Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #101134

Re: We will be moving to GitHub

From Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net>
Newsgroups comp.lang.python
Subject Re: We will be moving to GitHub
Date 2016-01-02 11:48 +0200
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <87oad41fd4.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> (permalink)
References <n66kmg$ig$1@ger.gmane.org> <CAPTjJmq1Qevy7h4pqrQPobLRO-_ooLrXsZhK9Z9YCKPyFnxKsQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAKJDb-MFM6i+MMZXcPkV6x-rFnKr9Yxt4f3ne1dF3dk_SkoFpw@mail.gmail.com> <mailman.146.1451678991.11925.python-list@python.org> <5687718d$0$1612$c3e8da3$5496439d@news.astraweb.com>

Show all headers | View raw

Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info>:

> Oh, and talking about DVCS:
>
> https://bitquabit.com/post/unorthodocs-abandon-your-dvcs-and-retur
> n-to-sanity/

It's interesting how different opinions people can have about version
control. I also have mine.

I have seen the paradise, which was Sun's Teamware. I haven't tried
Bitkeeper, it's successor.

Having struggled with Perforce, SVN and CVS, I was hopeful Mercurial
would be everything Teamware was.

Unfortunately, it wasn't. The big disappointment was the treatment of a
repository as the atomic unit.

Git's no better than Mercurial. Also, Git is conceptually cluttered.

Well, Git and Mercurial are not all that bad as long as only a single
person is working on the repository at any given time and you have a
strictly linear version history. That would be advisable anyway as you
should have a separate repository for each conceptual unit.


Marko

Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Re: We will be moving to GitHub Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 07:09 +1100
  Re: We will be moving to GitHub Steven D'Aprano <steve@pearwood.info> - 2016-01-02 17:43 +1100
    Re: We will be moving to GitHub Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 18:12 +1100
    Re: We will be moving to GitHub Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-01-02 11:48 +0200
      Re: We will be moving to GitHub Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 21:29 +1100
        Re: We will be moving to GitHub Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-01-02 13:22 +0200
          Re: We will be moving to GitHub Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 22:40 +1100
            Re: We will be moving to GitHub Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-01-02 16:26 +0200
              Re: We will be moving to GitHub Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 01:38 +1100
                Re: We will be moving to GitHub Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-01-02 16:52 +0200
                Re: We will be moving to GitHub Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 02:12 +1100
                Re: We will be moving to GitHub Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-01-03 02:33 +0200
                Re: We will be moving to GitHub Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2016-01-03 11:42 +1100
                Re: We will be moving to GitHub Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-01-03 03:14 +0200
                Re: We will be moving to GitHub m <mvoicem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-04 11:13 +0100
                Re: We will be moving to GitHub Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2016-01-04 13:28 +0200
      Re: We will be moving to GitHub Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-04 23:53 +0100
    Re: We will be moving to GitHub Tim Chase <python.list@tim.thechases.com> - 2016-01-02 06:58 -0600
    Re: We will be moving to GitHub Michael Torrie <torriem@gmail.com> - 2016-01-02 20:24 -0700

csiph-web