Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.c > #391160
| From | Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.c |
| Subject | Re: Python recompile |
| Date | 2025-03-14 11:32 +0200 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20250314113217.0000634b@yahoo.com> (permalink) |
| References | (11 earlier) <vqmgjv$3a2il$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vqn4dn$1eb9s$1@dont-email.me> <vqo3ss$3hkas$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vqph2e$203bs$2@dont-email.me> <vqvtop$cpvn$1@paganini.bofh.team> |
On Fri, 14 Mar 2025 00:37:48 -0000 (UTC) antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) wrote: > bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote: > > On 11/03/2025 01:33, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > >> bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote: > >>> On 10/03/2025 10:58, Waldek Hebisch wrote: > >>>> bart <bc@freeuk.com> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> I think nobody does. There's always been some sort of mystique > >>>>> surrounding 'gcc' on Windows. > >>>>> > >>>>> 'MinGW' supposedly 'Minimalist Gnu on Windows'. In that case I > >>>>> wouldn't like to see the full-scale one.. > >>>> > >>>> "Minimalist" is not about size of the compiler. Rather, it is > >>>> about possible support routines. For "hosted implementation" C > >>>> mandates presence of C library and there is a lot of functions > >>>> not in C standard, but included in libraries of C compilers. > >>>> There is also question of operating system support, complicated > >>>> by fact that Windows is different than other systems. Cygwin > >>>> solved those issues by offering Posix emulation and a sizable > >>>> collection os libraries. MinGW is minimalist in the sense > >>>> that it provides very little own libraries and mainly uses > >>>> what is provide by Windows. > >>> > >>> I still don't get this stuff. > >>> > >>> I get the impression that a port of gcc to Windows is not simply > >>> about building C programs, but building C programs that use a lot > >>> of features from Linux. > >> > >> You apparently do not get fact that people want tools to > >> automate various routine tasks. > > > > What routine task is this? I'm talking exclusively about turning a > > bunch of source files in some language (here it is C) into an > > executable binary. > > > > This task can be done with a program called a 'compiler'. > > You ignore fact that people are developing programs. And developement > is much more than "turning a bunch of source files into an > executable". GPL says "The source code for a work means the preferred > form of the work for making modifications to it". And that nicely > captures the idea: sources are in form that is convenient for > developer and may require several steps before one gets the > executable. > > > However, what I'm arguing about is that this simple task has become > > unnecessarily elaborate on OSes like Linux, by introducing > > makefiles, OS-specific scripts, and OS-specific utilities. > > There is not much OS-specific in "Linux tools". 'make' is > problematic on zOS, because files have no timestamps there, > but most normal OS-es have timestamps (and IIUC even zOS > has USS where timestamps are available). You need ability > to invoke a program from a different program, exact form > of this is OS-dependent, but ability is there in any > semi-reasonable general purpose OS. You need ability > to get exit status of a program, again exact form is > OS-dependent but ability is there. > > FYI, is started using "Linux tools" on MS-DOS, before I > heard about Linux. And tools are widely available, > IIUC classic zOS is problematic, but I think that USS > is OK. Some systems may be prone to breakage, when > there is small number of _active_ users and nobody bothers > to timely report real problems. > > Coming back to developement, in many cases it is desirable > to generate some C files. C preprocessor can do some > transformations, but is may be convenient to transform > source in a way hard to do via proprocessor. Also, > this is C group, but big programs frequently have parts > in different languages, an then it is good to have > language-neutral tools. Simple tools to transform > or generate files are 'sed' and 'awk'. Some people > use 'perl' or 'python' for such purpose and in principle > there is much more possiblities. > > More specialised are compiler-writing tools like 'bison' > and 'flex'. You can write a parser by hand, but using > 'bison' one does not need to know much to write working > parser. 