Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #165604
| From | Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: operator precedence |
| Date | 2022-04-10 20:34 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <87bkx868cm.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | <thought-20220408125437@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <t2v61c$ej9$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Guillaume <message@bottle.org> writes: > Le 08/04/2022 à 14:00, Stefan Ram a écrit : >> Recently, I wrote: >> board & 1 << row * COLS + col > > If I saw this coming from someone in my team, I would probably fire > them. =) Why is this such a common trope? I doubt any country has such poor employment protection that anyone could be fired for such a thing so I assume it's just a rhetorical device to say "I really care about this issue", but surely there are other ways to do that without being so Donal^H^H^H^H Alan Sugar about it. Anyway, in reality I imagine you'd help your team mate write code that conforms to whatever standards your employer (or you, if you own the company) demands, including some answer to the thorny question below. > The readability rule that applies here is, if you need more than a few > seconds figuring out what a given statement exactly does, and may have > to even open the C standard to make sure, then it's badly > written. Rewrite it. The trouble with this (since I don't think you literally mean "you" here) is who is the typical reader? Do you aim for the lowest common denominator, or something in the middle? Does is vary by team? If it's a C compiler project, might you assume a higher standard of comprehension? -- Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: operator precedence Guillaume <message@bottle.org> - 2022-04-10 20:01 +0200
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-10 20:34 +0100
Re: operator precedence Guillaume <message@bottle.org> - 2022-04-11 20:52 +0200
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-11 21:27 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-14 13:38 +0200
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-14 14:07 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-18 14:00 +0200
Re: operator precedence Guillaume <message@bottle.org> - 2022-04-15 19:28 +0200
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-15 19:25 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-18 14:12 +0200
Re: operator precedence Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2022-04-18 16:38 +0000
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-18 19:20 +0200
Re: operator precedence Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2022-04-19 17:40 +0000
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-19 22:41 +0200
Re: operator precedence James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-18 23:08 -0400
Re: operator precedence Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-04-25 08:40 -0700
Re: operator precedence "james...@alumni.caltech.edu" <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-25 10:35 -0700
Re: operator precedence Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> - 2022-04-10 21:51 +0100
Re: operator precedence Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2022-04-11 11:35 +0200
Re: operator precedence gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2022-04-11 13:53 +0000
Re: operator precedence Guillaume <message@bottle.org> - 2022-04-11 20:36 +0200
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-14 13:14 +0200
Re: operator precedence Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-04-25 11:10 -0700
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-25 20:52 +0200
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-25 21:18 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-26 15:30 +0200
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-26 15:58 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-26 21:19 +0200
Re: operator precedence Sams Lara <samlara622@gmail.com> - 2022-04-27 02:15 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-27 09:13 +0200
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-27 19:43 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-28 10:09 +0200
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-28 10:44 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-28 11:59 +0200
Re: operator precedence Giovanni <lsodgf0@home.net.it> - 2022-04-28 12:29 +0200
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-28 12:56 +0200
Re: operator precedence Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 04:17 -0700
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-28 12:24 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-28 14:28 +0200
Re: operator precedence Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2022-04-28 14:00 +0000
Re: operator precedence Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2022-04-28 14:38 +0000
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-28 20:36 +0100
Re: operator precedence Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.com> - 2022-04-28 21:22 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-29 09:43 +0200
Re: operator precedence Kaz Kylheku <480-992-1380@kylheku.com> - 2022-04-28 20:51 +0000
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-29 10:04 +0200
Re: operator precedence Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2022-04-29 03:01 -0700
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-29 15:02 +0200
Re: operator precedence James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2022-04-29 10:48 -0400
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-29 17:29 +0200
Re: operator precedence bart c <bart4858@gmail.com> - 2022-04-26 14:30 -0700
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-27 00:00 +0100
Re: operator precedence David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2022-04-27 09:46 +0200
Re: operator precedence Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2022-04-27 00:10 -0700
Re: operator precedence scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2022-04-25 19:02 +0000
Re: operator precedence Ben <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2022-04-25 21:38 +0100
Re: operator precedence Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-04-25 22:22 -0700
csiph-web