Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #196914

Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read

From "Loris Bennett" <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read
Date 2024-10-30 16:57 +0100
Organization FUB-IT, Freie Universität Berlin
Message-ID <87r07xtwg7.fsf@zedat.fu-berlin.de> (permalink)
References <87plnj3te6.fsf@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <slrnvi2035.372.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu> <87bjz1vj2c.fsf@zedat.fu-berlin.de> <slrnvi4ksp.372.jon+usenet@raven.unequivocal.eu>

Show all headers | View raw


Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes:

> On 2024-10-30, Loris Bennett <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>> Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> writes:
>>> As per the docs you link to, the read() method only takes filename(s)
>>> as arguments, if you have an already-open file you want to read then
>>> you should use the read_file() method instead.
>>
>> As you and others have pointed out, this is indeed covered in the docs,
>> so mea culpa.
>>
>> However, whereas I can see why you might want to read the config from a
>> dict or a string, what would be a use case in which I would want to
>> read from an open file rather than just reading from a file(name)?
>
> The ConfigParser module provides read(), read_file(), read_string(),
> and read_dict() methods. I think they were just trying to be
> comprehensive. It's a bit non-Pythonic really.

OK, but is there a common situation might I be obliged to use
'read_file'?  I.e. is there some common case where the file name is not
available, only a corresponding file-like object or stream?

-- 
This signature is currently under constuction.

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read "Loris Bennett" <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de> - 2024-10-29 14:56 +0100
  Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2024-10-29 15:33 +0000
    Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read "Loris Bennett" <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de> - 2024-10-30 14:03 +0100
      Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2024-10-30 15:41 +0000
        Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read "Loris Bennett" <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de> - 2024-10-30 16:57 +0100
          Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2024-10-30 17:57 +0000
            Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read "Loris Bennett" <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de> - 2024-10-31 07:47 +0100
              Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read Jon Ribbens <jon+usenet@unequivocal.eu> - 2024-10-31 08:41 +0000
              Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read Karsten Hilbert <Karsten.Hilbert@gmx.net> - 2024-10-31 17:10 +0100
              Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2024-10-31 17:06 +0000
  Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' together with configparser.ConfigParser.read MRAB <python@mrabarnett.plus.com> - 2024-10-29 16:10 +0000
  Re: Using 'with open(...) as ...' (Posting On Python-List Prohibited) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-10-30 00:10 +0000

csiph-web