Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #390192
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator |
| Date | 2025-01-29 16:00 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87ldut38zt.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <87a5bgsnql.fsf@gmail.com> |
Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> writes:
> JeanHeyd Meneide, a Project Editor for WG14, has just posted the results
> of a survey re. the preferred form of a new array size operator:
>
> -- https://thephd.dev/the-big-array-size-survey-for-c-results
Curious. The top objection to the usual macro solution is given as:
* double-evaluation of e.g. getting the size of the 1-d part of a 2-d
array int meow[3][4]; /* ... */ SIZE_KEYWORD(meow[first_idx()]);
Does the author not know that there is no evaluation of the operands of
sizeof in this example?
His "About" pages says "Project Editor for ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG14 -
Programming Languages, C".
--
Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Results of survey re. a new array size operator Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> - 2025-01-24 17:57 +1100
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-24 13:56 +0200
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-01-24 14:16 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-24 20:10 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-01-24 22:12 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-25 00:57 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-29 01:48 -0800
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-01-29 11:45 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-01-29 14:24 +0200
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-01-29 07:24 -0500
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-29 08:01 -0800
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-29 11:09 -0500
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-29 08:18 -0800
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-24 08:56 -0500
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-24 20:24 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-24 20:32 -0500
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-25 02:40 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-25 00:06 -0500
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-29 02:13 -0800
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-01-24 23:13 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-25 01:17 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-01-24 20:57 -0500
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-01-25 21:18 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 16:28 -0800
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-01-26 01:48 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-29 02:31 -0800
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-24 19:45 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Alexis <flexibeast@gmail.com> - 2025-01-25 09:39 +1100
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-25 01:16 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-29 02:17 -0800
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-29 02:19 -0800
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-01-29 16:00 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-29 18:01 +0100
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> - 2025-01-30 00:31 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-01-30 10:59 +0100
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-01-30 12:13 -0800
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-01-30 21:33 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-01-30 22:31 +0000
Re: Results of survey re. a new array size operator Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-02-18 19:46 -0800
csiph-web