Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.lisp > #9680
| From | "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.lisp, comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: FreeDOS CL |
| Date | 2012-04-22 10:58 +0200 |
| Organization | Informatimago |
| Message-ID | <87mx64gn1w.fsf_-_@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> (permalink) |
| References | <bcdab23f-e7c3-4a83-8b77-7eacfa1cbd21@s7g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <51926928-fba1-4c8e-beb1-8af4cc2e73ba@v22g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> <jmvhoe$6nt$1@dont-email.me> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Tim Bradshaw <tfb@tfeb.org> writes:
> On 2012-04-21 22:19:34 +0000, BruceMcF said:
>
>> based on a
>> misconception that DOS itself was "not in use"?
>
> Well, it meets the "not used on anything you'd think of as a computer"
> criteria, I think (at least if qualified by "in bits of the world I
> care about", where "I" is the person who I think might think this, not
> me).
Actually, I got a FreeDOS CD from DELL last time my (then) company
bought DELL computers (without MS-Windows, that was a Linux place).
So I think we may assume there's a certain number of FreeDOS
installation running on modern hardware.
Let FreeDOS users port a CL implementation on it (I'd start trying with
clisp or ecl), and they'll be all set.
--
__Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/
A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.
Back to comp.lang.lisp | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: forth vs common lisp Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-18 18:50 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-04-19 04:08 +0200
Re: forth vs common lisp Ron Aaron <rambamist@gmail.com> - 2012-04-19 06:25 +0300
Re: forth vs common lisp Roelf Toxopeus <rt4all@notthis.hetnet.nl> - 2012-04-19 09:28 +0200
Re: forth vs common lisp Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-19 01:03 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp namekuseijin <namekuseijin@gmail.com> - 2012-04-19 12:10 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp Isaac Gouy <igouy2@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-20 08:53 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp kodifik <kodifik@eurogaran.com> - 2012-04-19 02:05 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp Andrew Haley <andrew29@littlepinkcloud.invalid> - 2012-04-19 04:29 -0500
Re: forth vs common lisp Tamas Papp <tkpapp@gmail.com> - 2012-04-19 10:15 +0000
Re: forth vs common lisp Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2012-04-19 08:45 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp Marco Antoniotti <marcoxa@gmail.com> - 2012-04-20 04:34 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp namekuseijin <namekuseijin@gmail.com> - 2012-04-19 11:53 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-04-19 14:15 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2012-04-19 16:06 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-04-20 05:24 +0200
Re: forth vs common lisp lynx <rinkasu@kaze.void.null> - 2012-04-20 04:17 +0000
Re: forth vs common lisp Don Geddis <don@geddis.org> - 2012-04-20 08:34 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp lynx <rinkasu@kaze.void.null> - 2012-04-20 16:54 +0000
Re: forth vs common lisp Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-04-20 17:03 +0000
Re: forth vs common lisp lynx <rinkasu@kaze.void.null> - 2012-04-20 17:56 +0000
Re: forth vs common lisp Don Geddis <don@geddis.org> - 2012-04-20 16:57 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp Tim Bradshaw <tfb@tfeb.org> - 2012-04-21 13:06 +0100
Re: forth vs common lisp Rupert Swarbrick <rswarbrick@gmail.com> - 2012-04-20 21:12 +0100
Re: forth vs common lisp Rugxulo <rugxulo@gmail.com> - 2012-04-20 13:20 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-04-20 23:14 +0200
Re: forth vs common lisp BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-04-21 11:04 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp Tim Bradshaw <tfb@tfeb.org> - 2012-04-21 22:12 +0100
Re: forth vs common lisp BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-04-21 15:19 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp Tim Bradshaw <tfb@tfeb.org> - 2012-04-22 01:01 +0100
Re: forth vs common lisp BruceMcF <agila61@netscape.net> - 2012-04-21 18:35 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp Tim Bradshaw <tfb@tfeb.org> - 2012-04-22 03:13 +0100
Re: FreeDOS CL "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-04-22 10:58 +0200
Re: FreeDOS CL "Pascal J. Bourguignon" <pjb@informatimago.com> - 2012-04-22 11:01 +0200
Re: FreeDOS CL quiet_lad <gavcomedy@gmail.com> - 2012-06-06 16:01 -0700
Re: forth vs common lisp Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-04-22 03:43 +0000
Re: forth vs common lisp Tim Bradshaw <tfb@tfeb.org> - 2012-04-21 13:02 +0100
Re: forth vs common lisp Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2012-04-21 16:29 +0000
csiph-web