Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register


Groups > comp.lang.c > #393185

Re: Regarding assignment to struct

From Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c
Subject Re: Regarding assignment to struct
Date 2025-05-05 13:43 -0700
Organization None to speak of
Message-ID <87bjs6hjpo.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> (permalink)
References (1 earlier) <vv4j9p$33vhj$1@dont-email.me> <86plgo7ahu.fsf@linuxsc.com> <vv9hu7$3nomg$1@dont-email.me> <87o6w7h2wn.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <868qnb5gg6.fsf@linuxsc.com>

Show all headers | View raw


Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes:
>> Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> writes:
>> [...]
>>
>>>   #include <stdio.h>
>>>
>>>   struct S { int a[10]; };
>>>
>>>   int main()
>>>   {
>>>     struct S a, b = { 0 };
>>>     int *pa, *pb, *pc;
>>>
>>>     pa = &a.a[5];
>>>     pb = &b.a[5];
>>>     pc = &(a = b).a[5];
>>>
>>>     printf("%p %p %p\n", pa, pb, pc);
>>>   }
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> I think that code has undefined behavior.
>
> Right.  [*]
>
>> (a = b) is an rvalue that refers to an object of type struct S with
>> temporary lifetime.  pc holds the address of a subobject of that
>> temporary object.  The object reaches the end of its lifetime at the end
>> of the evaluation of the full expression.  You then print its value.
>
> Even if the printf() statement were replaced by
>
>    (void)pc;
>
> the behavior would be undefined, because the pointer held in pc
> becomes indeterminate as soon as the statement containing the
> assignment to pc completes.

Agreed.

> [*] Assuming C11 semantics.  At best inadvisable under C99
> semantics, and a constraint violation under C90 semantics.

What C90 constraint does it violate?  Both gcc and clang reject it
with "-std=c90 -pedantic-errors", with an error message "ISO C90
forbids subscripting non-lvalue array", but I don't see a relevant
constraint in the C90 standard.

I know that C11 introduced "temporary lifetime" to cover cases
like this.  In C99, the wording for the indexing operator implicitly
assumes that there's an array object; if there isn't, I'd argue the
behavior is undefined by omission.  I'm not aware of any relevant
change from C90 to C99.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */

Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

Regarding assignment to struct Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-05-02 18:34 +0000
  Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-02 13:17 -0700
  Re: Regarding assignment to struct Barry Schwarz <schwarzb@delq.com> - 2025-05-02 13:35 -0700
    That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-05-02 20:44 +0000
      Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-05-03 01:13 +0000
        Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-03 02:28 +0000
        Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-03 06:17 +0200
        Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-05-03 04:31 +0000
          Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-05-03 05:11 +0000
            Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-05 12:30 +0200
              Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-05-05 18:47 +0000
          Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-04 11:05 -0700
        Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-05-03 00:47 -0400
        Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-04 10:59 -0700
          Re: That depends... (Was: Regarding assignment to struct) Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-05-04 18:16 +0000
  Re: Regarding assignment to struct antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-05-02 21:35 +0000
    Re: Regarding assignment to struct Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-05-03 01:43 +0000
  Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-03 01:14 -0700
    Re: Regarding assignment to struct Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-03 22:46 +0000
      Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-03 17:37 -0700
        Re: Regarding assignment to struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-05-03 23:38 -0400
          Re: Regarding assignment to struct gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-05-04 09:25 +0000
          Re: Regarding assignment to struct scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-05-04 14:27 +0000
            Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-04 18:45 +0200
          Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 13:20 -0700
            Re: Regarding assignment to struct scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-05-05 00:41 +0000
              Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 18:42 -0700
              Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 21:57 -0700
            Re: Regarding assignment to struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-05-04 21:08 -0400
    Re: Regarding assignment to struct Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-03 22:47 +0000
    Re: Regarding assignment to struct Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-03 22:46 +0000
    Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-04 06:48 -0700
      Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-04 22:22 -0700
        Re: Regarding assignment to struct Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-05-05 11:12 +0300
          Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-05 01:29 -0700
            Re: Regarding assignment to struct Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-05-05 12:01 +0300
              Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 07:14 -0700
              Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-05 08:45 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-05-05 20:20 +0300
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 22:26 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-29 05:11 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-05-29 12:57 -0400
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 13:27 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 17:04 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 17:53 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-06 11:35 +0200
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-29 05:19 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-29 21:05 +0200
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-05-06 17:36 +0000
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-06 20:46 +0200
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-05-06 19:22 +0000
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-07 09:37 +0200
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-29 05:49 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-29 16:33 +0200
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-29 21:20 +0200
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-05-29 21:15 +0000
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 14:54 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-05-30 14:29 +0000
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-30 10:50 +0200
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 13:06 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-29 05:21 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-05-29 16:43 +0200
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-29 05:14 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 13:56 -0700
          Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 07:03 -0700
        Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 01:26 -0700
          Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-05 10:14 -0700
            Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-08 12:45 -0700
              Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-08 22:20 +0200
        Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 01:34 -0700
          Re: Regarding assignment to struct Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-05-05 12:03 +0300
            Re: Regarding assignment to struct gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-05-05 11:30 +0000
            Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 13:32 -0700
              Re: Regarding assignment to struct Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-05-05 21:10 +0000
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 22:57 -0700
            Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 22:40 -0700
          Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 06:34 -0700
            Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 13:43 -0700
              Re: Regarding assignment to struct Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca> - 2025-05-06 19:06 +0000
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-06 13:21 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca> - 2025-05-07 19:09 +0000
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-07 14:23 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Nick Bowler <nbowler@draconx.ca> - 2025-05-08 12:58 +0000
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-07 21:17 -0700
              Re: Regarding assignment to struct Andrey Tarasevich <noone@noone.net> - 2025-05-29 05:36 -0700
                Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-29 14:36 -0700
        Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 07:56 -0700
          Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-05 20:00 +0200
        Re: Regarding assignment to struct NotAorB <atod101101@gmail.com> - 2025-05-12 16:38 -0400
  Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-03 11:46 +0200
    Re: Regarding assignment to struct Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-05-05 08:50 +0000
      Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-05 13:34 +0200
      Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-05 13:53 -0700
        Re: Regarding assignment to struct Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-05-06 07:16 +0000
        Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-06 11:46 +0200
          Re: Regarding assignment to struct Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-05-06 10:18 +0000
        Re: Regarding assignment to struct Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-05-06 16:34 +0300
  Re: Regarding assignment to struct Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2025-05-03 21:42 -0400
    Re: Regarding assignment to struct Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-05-04 11:01 +0300
      Re: Regarding assignment to struct Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-05-04 08:34 +0000
        Re: Regarding assignment to struct David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-05-04 14:06 +0200
      Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-05 21:25 -0700
      Re: Regarding assignment to struct Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2025-05-12 11:23 +0200
  Re: Regarding assignment to struct Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-05-04 07:49 -0700
  Re: Regarding assignment to struct Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-05-04 14:09 -0700

csiph-web