Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: C unit testing and regression testing |
| Date | 2013-08-08 13:29 -0400 |
| Organization | Self |
| Message-ID | <5203D55E.9060202@verizon.net> (permalink) |
| References | <ku0i0g$e0v$1@dont-email.me> |
On 08/08/2013 12:46 PM, James Harris wrote: > What do you guys use for testing C code? From web searches there seem to be > common ways for some languages but for C there doesn't seem to be any > particular consensus. I'm surprised to hear that there's a consensus in any language. I'd expect any "one size fits all" approach to fail drastically. I realize that this is not what you were looking to discuss, but if you would, could you at least summarize what are those "common ways for some languages" are? > I am looking for an approach in preference to a package or a framework. > Simple and adequate is better than comprehensive and complex. For me, "simple" and "adequate" would be inherently conflicting goals, while "comprehensive" would be implied by "adequate" - but it all depends upon what you mean by those terms.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-08 17:46 +0100
Re: C unit testing and regression testing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-08-08 13:29 -0400
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2013-08-08 11:49 -0700
Re: C unit testing and regression testing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-08-08 16:33 -0400
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2013-08-08 14:55 -0700
Re: C unit testing and regression testing James Kuyper <jameskuyper@verizon.net> - 2013-08-08 18:35 -0400
Re: C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-09 07:34 +0100
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-09 18:08 +1200
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Malcolm McLean <malcolm.mclean5@btinternet.com> - 2013-08-09 03:16 -0700
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-09 18:04 +1200
Re: C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-09 07:30 +0100
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2013-08-08 12:54 -0500
Re: C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-09 07:37 +0100
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2013-08-09 07:46 -0500
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-08-08 18:55 +0000
Re: C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-09 07:58 +0100
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-09 19:54 +1200
Re: C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-13 12:35 +0100
Expect (was Re: C unit testing and regression testing) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-08-13 19:10 +0000
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-08-09 11:54 +0000
Re: C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-13 12:45 +0100
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-08-13 19:50 +0000
Re: C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-14 10:14 +0100
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-08-14 19:44 +0000
Re: C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-15 13:10 +0100
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-08-17 07:32 +0000
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-14 10:58 +1200
Re: C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-14 10:25 +0100
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-14 21:53 +1200
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-09 07:17 +1200
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Bart van Ingen Schenau <bart@ingen.ddns.info.invalid> - 2013-08-09 10:30 +0000
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-10 08:21 +1200
Re: C unit testing and regression testing <william@wilbur.25thandClement.com> - 2013-08-08 13:37 -0700
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-08-08 22:52 +0000
Re: C unit testing and regression testing "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2013-08-09 08:17 +0100
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-08-09 09:34 +0000
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2013-08-09 07:52 -0500
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Siri Cruise <chine.bleu@yahoo.com> - 2013-08-09 05:29 -0700
Re: C unit testing and regression testing Roberto Waltman <usenet@rwaltman.com> - 2013-08-11 20:19 -0400
Test-driven development (was Re: C unit testing and regression testing) Jorgen Grahn <grahn+nntp@snipabacken.se> - 2013-08-17 07:17 +0000
Re: Test-driven development (was Re: C unit testing and regression testing) Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-17 19:40 +1200
Re: Test-driven development (was Re: C unit testing and regression testing) Les Cargill <lcargill99@comcast.com> - 2013-08-17 11:40 -0500
csiph-web