'flex' helps in writing scanners, but IMO > is quite useful for text processing task (its support > for regular expressions is nicer than Perl or Python > offer, and speed frequently is much better too). > > Users beside binary need also documentation. In principle > documentation could be provided as plain text, but there > is now tendency to offer nicely formatted documentation > and to offer multiple formats. Which means that there is > need for formatting tools. Old ones are Texinfo and TeX. > And some moment there was push towards SGML and formats > like DocBook. This needs appropriate tools. Some people > now prefer tools like 'sphinx' (which needs Python with > several extention packages). There is 'doxygen' which > extract information from source files and presents nicely > formated info about API (I am not a fan of 'doxygen' but > is seems to be widely used). > > Beside building program and documentation one wants some > automatic way of running tests. And people want to > automate more tasks, for example removal of generated > files or installation. > > Automation requires some scripting language. For authors > of free programs important point is free availability > (preferably with sources) of choosen language. That > ruled out things like MS Basic or 'command.com' (and > 'command.com' is quite limited). Unix shell was > available as port of OS on Unix systems and quite early > there were free ports of Unix shell to other systems. > So there were natural preference to Unix shell, simply > because of wide availability. Similarly with other > classic Unix tools. One can argue that those classic > tools are now dated, but there is stong inertia in > action: tools are widely used, widely availeble, there > is knowldege how to use them so people keep using them. > > When one thinks about possible replacements, it is not an > easy job. Namely, Unix tools evolved and are designed > to work together. Different tool either must cooperate > nicely with existing tools, which forces similar > behaviour to current tools, or must provide replacement > for the whole toolkit which is much more complicated > than replacing a single tool. > > When you look at bloat, I expect competing tools to be > much more bloated than classic Unix tools. Namely, > Unix tools were designed to be simple and power comes > from possibility to compose them. It is hard to > imagine way of composing tools that is both simple > and offers more possibilities than Unix way. So > one can have simpler/smaller tools but less powerful. > Or one can increase fuctionality of each tools separately > (to some degree this is happening with Unix tools), but > this increases complexity of each tool. One can try > to make one tool that replaces the whole toolkit, but > experiance suggest that such a single tool would be > much more complicated. To summarize, more powerful > tools are likely to be more complicated, hence more > bloated than classic Unix tools. Given that classic > Unix tools are quite small compared to modern systems > (they can be implemented in few megabytes of code) > incentive to make smaller tools is rather low. > > > This is done even on smaller, simple applications, and also on > > those that are supposedly cross-platform that are to be built on > > the target. > > You can have basic toolkit running on rather wide set of systems. > So this is not a big burden for recipients, in particuar since > the same toolkit may be used to build many programs. > > > If scripts are going to be used, then use them at the developer > > site only, and make the script generate the streamlined set of > > files for the particular platform of interest. > > Current free software ecosystem is colaborative work of many people. > In particular, there are people creating binary packages and if > all you want is running binary you may be better off getting a > package from them. Now, people creating binaries want to do > this in an automated way. For them having to give a list of files > to compiler each time when they build a package is too mach work. > They have scripts that fetch sources from the net, check checksums > (to verify authenticity), run 'configure' and 'make'. They are > willing to install tools which are needed for this work. > > > It should not rely on anything that is not native to the target > > platform. > > Why not? You already admited that one need a compiler. While > a bunch of tiny tools should be a blocker? > > >> And people do not want > >> to reinvent the wheel, they prefer to use code written > >> by others. > > > > What wheels are these that are being reinvented? I'm simply arguing > > for using either 2 or 4 wheels, not 18! > > > > And I'm not suggesting reinventing those 2/4 either, just using the > > ones I have on my OS. > > Well, one trouble is that things you have on your preferred OS are > not free, one can not use them legally on a different OS. And when > it comes to developement tools what cames with basic install of > your OS seem to be quite limited. No law prevents you from installing > free tools and that is simplest solution. > > Alternative is extra work for developers to reproduce