Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.lisp > #59454
| From | Robert Brown <robert.brown@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.lisp |
| Subject | Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp |
| Date | 2024-03-15 20:23 -0400 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <871q8bja7c.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <874jd7z5nf.fsf@nightsong.com> |
Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> writes: > Is it really true that Common Lisp had both lexical and dynamic scope > in order to support older code that was written relying on dynamic > scope and was too hard to convert? No. I'd say Common Lisp has both lexical and dynamic scope because both are very useful. For instance, the Guice dependency injection framework for Java implements @RequestScoped settings, which are dynamically scoped and thread local. Guice wouldn't need that feature if Java natively supported dynamically-scoped variables.
Back to comp.lang.lisp | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
History of lexical scope in Lisp Paul Rubin <no.email@nospam.invalid> - 2024-03-15 11:55 -0700
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2024-03-15 16:05 -0600
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-15 22:26 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-15 23:04 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2024-03-16 00:46 -0600
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-16 07:27 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2024-03-16 23:13 -0600
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-17 05:37 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2024-03-17 16:42 -0600
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-17 23:05 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Jeff Barnett <jbb@notatt.com> - 2024-03-18 23:02 -0600
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-19 05:44 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp albert@spenarnc.xs4all.nl - 2024-03-18 14:47 +0100
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-18 19:51 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2024-03-18 20:33 -0400
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-16 16:54 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Robert Brown <robert.brown@gmail.com> - 2024-03-15 20:23 -0400
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-16 01:03 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Robert Brown <robert.brown@gmail.com> - 2024-03-16 11:32 -0400
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-16 21:59 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Kaz Kylheku <433-929-6894@kylheku.com> - 2024-03-16 02:37 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Didier Verna <didier@didierverna.net> - 2024-03-17 10:41 +0100
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-17 21:12 +0000
Re: History of lexical scope in Lisp Johanne Fairchild <jfairchild@tudado.org> - 2024-03-19 06:07 -0300
csiph-web