Peter out on such BS. Ever. -- 🙈🙉🙊
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: Reading the Riot Act To ARM's developers Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@gmail.com> - 2012-02-14 20:06 -0800
Re: Reading the Riot Act To ARM's developers chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2012-02-15 07:20 -0600
Re: Reading the Riot Act To ARM's developers "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-02-15 11:20 -0500
Re: Reading the Riot Act To ARM's developers 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-02-15 20:15 +0000
Re: Reading the Riot Act To ARM's developers "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2012-02-15 15:26 -0500
Re: Reading the Riot Act To ARM's developers Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-02-15 21:38 +0100
more troll spew 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-02-15 22:56 +0000
Re: more troll spew Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-15 18:00 -0500
Re: more troll spew Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-02-16 00:06 +0100
Re: more troll spew Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2012-02-15 16:28 -0700
Re: more troll spew 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-02-16 19:48 +0000
Re: more troll spew Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-02-16 20:57 +0100
Re: more troll spew cc <scatnubbs@hotmail.com> - 2012-02-16 12:10 -0800
Re: more troll spew 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-02-16 20:43 +0000
Re: more troll spew Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2012-02-16 21:45 +0100
Re: more troll spew 7 <email_at_www_at_enemygadgets_dot_com@enemygadgets.com> - 2012-02-16 21:20 +0000
Re: more troll spew Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xzoozy.com> - 2012-02-16 16:57 -0500
Re: more troll spew Foster <frankfoster50@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-16 17:02 -0500
Re: more troll spew DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2012-02-16 20:12 -0500
Re: more troll spew Big Steel <SteelOne@SteelOne.com> - 2012-02-15 19:37 -0500
csiph-web