Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > sci.electronics.basics > #54851
| From | Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | sci.electronics.basics, comp.sci.electronics, alt.electronics, sci.electronics.repair, sci.electronics.misc |
| Subject | Re: Capacitor rules |
| References | <87a60wwoqe.fsf@sc1f1dan.com> <78b15aeb-1328-36a0-5f88-63928a5a41c4@electrooptical.net> |
| Message-ID | <87h6dpo09x.fsf@sc1f1dan.com> (permalink) |
| Organization | Newshosting.com - Highest quality at a great price! www.newshosting.com |
| Date | 2024-06-19 07:32 +0000 |
Cross-posted to 5 groups.
Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> writes: > On 2023-03-01 09:06, Daniel wrote: >> Hi folks I'm really new with electronics. Doing a massive project for a >> retro computer system and, as a prong of this project I'm attempting to >> locate a modern equivalent of the board components. Enter the tantalum >> capacitor. Having gone to digikey, mouser, and newark none of them seem >> to have the item I'm looking for in stock. >> What are the rules about alternate values? The tantalum cap I'm >> looking >> for, according to the service manual, has the following rating: >> 1uf,10v, +-20%. >> The DIP style cap that the board uses isn't in stock anywhere so >> would I >> be able to substitute this cap for 1uf, 20v, +-20%? >> Thanks, >> Daniel >> > > Going up in voltage rating is fine. There might possibly be an issue > if the effective series resistance (ESR) is higher, but all solid > tants have highish ESR anyway, so it's unlikely to make a noticeable > difference. > > (Polymer tants are a different animal.) > > Cheers > > Phil Hobbs I know it's really late in the game but I wanted to thank everyone for their patient answers. Alot has been going on in real life and had to take a long long break from the newsgroups due to that, and as well as forgetting to check in. I'm catching up on hundreds of messages on newsgroups and on IRC and in the BBS scene. I did order my components though, but haven't made much traction on the project I posted about. Someday.
Back to sci.electronics.basics | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Capacitor rules Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2023-03-01 14:06 +0000
Re: Capacitor rules Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-03-01 09:33 -0500
Re: Capacitor rules Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2024-06-19 07:32 +0000
Re: Capacitor rules Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-06-19 23:38 +1000
Re: Capacitor rules Daniel <me@sc1f1dan.com> - 2024-06-26 02:11 -0700
Re: Capacitor rules Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-06-26 22:57 +1000
Re: Capacitor rules vjp2.at@at.BioStrategist.dot.dot.com - 2024-07-06 04:32 +0000
Re: Capacitor rules John Robertson <jrr@flippers.com> - 2024-07-07 23:44 -0700
Re: Capacitor rules Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2024-08-05 20:29 +1000
Re: Capacitor rules Jasen Betts <usenet@revmaps.no-ip.org> - 2023-03-02 00:17 +0000
Re: Capacitor rules Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-03-01 19:54 -0500
Re: Capacitor rules Phil Hobbs <pcdhSpamMeSenseless@electrooptical.net> - 2023-03-01 19:56 -0500
Re: Capacitor rules chuck <donnyduck@gmail.com> - 2023-03-13 10:28 -0400
csiph-web