what tool do > within program, that would be reinventing the wheel. Or some > intermedate stages between binary and source, which require extra > work and there seem to be small interest in such things (say > hundreds of people among milions using free software). > > > >> Folks at Bell Labs had several good ideas > >> and shared them with others. Those ideas are not limited > >> to Linux or Unix, you can look at old "Software tools in ..." > >> books to understand what I am talking about. MinGW > >> _distribution_ bundles several tools. This allows you > >> to compile programs when build process uses those tools. > >> You can also use the tools for your purpose. Aparently > >> you have very strong "not invented here" syndrom and > >> insist on usig your own tools. > > > > That's another aspect of it which is not that relevant, other than > > it shows just how simple things could be. > > > > To build open source projects, I'm happy to use an existing C > > compiler. I'm NOT happy about bending over backwards to use CYGWIN, > > MSYS2 or WSL because the developers insist on forcing their Linux > > dependencies down my throat. > > As I explained they want to use tools. Some tools may be problematic, > but I see no reason to reject base tools. For most programs you do > not need to CYGWIN or WSL. Concerning MSYS2, IIUC they reuse small > part of Cygwin to support developement tools. If for some reason > you find this problematic, you may invest some time in making > the tools more pure, that is using native Windows calls instead > of Posix emulation provided by Cygwin. Some of this was done > to improve performance, but for people using MSYS2 performance > seem to be OK and clearly using native calls Windows calls on > Windows means that there need to be special variant for Windows > which adds extra work, so they have little motivation to remove > all traces of Cygwin. If you are concerned about bloat, then > you should take into account that base tools can be quite > small (of order of few megabytes for whole toolkit). > > If you object using tools that behave the same on Linux and > Windows, then really developers insist on this. Simply, > using common tools is basic survival strategy. Otherwise > they would have to spend effort on incompatible "Windows > native toolkit" which would fragment developement effort. > > Using no tools may work for very simple projects, but > means too much extra work in other cases. > > Extra remark: in one case I asked people using a program > on Windows which way is most convenient for them. Rather > old answer was "And Linux" (which was a package allowing > to run Linux binaries on Windows), modern answer was WSL. > You see, people were interested in shortest way to get > running program, not about purity of approach. > > > (Those developers also seem to think that the only alternative to > > MSYS2, configure scripts etc is to use the monstrosity that is MS > > Visual Studio and all it comprises.) > > You see, people that use Windows also want to use tools. And > when they do not like or can not use simpler tools they go to > Visual Studio. > > > If an application is written in C, then a C compiler should suffice. > > > >> That is fine, as long > >> as you keep this to yourselfs. But refusing other > >> folks right to use tools they want to use is not > >> fair. > > > > Developers can do what they like. But they shouldn't inflict their > > choices on other people, especially those using other OSes. > > Well, I use Linux and can maintain X based GUI. Since I do > not have Windows I can not create native Windows GUI. And > while there were several significant contributors to the > program (some working on Windows), nobody volunteered to > create Windows GUI. So ATM for this program the only way > to get GUI on Windows is to use Cygwin and X library provided > by Cygwin or run Linux version under WSL. AFAIK related > approach was used by several commercial vendors providing > both Unix and Windows versions of their programs: they used > X based GUI, on Windows linked with commercial X library and > connected to available X server. So, simply since "cost" of > providing native GUI is too high, programs used X based GUI. > > I do not know why you develop software. For me significant > part is fun, in particular that I can do "interesting" > things with moderate effort. But all that fun disappears > if somebody want we to do a lot of work for no good > reason (beyond "I want it that way"). There were cases > when I wanted things some way and spent effort to make > them work that way. I do not complain that other > developers did not want to do work for me. > > >> Or, to put it differently, when you refuse > >> the tools _you_ need to do by hand needed work. > >> You may be able to extract from work of others > >> something that fits your taste (like list of files > >> to