Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #174252
| From | Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: bart again (UCX64) |
| Date | 2023-09-06 18:52 -0700 |
| Organization | None to speak of |
| Message-ID | <87h6o63g31.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink) |
| References | <2773123015@f172.n1.z21.fsxnet> |
candycane@f172.n1.z21.fsxnet (candycane) writes:
> Ba> But it sounds like the C standard itself gives too much leeway in this
> Ba> matter anyway. There is apparently no one C language that says that
> Ba> 'int fred(void){}' must be illegal.
>
> I think you'd get a "reached end of non-void function" warning?
As we've been discussing, the issue is that the standard doesn't require
a diagnostic. Many compilers will issue a warning with the right
options.
You seem to be new here. Welcome!
It would be helpful if you'd follow the existing conventions for posting
followups:
- Don't delete attribution lines.
- Quote text with "> " (most newsreaders do this automatically).
- Use "-- " (the trailing space is significant) to mark your signature.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
Will write code for food.
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: bart again (UCX64) candycane@f172.n1.z21.fsxnet (candycane) - 2023-09-06 19:53 +1300
Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-09-06 18:52 -0700
Re: bart again (UCX64) Mike Terry <news.dead.person.stones@darjeeling.plus.com> - 2023-09-07 03:27 +0100
Re: bart again (UCX64) candycane@f172.n1.z21.fsxnet (candycane) - 2023-09-07 08:08 +1300
Re: bart again (UCX64) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-09-07 16:00 +0200
Re: bart again (UCX64) Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2023-09-07 15:08 +0100
Re: bart again (UCX64) candy <no@thanks.com> - 2023-09-08 02:09 +0000
Re: bart again (UCX64) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2023-09-08 00:12 -0400
Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 21:55 -0700
Re: bart again (UCX64) candy <no@thanks.com> - 2023-09-08 05:33 +0000
Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-09-07 23:04 -0700
Re: bart again (UCX64) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-09-08 09:46 +0200
Re: bart again (UCX64) Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-08 07:17 +0000
Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 02:42 -0700
Re: bart again (UCX64) candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> - 2023-09-08 06:55 -0500
Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 11:40 -0700
Re: bart again (UCX64) Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 20:17 +0100
Re: bart again (UCX64) Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 12:38 -0700
Re: bart again (UCX64) Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 21:11 +0100
Re: bart again (UCX64) candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> - 2023-09-08 18:16 -0500
Re: bart again (UCX64) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2023-09-09 01:17 -0400
Re: bart again (UCX64) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2023-09-09 01:16 -0400
Re: bart again (UCX64) Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 07:09 +0100
Re: bart again (UCX64) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2023-09-09 01:17 -0400
Recent spam on comp.lang.c (was Re: bart again (UCX64)) Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-09-08 12:22 +0000
Re: Recent spam on comp.lang.c (was Re: bart again (UCX64)) Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2023-09-08 13:32 +0000
How to change the Subject of a Usenet article (Was: Re: Recent spam on comp.lang.c) snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-09-08 15:50 +0100
Re: How to change the Subject of a Usenet article (Was: Re: Recent spam on comp.lang.c) candycanearter07 <no@thanks.net> - 2023-09-08 18:27 -0500
Re: How to change the Subject of a Usenet article snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-09-09 09:57 +0100
Re: How to change the Subject of a Usenet article (Was: Re: Recent spam on comp.lang.c) Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-09 03:16 +0000
Re: How to change the Subject of a Usenet article snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-09-09 09:57 +0100
Re: How to change the Subject of a Usenet article Kaz Kylheku <864-117-4973@kylheku.com> - 2023-09-09 15:10 +0000
Re: How to change the Subject of a Usenet article snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2023-09-09 16:26 +0100
Re: bart again (UCX64) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-09-08 14:47 +0000
csiph-web