Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.forth > #10642
| Date | 2012-03-29 20:45 -0600 |
|---|---|
| From | m II <C@in.the.hat> |
| Organization | tetrahedral |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.forth |
| Subject | Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology |
| References | <8e4d1e51-06cc-4003-9530-6e11bb23c2e8@i10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <jhnui6$io7$1@speranza.aioe.org> <59e870a4-a045-4a92-a641-38bea4b3acc3@pw4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <proto-14EB8F.15440818022012@news.panix.com> <9qbt1bFureU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Message-ID | <4f751e72@news.x-privat.org> (permalink) |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Paul E. Bennett wrote: > Walter Bushell wrote: > >> In article >> <59e870a4-a045-4a92-a641-38bea4b3acc3@pw4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>, >> >> Mentifex <mentifex@myuw.net> wrote: >> >>> "IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE COMMAND LINE" >> >> In my day Sonny we entered programs through the front panel in >> absolute octal machine code, no sissy assemblers for us and we >> liked it. >> >> See also, and a later more effete time "Mel the real >> programmer". >> >> Toggle switches and wiring boards. You haven't programmed until >> you've entered patches at least through the front panel. > > You had switches??!!!! My first programming task required a > soldering iron to put the diodes onto the matrix boards. ;> > > When I graduated to switches (my first 6800 project) my codes were > in hand crafted hex (about 4k of the stuff). Then we got to the > ASR33 teletype and paper tape (when we got clever and wrote the > names of progs on the leader). Also liked the way we could > programme the magnetic core memory and carry it across the factory > to plug it into the system that required it. > When *I* was apprenticing, I had to carry the Jaquard Loom cards across the mill floor to the Master. I'll never forget the day I dropped them and mistakenly thought the order of the cards didn't matter. On the bright side, I may have inadvertently invented psychedelic tapestries. My next job was less eventful and involved stables. mike -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPdR4pAAoJEDTMN7GV3zbX97kH/Ro0n23QDGoLAzJgo5WKsG2T 6/MfU3g12oeMiSe+sp1gyImml4KVIu8dMC/j1DXBuRClZA2pAwXEhXQST7Zz6fZ9 t11MXsrvt5SeFK9+bRp8LvAqCo/1MEJQolCv322Ky8daAwW2x534ggPfl2BJnv6U LxL365apKgSrQMFZhNETkzkMTWCfxr5+JV+wiNc7/jjoM5uPPmm43mzddh8k5bjW GQynzluovfD1v7YUP9LtzQA0HSGye8eNztCO4HLuZiAJLFhiTGOnP9AaqXZZ/H/D oLse6uz5vCAx+wu80TVPWhDxI+auC0RV/nDtF2Dqf+Jrjy4Kdtwie6oI8Ba/TPI= =z3Hd -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Mentifex <mentifex@myuw.net> - 2012-02-17 11:32 -0800
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 18:31 -0500
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-02-18 04:52 -0500
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-02-18 08:57 -1000
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2012-02-18 12:21 -0800
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 10:30 -0500
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 15:50 -0800
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Brad <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 16:30 -0800
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-02-18 05:28 -0500
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Mentifex <mentifex@myuw.net> - 2012-02-18 11:15 -0800
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2012-02-18 15:44 -0500
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-02-19 09:16 +0000
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "A. K." <minforth@arcor.de> - 2012-02-19 12:53 +0100
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-02-19 12:47 +0000
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 09:12 -0500
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-02-20 21:43 +0000
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-02-20 18:12 -0500
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-02-21 23:19 +0000
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2012-02-19 08:27 -0500
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "P.M.Lawrence" <pml540114@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 06:15 -0800
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2012-02-26 05:56 +1100
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-02-25 23:39 +0000
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-08 19:03 -0800
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 20:13 +0000
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology m II <C@in.the.hat> - 2012-03-29 20:45 -0600
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2012-02-26 09:43 +1100
Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-21 17:12 -0800
csiph-web