Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.forth > #10642

Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology

Date 2012-03-29 20:45 -0600
From m II <C@in.the.hat>
Organization tetrahedral
Newsgroups comp.lang.forth
Subject Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology
References <8e4d1e51-06cc-4003-9530-6e11bb23c2e8@i10g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <jhnui6$io7$1@speranza.aioe.org> <59e870a4-a045-4a92-a641-38bea4b3acc3@pw4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com> <proto-14EB8F.15440818022012@news.panix.com> <9qbt1bFureU1@mid.individual.net>
Message-ID <4f751e72@news.x-privat.org> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Paul E. Bennett wrote:
> Walter Bushell wrote:
> 
>> In article 
>> <59e870a4-a045-4a92-a641-38bea4b3acc3@pw4g2000pbc.googlegroups.com>,
>>
>> 
Mentifex <mentifex@myuw.net> wrote:
>> 
>>> "IN THE BEGINNING WAS THE COMMAND LINE"
>> 
>> In my day Sonny we entered programs through the front panel in
>> absolute octal machine code, no sissy assemblers for us and we
>> liked it.
>> 
>> See also, and a later more effete time "Mel the real
>> programmer".
>> 
>> Toggle switches and wiring boards. You haven't programmed until
>> you've entered patches at least through the front panel.
> 
> You had switches??!!!! My first programming task required a
> soldering iron to put the diodes onto the matrix boards. ;>
> 
> When I graduated to switches (my first 6800 project) my codes were
> in hand crafted hex (about 4k of the stuff). Then we got to the
> ASR33 teletype and paper tape (when we got clever and wrote the
> names of progs on the leader). Also liked the way we could
> programme the magnetic core memory and carry it across the factory
> to plug it into the system that required it.
> 

When *I* was apprenticing, I had to carry the Jaquard Loom cards
across the mill floor to the Master. I'll never forget the day I
dropped them and mistakenly thought the order of the cards didn't matter.

On the bright side, I may have inadvertently invented psychedelic
tapestries. My next job was less eventful and involved stables.


mike


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJPdR4pAAoJEDTMN7GV3zbX97kH/Ro0n23QDGoLAzJgo5WKsG2T
6/MfU3g12oeMiSe+sp1gyImml4KVIu8dMC/j1DXBuRClZA2pAwXEhXQST7Zz6fZ9
t11MXsrvt5SeFK9+bRp8LvAqCo/1MEJQolCv322Ky8daAwW2x534ggPfl2BJnv6U
LxL365apKgSrQMFZhNETkzkMTWCfxr5+JV+wiNc7/jjoM5uPPmm43mzddh8k5bjW
GQynzluovfD1v7YUP9LtzQA0HSGye8eNztCO4HLuZiAJLFhiTGOnP9AaqXZZ/H/D
oLse6uz5vCAx+wu80TVPWhDxI+auC0RV/nDtF2Dqf+Jrjy4Kdtwie6oI8Ba/TPI=
=z3Hd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Back to comp.lang.forth | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Mentifex <mentifex@myuw.net> - 2012-02-17 11:32 -0800
  Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 18:31 -0500
    Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-02-18 04:52 -0500
      Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Elizabeth D. Rather" <erather@forth.com> - 2012-02-18 08:57 -1000
    Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Krishna Myneni <krishna.myneni@ccreweb.org> - 2012-02-18 12:21 -0800
      Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 10:30 -0500
        Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology John Passaniti <john.passaniti@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 15:50 -0800
  Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Brad <hwfwguy@gmail.com> - 2012-02-17 16:30 -0800
  Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Rod Pemberton" <do_not_have@noavailemail.cmm> - 2012-02-18 05:28 -0500
    Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Mentifex <mentifex@myuw.net> - 2012-02-18 11:15 -0800
      Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2012-02-18 15:44 -0500
        Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-02-19 09:16 +0000
          Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "A. K." <minforth@arcor.de> - 2012-02-19 12:53 +0100
            Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-02-19 12:47 +0000
              Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 09:12 -0500
                Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-02-20 21:43 +0000
                Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Doug Hoffman <glidedog@gmail.com> - 2012-02-20 18:12 -0500
                Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-02-21 23:19 +0000
          Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Walter Bushell <proto@panix.com> - 2012-02-19 08:27 -0500
          Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "P.M.Lawrence" <pml540114@gmail.com> - 2012-02-19 06:15 -0800
          Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2012-02-26 05:56 +1100
            Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-02-25 23:39 +0000
              Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Jason Damisch <jasondamisch@yahoo.com> - 2012-03-08 19:03 -0800
                Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology "Paul E. Bennett" <Paul_E.Bennett@topmail.co.uk> - 2012-03-09 20:13 +0000
          Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology m II <C@in.the.hat> - 2012-03-29 20:45 -0600
        Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Don McKenzie <5V@2.5A> - 2012-02-26 09:43 +1100
  Re: Don't Fall in Love With Your Technology Hugh Aguilar <hughaguilar96@yahoo.com> - 2012-02-21 17:12 -0800

csiph-web