Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Message-ID | <66a81d1f@news.ausics.net> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) |
| Subject | Re: X Window System boot stipple |
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| References | <6691a266$2$1439836$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <5FudnS1LIdXXJjv7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <v88dkg$hkg7$1@dont-email.me> |
| Date | 2024-07-30 08:52 +1000 |
| Organization | Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net |
John McCue <jmccue@magnetar.jmcunx.com> wrote: > > Right now, I am hoping the BSDs would get together to keep > X current, but I kind of doubt that will happen. What's "current"? The biggest issue would be changes to the operating systems that break old X code, and then obviously that will be easy for the BSDs to fix/avoid because they're the ones making the changes. The other would be compiler changes breaking builds, but again such people working on other big projects shouldn't struggle to tackle that. There's also graphics drivers, but then the X developers didn't have the muscle to keep up with them on their own before anyway, hence the widespread use of proprietary Nvidia drivers. Personally my modest graphics needs are served by the VESA or framebuffer drivers (I'm not sure if the latter exists on BSD), so I don't really care whether X is "current" driver-wise. Perhaps long-term the issue might be whether it's ported to new CPU architectures like RISCV? That's a long way off though, there might even be a replacement for Wayland by then. -- __ __ #_ < |\| |< _#
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
X Window System boot stipple Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> - 2024-07-12 21:38 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-13 16:16 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2024-07-13 20:29 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-13 23:45 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Javier <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-28 21:42 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-28 21:49 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Javier <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-28 23:46 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-29 00:19 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-29 11:25 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-29 21:47 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple John McCue <jmccue@magnetar.jmcunx.com> - 2024-07-29 15:48 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-29 21:47 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-07-30 08:52 +1000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-29 23:17 +0000
Re: X Window System boot stipple not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-07-31 08:49 +1000
Re: X Window System boot stipple Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> - 2024-07-29 19:27 +0000
csiph-web