Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.c++ > #119183

Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?

From wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.c++
Subject Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this?
Date 2024-05-21 02:23 +0800
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <239b5d6057b5b9d7b63d62235fac97facb039718.camel@gmail.com> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <v2edbr$3pl2i$1@dont-email.me> <eaa0ef93ca03f744edc4fbcf6e79fc730805cce9.camel@gmail.com> <v2fom7$1pfh$1@dont-email.me> <32565d46f03edef2380267eeb552fcce102e6753.camel@gmail.com> <v2g0vb$3j0c$2@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

On Mon, 2024-05-20 at 12:23 -0500, olcott wrote:
> On 5/20/2024 11:21 AM, wij wrote:
> > On Mon, 2024-05-20 at 10:02 -0500, olcott wrote:
> > > On 5/20/2024 7:37 AM, wij wrote:
> > > > On Sun, 2024-05-19 at 21:43 -0500, olcott wrote:
> > > > > On 5/19/2024 8:52 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> > > > > > Am 19.05.2024 um 21:00 schrieb olcott:
> > > > > > > On 5/19/2024 1:08 PM, Bonita Montero wrote:
> > > > > > > > Am 18.05.2024 um 23:40 schrieb olcott:
> > > > > > > > > People are saying that they have no idea what this code does
> > > > > > > > > because they do not believe it conforms to c11 or c17.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function
> > > > > > > > > 00 int H(ptr x, ptr y);
> > > > > > > > > 01 int D(ptr x)
> > > > > > > > > 02 {
> > > > > > > > > 03   int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
> > > > > > > > > 04   if (Halt_Status)
> > > > > > > > > 05     HERE: goto HERE;
> > > > > > > > > 06   return Halt_Status;
> > > > > > > > > 07 }
> > > > > > > > > 08
> > > > > > > > > 09 int main()
> > > > > > > > > 10 {
> > > > > > > > > 11   H(D,D);
> > > > > > > > > 12   return 0;
> > > > > > > > > 13 }
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > In the above case a simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly
> > > > > > > > > emulates
> > > > > > > > > at least one of the x86 instructions of D in the order specified by the
> > > > > > > > > x86 instructions of D.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > This may include correctly emulating the x86 instructions of H in the
> > > > > > > > > order specified by the x86 instructions of H thus calling H(D,D) in
> > > > > > > > > recursive simulation.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > *Execution Trace*
> > > > > > > > > Line 11: main() invokes H(D,D);
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > *keeps repeating* (unless aborted)
> > > > > > > > > Line 01:
> > > > > > > > > Line 02:
> > > > > > > > > Line 03: simulated D(D) invokes simulated H(D,D) that simulates D(D)
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > *Simulation invariant*
> > > > > > > > > D correctly simulated by H cannot possibly reach past its own line 03.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > > The key thing to note is that no D correctly simulated by any H of
> > > > > > > > > every
> > > > > > > > > H/D pair specified by the above template ever reaches its own line 06
> > > > > > > > > and halts.
> > > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Other people think 30s about this, you think years about that.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > It is the basis for my two decades long primary research into
> > > > > > > termination analysis. People on another forum have written
> > > > > > > hundreds of posts claiming that D correctly simulated by H
> > > > > > > reaches its own line 06 and halts.
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > *I have only gotten truthful answers on this forum*
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > That's not research, that's nonsense.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > 
> > > > > This is not the forum to show that it is not nonsense this is
> > > > > a simple C question that I should not even have to ask except
> > > > > for a few people in another forum that consistently lie about
> > > > > the answer.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I have been a professional C++ developer since Y2K. So I already
> > > > > know the answer, I just need some competent people in this forum
> > > > > to attest to this answer. I met Bjarne Stroustrup back when he
> > > > > was going around the country promoting his new language.
> > > > > 
> > > > 
> > > > typedef int (*ptr)();  // ptr is pointer to int function
> > > > int H(ptr x, ptr y);
> > > > int D(ptr x)
> > > > {
> > > >     int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
> > > >     if (Halt_Status)
> > > >       HERE: goto HERE;
> > > >     return Halt_Status;
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > int main()
> > > > {
> > > >     H(D,D);
> > > >     return 0;
> > > > }
> > > > 
> > > > The code above does not compile:
> > > 
> > > *It does compile*
> > > *It does compile*
> > > *It does compile*
> > > *It does compile*
> > > 
> > > typedef int (*ptr)();
> > > int H(ptr P, ptr I);
> > > 
> > > int D(ptr x)
> > > {
> > >     int Halt_Status = H(x, x);
> > >     if (Halt_Status)
> > >       HERE: goto HERE;
> > >     return Halt_Status;
> > > }
> > > 
> > > int main()
> > > {
> > >     H(D,D);
> > >     return 0;
> > > }
> > > 
> > > cl  /GS- /std:c11 /c /arch:IA32 Test_Compile.c
> > > cl  /GS- /std:c17 /c /arch:IA32 Test_Compile.c
> > > if ERRORLEVEL 1 pause
> > > 
> > > 
> > > D:\__HP_Stream\__NLU_Notes\__Work_In_Progress\__Halt_Decider_X86\___x86utm_VS>echo
> > > off
> > > 
> > > D:\__HP_Stream\__NLU_Notes\__Work_In_Progress\__Halt_Decider_X86\___x86utm_VS>REM
> > > 2022
> > > 
> > > D:\__HP_Stream\__NLU_Notes\__Work_In_Progress\__Halt_Decider_X86\___x86utm_VS>call
> > > "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Visual
> > > Studio\2022\Community\Common7\Tools\VsDevCmd.BAT"
> > > **********************************************************************
> > > ** Visual Studio 2022 Developer Command Prompt v17.6.4
> > > ** Copyright (c) 2022 Microsoft Corporation
> > > **********************************************************************
> > > Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.36.32535 for x86
> > > Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.
> > > 
> > > Test_Compile.c
> > > Microsoft (R) C/C++ Optimizing Compiler Version 19.36.32535 for x86
> > > Copyright (C) Microsoft Corporation.  All rights reserved.
> > > 
> > > Test_Compile.c
> > > Press any key to continue . . .
> > 
> > OK, My fault, gcc can compile (g++ can't. No idea why D's protocol doesn't match
> > type ptr and get compiled in C).
> > 
> 
> 
> In the above case a simulator is an x86 emulator that correctly emulates
> at least one of the x86 instructions of D in the order specified by the
> x86 instructions of D.
> 
> This may include correctly emulating the x86 instructions of H in the
> order specified by the x86 instructions of H thus calling H(D,D) in
> recursive simulation.
> 
> *I just need to people that have persistently lied*
> *about this for two years to be put in their place*
> 
> *Can you see that*
> For every H/D pair of the above template D correctly simulated by pure
> function (thus computable function) H cannot possibly reach its own
> final state at line 06 and halt.

