Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.misc > #25383

Re: X Window System boot stipple

Message-ID <66a81d1f@news.ausics.net> (permalink)
From not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev)
Subject Re: X Window System boot stipple
Newsgroups comp.misc
References <6691a266$2$1439836$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <5FudnS1LIdXXJjv7nZ2dnZfqn_SdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <v88dkg$hkg7$1@dont-email.me>
Date 2024-07-30 08:52 +1000
Organization Ausics - https://newsgroups.ausics.net

Show all headers | View raw


John McCue <jmccue@magnetar.jmcunx.com> wrote:
> 
> Right now, I am hoping the BSDs would get together to keep
> X current, but I kind of doubt that will happen.

What's "current"? The biggest issue would be changes to the
operating systems that break old X code, and then obviously that
will be easy for the BSDs to fix/avoid because they're the ones
making the changes.

The other would be compiler changes breaking builds, but again such
people working on other big projects shouldn't struggle to tackle
that.

There's also graphics drivers, but then the X developers didn't
have the muscle to keep up with them on their own before anyway,
hence the widespread use of proprietary Nvidia drivers. Personally
my modest graphics needs are served by the VESA or framebuffer
drivers (I'm not sure if the latter exists on BSD), so I don't
really care whether X is "current" driver-wise.

Perhaps long-term the issue might be whether it's ported to new CPU
architectures like RISCV? That's a long way off though, there might
even be a replacement for Wayland by then.

-- 
__          __
#_ < |\| |< _#

Back to comp.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

X Window System boot stipple Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> - 2024-07-12 21:38 +0000
  Re: X Window System boot stipple Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-13 16:16 +0000
    Re: X Window System boot stipple Bob Eager <news0009@eager.cx> - 2024-07-13 20:29 +0000
  Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-13 23:45 +0000
  Re: X Window System boot stipple Javier <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-28 21:42 +0000
    Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-28 21:49 +0000
      Re: X Window System boot stipple Javier <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-28 23:46 +0000
        Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-29 00:19 +0000
      Re: X Window System boot stipple Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2024-07-29 11:25 +0000
        Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-29 21:47 +0000
    Re: X Window System boot stipple John McCue <jmccue@magnetar.jmcunx.com> - 2024-07-29 15:48 +0000
      Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-29 21:47 +0000
      Re: X Window System boot stipple not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-07-30 08:52 +1000
        Re: X Window System boot stipple Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-07-29 23:17 +0000
          Re: X Window System boot stipple not@telling.you.invalid (Computer Nerd Kev) - 2024-07-31 08:49 +1000
    Re: X Window System boot stipple Retrograde <fungus@amongus.com.invalid> - 2024-07-29 19:27 +0000

csiph-web