compile), but that is your business. > > > > Fine. In that case tell me what the files are! Lua actually does > > this (but it's not obvious, it's also unexpected since the majority > > of apps are unhelpful in such matters). > > > > When I tried to build A68G, the whole build process, under > > VirtualBox Linux, took 5 minutes. I couldn't build under Windows > > because of a 30,000-line bash script. > > IME shell scripts usually were no problem, except for possibly > requiring some patience (they run significantly slower than on > Linux). In one case 'configure' script was really problematic, > that is for about 2 weeks Windows NT 4.0 kept crashing, guy > wanting to compile program restarted Windows, 'configure' made > some progress and then Windows crashed again. After 2 weeks > the guy gave up, run configure on Linux (I think it was the > same hardware), 'configure' needed 2 hours on Linux, but > went fine. Then some extra hours to compile the program. > Note that there were _system_ crashes running otherwise ordinary > program. However, Windows now seem to be much more reliable, > so I do not expect trouble like this. And the mentioned 'configure' > script on Linux run exceptionally long. > > > However, with some effort, I was able to isolate the C files > > needed, and fortunately there was no synthesised code. Given that > > list of 12 files (!) building the app on Windows took my compiler > > one second. > >>> If so, then that's the wrong approach. There are various lesser > >>> compilers which know nothing about mingw or posix of anything of > >>> the sort. (For example, lccwin32, DMC, PellesC, I think Tiny C; I > >>> can't speak for MSVC.) > >> > >> You may be able to do some things using just a C compiler. > >> But requesting people to do other things by hand is as > >> wise as requesting them to code in assembler > > > > What things, what assembly? I'm talking about building a program > > written in a HLL using an existing compiler. > > > > That seems reasonable enough, yes? > > > > The only info needed is the list of files to submit to said > > compiler. > > If thats to the only needed info than Makefile.in (thing used as > a template for Makefile) should contain something like: > > SRCS = file1.c file2.c fileN.c > > and list of files would be easy to extract from Makefile.in > (just look for list of files). But usually there is more to > this, like compiler flags, generated headers, etc. And the > list of files usually depends on OS and possibly other > factors. > > > (assembler > >> may be converted to binary faster than C, and with enough > >> effort resulting binary will run faster than result of > >> C compilation :). Another thing are libraries and > >> bigger applications. Some folks want "true Windows look > >> and feel", some say that proper Windows DLL must be > >> compiled by MSVC > > > > Any C compiler for Windows can generate DLL files. > > I am not an expert on Windows features. But one things was > that they wanted "components". Another was exception handling. > So "just a DLL" was too little for them. > > >> (otherwise is lack some features that > >> they consider essential). But there are people who > >> had to or wanted to use Windows, but also wanted to > >> use Unix applications. Cygwin was addressed to such > >> folks: it allows you to compile substantial Unix > >> application so that it runs on Windows. If you have > >> no interest in such applications, than fine, Cygwin > >> is probably not for you. Today WSL may be better > >> for such a goal, but in the past Cygwin provided > >> easiest way to port Unix application to Windows. > >> If easy port was the goal and application was > >> substantial, then Cygwin usually was right choice. > > > > As I understand it, POSIX is about 80 header files, of which ~30 > > are the standard C headers, leaving 50 POSIX headers that do not > > exist on Windows. > > > > If your Linux app uses those headers, and you want to port it to > > Windows, then you have problems to solve. > > > > But I would question whether the apps I want to build need all > > that. How does POSIX figure in the GMP library for example? > > Well, GMP needs some way to signal division by 0. Which in principle > do not require system stuff, but maybe they use something to > do it nicer. From GMP manual: "Division is undefined if the divisor is zero. Passing a zero divisor to the division or modulo functions (including the modular powering functions mpz_powm and mpz_powm_ui) will cause an intentional division by zero. This lets a program handle arithmetic exceptions in these functions the same way as for normal C int arithmetic." So, they didn't find reason to complicate it with unnecessary dependencies. > GMP need memory allocation, which can be done via > 'malloc' but also my be dan via system calls. > I am pretty sure that they don't use system calls.
