Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
| Newsgroups | sci.logic |
|---|---|
| Date | 2023-06-16 23:49 -0700 |
| References | <e5d33e99-c842-4bb2-90ff-724b33a97707n@googlegroups.com> <7e5442c5-7f4f-44fe-b320-fc6483ccfd88n@googlegroups.com> |
| Message-ID | <31aab6e4-2b74-4f34-8656-5e300bc93ed0n@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines |
| From | Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> |
On Friday, June 16, 2023 at 11:28:55 AM UTC-4, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: > On Monday, June 5, 2023 at 6:32:26 PM UTC-4, Daniel Pehoushek wrote: > > the other most recent thread titled > > with wisdom is both monotone and conjunctive > > discusses the 50 lines of class allqbfs > > for transforming from pspace in disjunctive normal form > > into qspace first in dnf (linear space time) then cnf (quadratic time) > > > > the code is correct for all sizes but succeeds on modest sizes > > such as c3d5n240 three coloring fifth degree 240 vertices > > > > the 1000 line program prints out > > a monotone conjunctive normal form that > > decides all 2^n possible quantifications > > one conjunction of brief monotone disjunctions describes wisdom > > > > i posit those transforms are high level mind > > the equality of np with #p and pspace and #q and qspace > > is supportive of the "mind equations" idea > > > > i have studied satisfiability for thirty years after > > in 1997 discovering #p=#q > > the number of satisfying assignments equals > > the number of valid quantifications in 1997 (knuth volume four) > > > > avoid negation and be a good leader > > daniel2380+++ > > the 2380 is out of 2400 on the 1983 gres graduate records examination > so NP=Pspace=#P=#Q=Qspace and for modest sizes formulas are solvable. > That is, #P=Exp but is P for modest size. > > The output of my program is a monotone cnf that decides every quantification. > The program is as good as it gets. > > One major discovery is that clause learning is wrong for #P and therefore also wrong for NP. > avoid negation and be well > daniel2380+++ the big equality derives from searching the whole space of possibility. for modest sizes the whole space is solvable, so that for qspace, production of a monotone form that decides all 2^n quantifications is possible. is this topic appropriate for sci.logic? the solution of the boolean hierarchy? be well and avoid negation daniel2380+++
Back to sci.logic | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-05 15:32 -0700
Re: NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-16 08:28 -0700
Re: NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-16 23:49 -0700
Re: NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-17 16:17 -0700
Re: NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-18 13:54 -0700
Re: NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-21 15:11 -0700
Re: NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines Rich D <rdelaney2001@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 14:38 -0700
Re: NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-22 15:25 -0700
Re: NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines Rich D <rdelaney2001@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 13:04 -0700
Re: NP Pspace #P #Q Qspace equality theory for modest sizes in 1000 lines Daniel Pehoushek <pehoushek1@gmail.com> - 2023-06-24 14:14 -0700
csiph-web