Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #702220
| From | John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy, comp.os.linux.misc |
| Subject | Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? |
| Date | 2025-12-03 08:39 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20251203083900.00002c04@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | (14 earlier) <XnsB39DB0F74638CHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> <20251120145948.00000987@gmail.com> <XnsB39FE31DCFC2FHT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> <20251124092600.00001815@gmail.com> <XnsB3A99AD60239HT1@cF04o3ON7k2lx05.lLC.9r5> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
On Tue, 2 Dec 2025 20:13:15 -0000 (UTC) Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> wrote: > > Interesting - I'm curious how common that actually was back in the > > day, though? I don't recall a lot of DOS applications that I used > > chaining from one EXE to another, unless you were really into > > launcher-menu type utilities; most of what I remember was single > > EXEs for the main program plus accessory EXEs for configuration > > (i.e. the inevitable SOUNDSET.EXE and its ilk,) and transfer of > > control was usually mediated by a *.BAT launcher script. > > It was common enough to be known amongst every coder I knew. Some > programmers too. Take some of the multi floppy install packages for > example. Some decrypted the necessary materials as they built the > primary file on your computer. The primary file wouldn't always have > a proper executable extension, but, it was still actually an .EXE > most of the time. Huh, I'm trying to model what an exploit would look like here - who & what would be vulnerable to this? Obviously you *can* create a disk file with a non-EXE extension & whatever contents you want, but under what circumstances is another program gonna call the load-and-execute routine on any arbitrary filename (other than, as mentioned, app-menu utilities or command-shell alternatives?) Or if the game is to replace one of an application suite's own I-can't-believe-it's-not-EXEs with a Trojan, which developers bothered to mask their secondary EXEs under a different extension, and why...? (I mean, yes, installers might well build a final EXE from smaller and/or compressed/encrypted chunks, but the *resulting* file would normally still have an EXE extension, and be invoked the usual way.) Not saying that it doesn't make sense to check files on a better-safe- than-sorry heuristic, just trying to figure out how you'd get to the point of pulling that kind of trick in the first place...
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-02 20:13 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 08:39 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-03 19:42 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-03 22:03 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 22:36 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 03:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 14:24 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 14:35 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 08:21 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 18:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 10:09 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 19:09 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-04 11:11 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-04 19:55 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 22:47 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 00:15 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 22:48 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 00:14 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 22:47 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-05 00:16 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? John Ames <commodorejohn@gmail.com> - 2025-12-03 14:41 -0800
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-04 03:05 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-07 04:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-08 02:32 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-08 04:36 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? vallor <vallor@vallor.earth> - 2025-12-08 14:30 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-12-08 23:21 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-09 10:01 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-10 01:37 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? pothead <pothead@snakebite.com> - 2025-12-10 18:13 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Brock McNuggets <brock.mcnuggets@gmail.com> - 2025-12-10 20:06 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-12 07:44 +0000
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Daniel70 <daniel47@nomail.afraid.org> - 2025-12-12 22:39 +1100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2025-12-12 12:18 +0000
SYSCALL "Carlos E.R." <robin_listas@es.invalid> - 2025-12-10 14:01 +0100
Re: What Thinkest Thou Of LO Donate Banner? Gremlin <nobody@haph.org> - 2025-12-10 01:37 +0000
csiph-web