Back to comp.lang.c | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Python recompile doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-03-02 14:35 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-03-02 15:54 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-03-02 16:58 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lew Pitcher <lew.pitcher@digitalfreehold.ca> - 2025-03-02 17:08 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 08:14 +0000
Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-02 12:30 -0500
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-02 18:35 +0000
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-03 10:29 -0800
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 08:13 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 08:31 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 10:44 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-03 12:20 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 15:03 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-03 16:39 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 12:47 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 15:06 +0000
Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-03 10:22 -0500
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 16:19 +0000
Re: Python recompile geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 11:24 -0500
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 16:26 +0000
Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-03 11:39 -0500
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-03 16:56 +0000
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-03 18:22 +0100
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 08:31 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-04 17:28 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 17:25 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 08:32 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 08:56 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 09:23 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 09:57 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 10:03 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 10:25 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 11:19 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-04 12:27 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 13:15 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-04 17:56 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-04 17:42 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-04 18:16 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-05 00:16 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-05 01:20 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-05 02:20 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-05 11:46 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-05 14:12 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 00:37 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-06 08:42 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-06 20:28 +0000
Re: Python recompile Mark Bourne <nntp.mbourne@spamgourmet.com> - 2025-03-07 20:34 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 21:22 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-07 09:56 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-07 21:17 +0000
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-05 15:36 -0800
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-06 00:37 +0000
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-06 13:45 -0800
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-06 23:55 +0000
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-13 14:52 -0700
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-15 11:30 +0000
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-19 00:14 -0700
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-19 16:21 +0000
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-21 00:20 -0700
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-07 01:51 +0000
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-13 14:49 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 02:28 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-06 11:15 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 22:17 +0000
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-07 15:48 +0100
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-05 09:10 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-05 22:08 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-06 00:01 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 00:45 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-06 19:21 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-06 20:16 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 21:30 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-07 01:07 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-08 02:26 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-11 00:06 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 21:27 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-07 09:53 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-07 14:00 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-07 14:09 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-07 18:02 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-07 12:15 -0800
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-07 21:30 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-07 22:47 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-07 15:21 -0800
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-08 05:07 +0000
Re: Python recompile flexibeast@gmail.com - 2025-03-08 09:55 +1100
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-07 15:46 -0800
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-08 02:05 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-07 23:19 -0800
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-08 10:12 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-08 14:48 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-08 06:17 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-08 19:29 +0200
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-08 18:15 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-08 13:13 -0800
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-08 23:03 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 01:26 +0200
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-09 02:30 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 11:28 +0200
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 14:26 +0200
What is the source language? (Was: Python recompile) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-03-09 13:41 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-09 17:24 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-09 18:06 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-09 21:48 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-10 15:20 +0200
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-10 15:11 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-10 17:12 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-10 18:05 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-10 19:26 +0000
History of poll() API (was: Python recompile) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 11:12 +0200
Re: History of poll() API (was: Python recompile) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-11 15:07 +0000
Re: History of poll() API (was: Python recompile) cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) - 2025-03-11 19:10 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-11 08:31 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-11 14:12 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-11 14:24 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-10 21:38 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-11 08:34 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-11 20:52 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-12 08:11 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-14 01:47 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-14 10:37 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-14 15:10 +0000
Something other than... (Was: Python recompile) gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-03-12 12:22 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-10 21:36 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 14:40 -0700
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-10 21:55 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 00:24 +0200
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 17:56 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 22:50 -0700
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-13 16:36 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-10 23:19 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 17:56 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-11 03:07 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 21:25 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 21:27 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 14:22 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-11 06:38 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 16:50 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-10 01:39 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 19:18 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-10 06:20 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 12:53 -0700
