Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #18010
| From | "Arne Vajhøj" <������ høj@1:261/38.remove-rj6-this> |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: multiple inheritance |
| Message-ID | <502FD853.56956.calajapr@time.synchro.net> (permalink) |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| References | <502943B6.56771.calajapr@time.synchro.net> |
| Date | 2012-08-18 18:36 +0000 |
| Organization | tds.net |
To: Lew
From: =?UTF-8?B?QXJuZSBWYWpow7hq?= <arne@vajhoej.dk>
On 8/12/2012 11:19 PM, Lew wrote:
> Arne Vajh-,j wrote:
>> Roedy Green wrote:
>>> 1. It has interfaces which gives much of the ability at lighter
>>> weight..
>>
>> Only for a very limited type of types (those with no implementation
>> at all).
>
> That is true, but "very limited" might be misconstrued as "not very
> useful". That Java limits multiple inheritance to interfaces is a design
> decision of the language, and confers advantages.
Indeed.
Implementation inheritance is not in fashion in Java, so interfaces is the
majority of cases.
A classic text:
http://www.artima.com/intv/gosling34.html
> There are vanishingly few cases where one cannot mix in implementation
> through a combination of composition and single inheritance of
> implementation ('class' parent types) to accomplish with equal facility
> what multiple implementation inheritance would. Avoiding the sorts of
> downsides mentioned upthread is the motivation.
There are some solutions to those problems. But Java was designed to be simple,
so we got what we got.
Arne
--- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Dada-1
* Origin: Prism bbs (1:261/38)
--- Synchronet 3.16a-Win32 NewsLink 1.98
Time Warp of the Future BBS - telnet://time.synchro.net:24
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
multiple inheritance "bob smith" <bob.smith@1:261/38.remove-s5y-this> - 2012-08-02 19:11 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "markspace" <markspace@1:261/38.remove-s5y-this> - 2012-08-02 19:11 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Gene Wirchenko" <gene.wirchenko@1:261/38.remove-s5y-this> - 2012-08-02 19:12 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Eric Sosman" <eric.sosman@1:261/38.remove-s5y-this> - 2012-08-02 19:11 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Joshua Cranmer" <joshua.cranmer@1:261/38.remove-s5y-this> - 2012-08-02 19:12 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-s5y-this> - 2012-08-02 19:12 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Roedy Green" <roedy.green@1:261/38.remove-s5y-this> - 2012-08-02 19:12 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Arne Vajhøj" <arne.vajhøj@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Lew" <lew@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-rj6-this> - 2012-08-18 18:36 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Leif Roar Moldskred" <leif.roar.moldskred@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "markspace" <markspace@1:261/38.remove-nlb-this> - 2012-08-13 18:36 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Arne Vajhøj" <������
høj@1:261/38.remove-rj6-this> - 2012-08-18 18:36 +0000
Re: multiple inheritance "Jan Burse" <jan.burse@1:261/38.remove-s5y-this> - 2012-08-02 19:12 +0000
csiph-web