Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #2880
| From | Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.python |
| Subject | Re: Argument of the bool function |
| References | <4d9f374b$0$12803$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <mailman.155.1302281042.9059.python-list@python.org> <4d9f7efc$0$1065$426a74cc@news.free.fr> |
| Date | 2011-04-09 07:57 +1000 |
| Message-ID | <87k4f4e78j.fsf@benfinney.id.au> (permalink) |
| Organization | Unlimited download news at news.astraweb.com |
candide <candide@free.invalid> writes: > Le 08/04/2011 18:43, Ian Kelly a écrit : > > In "bool(x=5)", "x=5" is also not an expression. It's passing the > > expression "5" in as the parameter x, using a keyword argument. > > You are probably right but how do you deduce this brilliant > interpretation from the wording given in the documentation ? By also learning the language syntax. ‘foo=bar’ within the parameters to a function call will always mean binding a value to a keyword argument. Just as the function docstring should not spend any space to explain what the parens mean, it should not spend any space to explain how to pass keyword arguments. -- \ “When [science] permits us to see the far side of some new | `\ horizon, we remember those who prepared the way – seeing for | _o__) them also.” —Carl Sagan, _Cosmos_, 1980 | Ben Finney
Back to comp.lang.python | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Argument of the bool function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-08 18:26 +0200
Re: Argument of the bool function Benjamin Kaplan <benjamin.kaplan@case.edu> - 2011-04-08 12:41 -0400
Re: Argument of the bool function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-10 14:54 +0200
Re: Argument of the bool function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-10 23:02 +1000
Re: Argument of the bool function Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-04-10 12:21 -0400
Re: Argument of the bool function "Colin J. Williams" <cjw@ncf.ca> - 2011-04-10 13:51 -0400
Re: Argument of the bool function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-11 09:46 +1000
Re: Argument of the bool function Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-04-11 16:00 -0700
Re: Argument of the bool function Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-04-25 16:29 +0200
Re: Argument of the bool function Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2011-04-26 05:33 +1000
Re: Argument of the bool function Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2011-04-25 16:26 -0700
Re: Argument of the bool function Steven D'Aprano <steve+comp.lang.python@pearwood.info> - 2011-04-26 02:38 +0000
Re: Argument of the bool function Thomas Rachel <nutznetz-0c1b6768-bfa9-48d5-a470-7603bd3aa915@spamschutz.glglgl.de> - 2011-04-25 23:28 +0200
Re: Argument of the bool function Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-25 17:44 -0600
Re: Argument of the bool function Mel <mwilson@the-wire.com> - 2011-04-08 16:42 +0000
Re: Argument of the bool function Ian Kelly <ian.g.kelly@gmail.com> - 2011-04-08 10:43 -0600
Re: Argument of the bool function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-08 23:32 +0200
Re: Argument of the bool function Ethan Furman <ethan@stoneleaf.us> - 2011-04-08 15:03 -0700
Re: Argument of the bool function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-09 00:59 +0200
Re: Argument of the bool function Lie Ryan <lie.1296@gmail.com> - 2011-04-09 15:45 +1000
Re: Argument of the bool function Grant Edwards <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2011-04-10 03:35 +0000
Re: Argument of the bool function rusi <rustompmody@gmail.com> - 2011-04-09 21:15 -0700
Re: Argument of the bool function Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2011-04-10 01:22 -0500
Re: Argument of the bool function Robert Kern <robert.kern@gmail.com> - 2011-04-09 18:22 -0500
Re: Argument of the bool function candide <candide@free.invalid> - 2011-04-10 02:33 +0200
Re: Argument of the bool function Ben Finney <ben+python@benfinney.id.au> - 2011-04-09 07:57 +1000
csiph-web