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-10 20:59 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 14:09 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-10 21:42 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 14:44 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 14:45 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 14:48 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-10 23:21 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 19:01 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-11 03:07 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 21:30 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-11 06:39 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 14:12 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-11 22:56 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 17:17 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-12 00:45 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 20:04 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-12 03:12 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 21:22 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-12 06:50 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 13:09 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 22:25 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-13 20:36 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 15:07 -0700
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-13 23:17 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 16:45 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 16:49 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 16:58 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-13 17:01 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-14 01:48 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 12:46 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 12:48 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 15:13 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 15:14 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-14 21:20 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 15:06 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-14 23:03 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 16:25 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 16:29 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-15 02:31 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 19:35 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-15 01:16 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 19:30 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 19:33 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 19:38 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-15 05:56 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-15 13:49 -0700
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-16 06:41 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-16 16:20 -0700
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-09 18:00 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 22:55 -0700
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-10 10:58 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-10 16:36 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-10 17:25 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-10 17:46 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-10 18:12 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-10 18:00 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-10 18:00 -0700
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-11 01:33 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-11 14:24 +0000
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-11 16:06 +0100
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-11 16:23 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-11 16:49 +0000
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-11 18:09 +0100
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-11 17:47 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 20:09 +0200
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 20:17 +0200
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-11 21:37 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-12 00:58 +0200
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-12 00:43 +0000
Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-12 10:53 +0200
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-12 14:04 +0000
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-12 16:32 +0200
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-12 16:52 +0000
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-12 20:14 +0200
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-12 21:19 +0000
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-13 00:04 +0000
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-12 20:25 +0200
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-12 18:29 +0000
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 13:22 -0700
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-13 02:36 +0000
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-13 12:08 +0000
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-13 22:02 +0000
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers (Was: Python recompile) bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-13 23:32 +0000
Re: Motivation of tccc mainatainers yeti <yeti@tilde.institute> - 2025-03-14 00:47 +0042
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-11 21:20 +0100
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-11 21:18 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-03-11 21:26 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 15:56 -0700
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-12 11:37 +0100
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-12 11:14 +0000
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-12 15:58 +0100
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-12 17:32 +0200
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-12 17:48 +0100
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-12 17:12 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-13 00:08 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-13 00:33 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-13 02:35 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-13 11:16 +0000
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-13 14:40 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-13 23:34 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-12 15:32 +0000
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-12 17:55 +0100
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 12:59 -0700
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-11 21:51 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 19:34 +0200
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 14:18 -0700
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-12 11:08 +0200
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-12 12:58 -0700
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-11 21:43 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-11 22:24 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-12 01:15 +0200
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 16:02 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 17:10 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-11 17:29 -0700
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-11 21:18 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-11 20:37 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-11 22:02 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-11 23:46 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-04-10 06:54 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-14 00:37 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-14 02:21 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-14 11:32 +0200
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-14 09:54 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-14 12:32 +0200
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-14 14:33 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-14 19:28 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-14 23:01 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 16:30 -0700
Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-14 23:26 -0400
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-14 15:07 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-14 17:05 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-14 18:00 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-14 19:04 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-03-14 19:37 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-14 20:26 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-14 21:15 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-03-14 21:35 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-14 21:47 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-15 01:14 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-16 10:06 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-16 12:15 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-16 14:21 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-16 15:30 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-15 01:13 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 13:04 -0700
