Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register
Groups > comp.unix.programmer > #16954
| From | Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.unix.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? |
| Date | 2025-01-16 19:07 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <87o7068tmn.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <877c6wf5o2.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <rRQhP.65293$XfF8.23235@fx04.iad> <8734hjga0n.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <vm9err$35gfs$1@dont-email.me> <vmbe25$3v6su$4@paganini.bofh.team> |
antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) writes: [...] > On my Debian system PATH is: > > /usr/local/bin:/usr/bin:/bin:/usr/local/games:/usr/games > > '/bin' is a symlink to '/usr/bin', so AFAICS '/bin' could be > safely removed from the path. '/usr/local/games' and > '/usr/games' are empty and I do not intend to put anything > there, Games packaged by Debian will usually install their binaries/ programs in /usr/games. For as long as you don't actually install any games, /usr/games sitting at the end of the path will have no effect except increasing the time until a "command not found" error is displayed by an immeasurably small amount.
Back to comp.unix.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-14 11:14 +0100
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-01-14 13:55 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> - 2025-01-14 17:16 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-01-14 17:22 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-14 17:59 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> - 2025-01-14 19:23 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-01-14 22:17 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-01-14 23:24 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> - 2025-01-15 15:38 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-01-15 15:52 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> - 2025-01-15 19:19 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-16 00:03 +0100
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-01-15 23:14 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-19 13:50 +0100
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-01-15 23:26 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> - 2025-01-16 11:51 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-01-19 14:10 +0100
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> - 2025-01-19 20:36 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-19 15:55 -0800
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-01-16 17:01 +0000
Re: Default PATH setting - reduce to something more sensible? Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> - 2025-01-16 19:07 +0000
csiph-web