Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > news.admin.peering > #3106
| Date | 2025-07-26 22:31 +0200 |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? |
| Newsgroups | news.admin.peering, rocksolid.nodes.help, rocksolid.nodes.announce |
| References | <104tuhe$2r60t$1@paganini.bofh.team> <687f44fc$0$61204$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <1062qth$v70$3@ereborbbs.duckdns.org> <20250726174923.3df96a16@ryz.dorfdsl.de> |
| From | "Billy G. (go-while)" <no-reply@no.spam> |
| Organization | github.com/go-while |
| Message-ID | <68853b35$1$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> (permalink) |
Cross-posted to 3 groups.
On 26.07.25 17:49, Marco Moock wrote: > On 26.07.2025 17:06 Uhr Kyonshi wrote: > >> On 7/22/2025 9:59 AM, Billy G. (go-while) wrote: >> >>> 4. Wait for pugleaf.net open source release! >> >> When is that gonna be actually? I wanted to put a web-frontend on one >> of my little servers and had planned to use rslight, but then the >> whole thing happened. > > Ask him directly, I don't see a public release yet and the software > itself seems to be not production-ready yet. > no ETA. It's done when it's done! still host breaking memory issues hidden in the code fetched and processed 800 GB of articles in 48h hours without crashing. sucking with 1000-2000 connections :D .. but mem goes up .. memory issue is maybe fixed now but found breaking bug in history / hashdb and need rebuild all now :D who wants, can join: https://discord.gg/rECSbHHFzp -- ....... Billy G. (go-while) https://pugleaf.net @Newsgroup: rocksolid.nodes.help
Back to news.admin.peering | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar
Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? Anonymous <anon@anon.anon> - 2025-07-12 10:21 -0500
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-07-12 20:55 +0200
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? Ray Banana <rayban@raybanana.net> - 2025-07-12 19:41 +0000
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? Retro Guy <retroguy@novabbs.com> - 2025-07-12 20:15 +0000
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? Soul Patch <soul.patch@127.0.0.1> - 2025-09-02 16:26 -0500
[addendum] Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? Soul Patch <soul.patch@127.0.0.1> - 2025-09-02 16:37 -0500
Re: [addendum] Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? "Billy G." <contact-5c2e-000@pugleaf.net> - 2025-09-03 00:44 +0100
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? Soul Patch <soul.patch@127.0.0.1> - 2025-08-04 18:23 -0500
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-08-05 20:14 +0200
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? "Billy G. (go-while)" <no-reply@no.spam> - 2025-07-22 09:59 +0200
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-07-22 14:36 +0000
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? Kyonshi <gmkeros@gmail.com> - 2025-07-26 17:06 +0200
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? Marco Moock <mm@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-07-26 17:49 +0200
Re: Is Rocksolid Light really compromised and insecure? "Billy G. (go-while)" <no-reply@no.spam> - 2025-07-26 22:31 +0200
csiph-web