Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.sys.acorn.misc > #4064
| From | Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.acorn.misc |
| Subject | Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? |
| Date | 2012-03-08 12:11 +0000 |
| Organization | Russell Hafter Holidays |
| Message-ID | <526d38ac26see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <4d5b1aee-b4a7-4113-be6e-312a426d03c4@q18g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <2bf4ec6c52.martin@bach.planiverse.com> <526d2b50b9see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> <d7db326d52.martin@bach.planiverse.com> |
In article <d7db326d52.martin@bach.planiverse.com>, Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> wrote: > In message <526d2b50b9see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> > Russell Hafter News > <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> wrote: > > In article <2bf4ec6c52.martin@bach.planiverse.com>, > > Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> wrote: > >> I suppose what you want is not just a font that > >> contains the Latin-2 characters as you requested > >> above, but a Latin-2 font that is directly encoded in > >> Latin-2, so you can use it in applications that do not > >> know about encodings and simply open the font in its > >> default encoding. > > And, I assumed from the original posting, one that > > prints out in Latin-2. > Unless the font is broken it will print the way it > displays. In fact, for non-PostScript printing screen > display and printing are identical as far as the font is > concerned. PostScript is a different matter. A broken > font could display correctly but print incorrectly to > PostScript. Would this apply to PCL? > > For example, if an e-mail is received in iso-8859-2 (= > > Latin-2), Pluto displays the latin-2 characters > > correctly (I use Trinity as my standard font in Pluto), > > but what prints out is Latin-1. > That points to a fault in Pluto, not the font. Thank you for that. Given the sometimes strange things that Pluto does with UTF encoded e-mail (as we have discussed sometime earlier) perhaps I should not be surprised? Presumably the fact that cutting and pasting Latin-2 text into an Easiwriter document, using Trinity, gives me Latin-1 text, is down to EW not supporting font encodings? Any chance that that might change? :-) I have absolutely no idea hw difficult it is to implement. -- Russell http://www.russell-hafter-holidays.co.uk Russell Hafter Holidays E-mail to enquiries at our domain Need a hotel? <http://www.hrs.com/?client=en__blue&customerId=416873103>
Back to comp.sys.acorn.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? castlevarich <castlevarich@yahoo.co.uk> - 2012-03-07 09:25 -0800
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2012-03-07 23:24 +0100
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-08 09:45 +0000
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2012-03-08 12:07 +0100
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-08 12:11 +0000
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Grahame Parish <maillist.parish@millers-way.net> - 2012-03-08 12:43 +0000
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? "John Williams (News)" <UCEbin@tiscali.co.uk> - 2012-03-08 14:13 +0100
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2012-03-08 19:03 +0100
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Stuart <Spambin@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-08 12:56 +0000
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-08 17:10 +0000
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Martin Wuerthner <spamtrap@mw-software.com> - 2012-03-08 19:13 +0100
Re: Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Brian Carroll <bric-nospam@argonet.co.uk> - 2012-03-08 20:10 +0000
Latin 2 fonts on RISC OS anybody ???? Russell Hafter News <see.sig@walkingingermany.invalid> - 2012-03-08 21:23 +0000
csiph-web