People understand "H cannot possibly reach its own final state at line 06
and halt". People should be saying that your H cannot stop 'simulation' so as
to be called a simolation of D.
Your H surely can stop and make whatever decision, but since D is defined on
the behavior of H, D knows it, D will also change its behavior. This change
of behavior of D to behave differently can never be simulated and decided by H, 
whatever H tries.

The logic is the same as the liar's paradox. H cannot return yes/no correctly.
All others are whatever you like to say, nothing to do with the HP. Godel,Sisper,Tarsky....

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 16:40 -0500
  Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-05-18 18:33 -0400
  Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of         this? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-18 21:12 -0400
    Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-18 22:16 -0500
      Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? jak <nospam@please.ty> - 2024-05-19 06:24 +0200
  Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-19 20:08 +0200
    Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-19 14:00 -0500
      Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org> - 2024-05-19 15:24 -0400
      Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 03:52 +0200
        Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-19 21:43 -0500
          Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 07:09 +0200
            Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 00:38 -0500
              Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 08:41 +0200
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 09:47 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 17:16 +0200
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 11:01 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 19:15 +0200
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:20 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2024-05-20 19:26 +0100
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:09 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 11:35 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:15 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:23 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:28 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:30 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:34 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:35 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:36 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:38 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:42 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:38 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:40 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:44 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:48 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:50 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:52 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:32 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:37 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:41 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:45 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:47 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:53 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 13:04 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 15:10 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 13:19 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 13:21 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 15:30 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 13:31 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 13:32 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 15:36 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 13:38 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 15:52 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:05 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:09 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 16:27 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 13:48 -0700
              Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-20 10:10 +0200
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 09:51 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Paavo Helde <eesnimi@osa.pri.ee> - 2024-05-20 18:05 +0300
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 10:11 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 17:17 +0200
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 11:07 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-21 00:14 +0200
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 17:23 -0500
          Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 20:37 +0800
            Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 10:02 -0500
              Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 00:21 +0800
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 12:23 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 02:23 +0800
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 14:07 -0500
            Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 19:23 -0700
              Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 19:31 -0700
              Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 22:58 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-21 09:39 +0200
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Janis Papanagnou <janis_papanagnou+ng@hotmail.com> - 2024-05-21 09:55 +0200
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 08:31 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 15:56 +0200
                Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 09:09 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 20:01 +0200
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 13:09 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 20:13 +0200
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 13:24 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 20:39 +0200
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 13:48 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 06:40 +0200
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 23:46 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 18:29 +0200
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 08:52 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 12:01 +0200
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 23:37 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 06:29 +0200
                D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 10:44 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation "Fred. Zwarts" <F.Zwarts@HetNet.nl> - 2024-05-22 18:27 +0200
                Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 00:11 +0800
                Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt] olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 15:04 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt] olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 16:26 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation [good attempt] wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> - 2024-05-23 05:35 +0800
                Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 16:56 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 15:36 -0700
                Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 17:52 -0500
                Re: D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 18:33 -0700
          Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of         this? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-20 18:59 -0400
            Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 18:07 -0500
              Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of         this? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-20 19:21 -0400
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 18:27 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of         this? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-21 07:48 -0400
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 08:37 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 12:03 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 14:21 -0500
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 14:39 -0700
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of         this? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-21 17:55 -0400
                Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 17:09 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 15:18 -0700
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 15:20 -0700
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 17:29 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 15:34 -0700
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 18:07 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 16:54 -0700
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 19:05 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and         halt? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-21 21:31 -0400
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 20:43 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and         halt? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-21 22:10 -0400
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 21:17 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and         halt? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-21 22:20 -0400
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 21:22 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-21 23:03 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 08:53 -0500
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and         halt? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-22 13:10 -0400
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 13:50 -0700
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and         halt? Sam <sam@email-scan.com> - 2024-05-22 07:01 -0400
                Re: Can D correctly simulated by H reach its own line 06 and halt? Bonita Montero <Bonita.Montero@gmail.com> - 2024-05-22 13:50 +0200
                Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 21:00 -0700
                Can D simulated by any H possibly reach its own line 06 and halt? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 23:22 -0500
  Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? Marcel Mueller <news.5.maazl@spamgourmet.org> - 2024-05-20 15:14 +0200
    Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 10:10 -0500
    Re: Can someone please verify the execution trace of this? olcott <polcott333@gmail.com> - 2024-05-20 10:13 -0500

csiph-web