Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #392983
| From | Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: int a = a |
| Date | 2025-04-28 09:39 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <86frhs8ckt.fsf@linuxsc.com> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <87msdfscxj.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <vrjcd5$18m5n$1@dont-email.me> <87pliaqjb9.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <86a59clr3a.fsf@linuxsc.com> <87ldsw8zer.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> |
Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: > Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes: > >> Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> writes: >> >>> David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> writes: >>> >>>> [...]I believe it would be much simpler and clearer if attempting >>>> to read an uninitialised and unassigned local variable were >>>> undefined behaviour in every case. >>> >>> I probably agree (I haven't given it all that much thought), but >>> the committee made a specific decision between C90 and C99 to say >>> that reading an uninitialized automatic object is *not* undefined >>> behavior. I'm don't know why they did that (though, all else >>> being equal, reducing the number of instances of undefined >>> behavior is a good thing), but reversing that decision for this >>> one issue is not something they decided to do. >> >> Your description of what was done is wrong. It is still the case in >> C99 that trying to access an uninitialized object is undefined >> behavior, at least potentially, except for accesses using a type >> that either is a character type or has no trap representations (and >> all types other than unsigned char may have trap representations, >> depending on the implementation). A statement like >> >> int a = a; >> >> may still be given a warning as potential undefined behavior, even >> in C99. > > I had already mentioned that distinction earlier in the thread. Oh, I must have missed that. I don't remember seeing it in the message I was replying to. >> The mistake is thinking that UB for uninitialized access was >> removed in C99. It wasn't. Narrowed, yes; removed, no. > > Acknowledged. Good deal.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Bart's Language bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-17 23:51 +0000
Re: Bart's Language antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-18 12:17 +0000
Re: Bart's Language bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-18 13:54 +0000
Re: Bart's Language antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-18 15:10 +0000
Re: Bart's Language bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-18 15:45 +0000
Re: Bart's Language David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-18 17:31 +0100
int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-03-18 18:04 +0000
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-18 19:36 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-18 19:11 +0000
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-19 15:56 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-19 16:38 +0000
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-19 14:29 -0700
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-20 09:39 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-20 11:59 +0000
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-20 15:46 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 23:13 +0800
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-20 02:02 -0700
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-20 15:57 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-19 17:07 +0000
Re: int a = a Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-19 13:34 -0700
Re: int a = a Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-20 02:54 -0700
Re: int a = a Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 03:20 -0700
Re: int a = a David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-20 16:22 +0100
Re: int a = a Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 12:46 -0700
Re: int a = a David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-21 10:44 +0100
Re: int a = a Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-21 12:23 -0700
Re: int a = a David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-21 21:46 +0100
Re: int a = a Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-22 13:59 -0700
Re: int a = a Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-22 15:37 -0700
Re: int a = a Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-28 09:39 -0700
Re: int a = a Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-29 13:12 -0700
Re: int a = a Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-04-29 13:34 -0700
Re: int a = a David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-20 15:42 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-18 19:37 +0000
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-18 20:51 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2025-03-18 23:27 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-19 11:40 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-18 23:52 -0700
Re: int a = a Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-19 01:55 -0700
Re: int a = a Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-27 13:41 -0700
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-19 11:43 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) Rosario19 <Ros@invalid.invalid> - 2025-03-19 13:23 +0100
Re: int a = a (Was: Bart's Language) Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-20 01:32 -0700
Re: Bart's Language antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-20 22:55 +0000
Re: Bart's Language Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-20 16:22 -0700
Re: Bart's Language antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-22 14:37 +0000
Re: Bart's Language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-22 11:41 -0400
Re: Bart's Language antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-22 16:52 +0000
Re: Bart's Language James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-22 20:12 -0400
By definition... (Was: Bart's Language) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-03-23 17:20 +0000
Re: Bart's Language Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-04-27 11:53 -0700
Re: Bart's Language Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-04-27 14:29 -0700
Re: Bart's Language Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-01-06 14:04 -0800
Re: Bart's Language Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2026-01-06 17:12 -0800
Re: Bart's Language Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2026-03-06 09:04 -0800
Re: Bart's Language bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-18 22:19 +0000
Re: Bart's Language antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-20 22:38 +0000
Re: Bart's Language Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-20 23:45 +0000
Re: Bart's Language bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-21 00:56 +0000
Re: Bart's Language Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-21 17:47 +0000
Re: Bart's Language Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-22 07:12 -0700
Re: Bart's Language bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-21 00:33 +0000
csiph-web