Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.std.c |
| Subject | Re: Invalid sample definition for errno |
| Date | 2022-11-20 05:26 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86sfidbvu7.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | <87r0xyl6nm.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> |
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: > A footnote in the section describing <errno.h> says: > > The macro errno need not be the identifier of an object. It might > expand to a modifiable lvalue resulting from a function call (for > example, *errno()). > > Footnotes are non-normative, and this one is presumably intended to be > informal, but that's not a valid macro definition for errno, both > because it's not fully protected by parentheses and because the function > can't be named "errno". I see no reason the function couldn't be named "errno".
Back to comp.std.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Invalid sample definition for errno Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-19 18:08 -0800
Re: Invalid sample definition for errno Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2022-11-20 05:26 -0800
Re: Invalid sample definition for errno Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2022-11-20 13:58 -0800
csiph-web