Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #91313
| From | Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: SyntaxError on progress module |
| Organization | Decebal Computing |
| References | <csjitvF6cptU1@mid.individual.net> <mailman.58.1432655950.5151.python-list@python.org> <csla4lFjduaU2@mid.individual.net> <87y4kammxa.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> <mailman.90.1432734279.5151.python-list@python.org> |
| Date | 2015-05-27 16:11 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <87siaim7p0.fsf@Equus.decebal.nl> (permalink) |
Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 15:44 CEST schreef Mark Lawrence: > On 27/05/2015 09:42, Cecil Westerhof wrote: >> Op Wednesday 27 May 2015 09:30 CEST schreef alb: >> >>> But here I have another question, as a python novice is there >>> really any reason for me to use any particular version of Python? >>> >>> Should I start directly with the newest? What about 2.7? >> >> In principal you should use the ‘latest’ 3. The only problem is >> that a lot of libraries are not converted to 3 yet. If you need one >> of those, then you have ‘no choice’ and have to use 2.7. But I >> would recommend to use ‘from __future__' to make the 2.7 code as >> much as possible 3 compliant. >> > > Please define "a lot" whilst bearing in mind green against red here > https://python3wos.appspot.com/ I just started using Python again and the first ‘real’ program I wrote I had to write with Python 2 because the needed library (libturpial, that is not listed on your link) works only with Python 2. A short search about which of the two to use gives similar answers to mine. And as far as I can see in my neighbourhood Python 2 is almost exclusively used because used libraries are only available in Python 2. This is not a scientifically substantiated argument, but for me good enough to use a lot. -- Cecil Westerhof Senior Software Engineer LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/cecilwesterhof
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
SyntaxError on progress module al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-05-26 15:48 +0000
Re: SyntaxError on progress module Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-26 16:59 +0100
Re: SyntaxError on progress module al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-05-27 07:30 +0000
Re: SyntaxError on progress module David Palao <dpalao.python@gmail.com> - 2015-05-27 09:47 +0200
Re: SyntaxError on progress module Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-27 18:22 +1000
Re: SyntaxError on progress module Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-27 10:42 +0200
Re: SyntaxError on progress module Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-27 14:44 +0100
Re: SyntaxError on progress module Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-27 16:11 +0200
Re: SyntaxError on progress module Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-27 15:51 +0100
Re: SyntaxError on progress module Cecil Westerhof <Cecil@decebal.nl> - 2015-05-27 17:18 +0200
Re: SyntaxError on progress module Mark Lawrence <breamoreboy@yahoo.co.uk> - 2015-05-27 21:03 +0100
Re: SyntaxError on progress module Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2015-05-28 11:39 +1000
Re: SyntaxError on progress module Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2015-05-27 02:27 +1000
Re: SyntaxError on progress module al.basili@gmail.com (alb) - 2015-05-27 07:24 +0000
csiph-web