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-14 21:43 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 15:15 -0700
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-14 23:16 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-14 17:26 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-15 02:30 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-15 10:18 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-03-15 10:42 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-15 11:50 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-03-15 12:03 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-15 13:39 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-03-15 16:53 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-15 17:51 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-16 10:06 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-16 12:06 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-17 12:07 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-17 14:25 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-17 16:32 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-17 17:10 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-18 09:53 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-18 10:59 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-03-18 11:48 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-18 16:15 +0200
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-25 06:11 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-18 14:22 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-18 16:27 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-18 20:16 +0200
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-19 13:59 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-18 20:36 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-18 16:36 +0000
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-17 17:29 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-18 09:56 +0000
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-17 13:14 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-15 21:47 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-15 21:59 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-15 22:22 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-15 23:08 +0000
Re: Python recompile tTh <tth@none.invalid> - 2025-03-16 08:42 +0100
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-16 08:02 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-16 11:04 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-16 23:13 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-15 02:28 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-15 01:11 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-14 19:18 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-16 01:58 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-03-08 10:12 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-08 14:09 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@dastardlyhq.com - 2025-03-08 15:51 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-08 16:46 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-08 23:02 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-09 15:37 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-11 00:55 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-11 11:21 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-12 07:00 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 13:49 +0200
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-12 06:56 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-09 08:47 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-09 11:43 +0200
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-09 12:16 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-09 21:54 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-09 22:59 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-11 00:57 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-11 11:43 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-11 13:59 +0200
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-11 13:47 +0000
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-13 14:41 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-09 21:52 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-10 08:12 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-10 13:00 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-10 11:45 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-10 17:33 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-10 18:15 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-11 03:38 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-08 13:14 -0800
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-08 22:59 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 16:55 -0700
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-10 01:40 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 19:09 -0700
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-09 19:17 -0700
Re: Python recompile Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> - 2025-03-07 11:52 -0800
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-07 21:35 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-09 16:14 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-10 23:26 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-07 21:26 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-07 21:33 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-07 22:17 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-10 14:39 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-06 03:16 +0000
Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-04 19:12 -0500
Re: Python recompile gazelle@shell.xmission.com (Kenny McCormack) - 2025-03-03 23:42 +0000
Re: Python recompile geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 13:29 -0500
Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-03 16:52 -0500
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 17:19 +0000
Re: Python recompile geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 13:33 -0500
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 19:15 +0000
Re: Python recompile geodandw <geodandw@gmail.com> - 2025-03-03 18:51 -0500
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-04 00:49 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 02:29 +0000
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-04 09:12 +0100
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-04 11:33 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muffley@DinkyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 12:00 +0000
Re: Python recompile Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> - 2025-03-04 15:31 +0200
Re: Python recompile David Brown <david.brown@hesbynett.no> - 2025-03-03 18:28 +0100
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-04 08:33 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Loris Bennett" <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de> - 2025-03-04 10:19 +0100
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-04 18:06 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Loris Bennett" <loris.bennett@fu-berlin.de> - 2025-03-05 07:58 +0100
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-05 07:09 +0000
Re: Python recompile Kaz Kylheku <643-408-1753@kylheku.com> - 2025-03-05 18:54 +0000
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-05 02:22 +0000
Re: Python recompile Stuart Redmann <DerTopper@web.de> - 2025-03-06 07:35 +0100
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-06 07:32 +0000
Re: Python recompile Muttley@DastardlyHQ.org - 2025-03-06 08:39 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-06 12:40 -0800
Re: Python recompile Richard Harnden <richard.nospam@gmail.invalid> - 2025-03-06 21:39 +0000
Re: Python recompile "Chris M. Thomasson" <chris.m.thomasson.1@gmail.com> - 2025-03-07 12:36 -0800
Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-07 13:17 -0500
Re: Python recompile doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-03-03 16:12 +0000
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-02 17:54 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-02 19:15 +0000
Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-02 13:38 -0500
Re: Python recompile doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-03-03 00:42 +0000
Re: Python recompile doctor@doctor.nl2k.ab.ca (The Doctor) - 2025-03-03 00:46 +0000
Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-02 22:24 -0500
Re: Python recompile antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) - 2025-03-03 17:20 +0000
Re: Python recompile Richard Heathfield <rjh@cpax.org.uk> - 2025-03-03 17:28 +0000
Re: Python recompile James Kuyper <jameskuyper@alumni.caltech.edu> - 2025-03-03 12:57 -0500
Re: Python recompile scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) - 2025-03-03 18:02 +0000
Re: Python recompile bart <bc@freeuk.com> - 2025-03-03 19:37 +0000
Re: Python recompile Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> - 2025-03-03 17:59 -0800
Re: Python recompile Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2025-03-04 05:46 +0000
csiph-web