Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #172412
| From | Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail |
| Date | 2023-08-16 22:01 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <875y5ehfc2.fsf@bsb.me.uk> (permalink) |
| References | (7 earlier) <ubij3o$3afvd$1@dont-email.me> <9d8b343f-c61b-4bc6-b73e-a2df1ece7a63n@googlegroups.com> <ubj0i9$3ckl4$2@dont-email.me> <a5e01b33-26de-4bea-bd7b-c02bf3e5012dn@googlegroups.com> <fc09bb15-da9d-4d37-a419-362d33710a87n@googlegroups.com> |
fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> writes:
> środa, 16 sierpnia 2023 o 19:30:28 UTC+2 fir napisał(a):
>> środa, 16 sierpnia 2023 o 19:21:28 UTC+2 David Brown napisał(a):
>> >
>> > if ((ch >= '0') && (ch <= '9)) {
>> > return ch - '0';
>> > }
>> there is a question if not write this
>>
>> if(ch>='0' & ch<='9') return ch - '0';
>>
>> i mean use & instead of &&, this && is kinda nonsense (skipping
>> parenthesis i assume work coz im not sure, but better to assume and
>> debug imo)
>
> the decision not to use && for bitwiseand and || for bitwise was
> clearly idiotic and the question is who did it? ...normal and as & and
> normal or as | is quite standable
Clearly you don't know why this decision was made, yet you are sure it
was idiotic! That's not a good look.
You can find out the whole story with a bit of searching on the web
(keywords: Dennis Ritchie C history Bell Labs).
--
Ben.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 06:50 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 06:59 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 07:03 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2023-08-15 07:44 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-15 08:01 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2023-08-15 09:48 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-08-16 08:53 +0200
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 00:02 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-08-16 13:05 +0200
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-08-16 22:40 +0100
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2023-08-16 20:12 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2023-08-16 13:31 +0100
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-08-16 15:31 +0200
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-08-16 14:05 +0000
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-08-16 16:20 +0200
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-08-16 14:43 +0000
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-08-16 19:16 +0200
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2023-08-16 17:50 +0000
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-08-17 16:05 +0200
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Malcolm McLean <malcolm.arthur.mclean@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 07:35 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-08-16 19:21 +0200
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 10:30 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 10:33 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-08-16 22:01 +0100
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:09 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:29 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 14:14 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-08-17 00:52 +0100
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 17:07 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 12:52 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 13:13 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2023-08-16 21:52 +0100
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2023-08-16 18:25 +0100
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-08-17 16:15 +0200
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2023-08-17 10:44 +0300
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 08:17 +0000
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Spiros Bousbouras <spibou@gmail.com> - 2023-08-17 08:51 +0000
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Phil Carmody <pc+usenet@asdf.org> - 2023-08-17 15:11 +0300
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2023-08-17 21:20 +0200
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 13:26 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2023-08-16 21:51 +0100
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 15:35 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 08:14 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 08:34 -0700
Re: signed/unsigned - what will fail fir <profesor.fir@gmail.com> - 2023-08-16 08:48 -0700
csiph-web