Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.sys.laptops.thinkpad > #577
| From | Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.sys.laptops.thinkpad |
| Subject | Re: Camera on t400s in Win10 32bit |
| Date | 2025-01-19 20:04 +0100 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <20250119200428.568e1386@ryz.dorfdsl.de> (permalink) |
| References | <vmja6t$2bo88$1@dont-email.me> |
On 19.01.2025 16:45 Uhr bp@www.zefox.net wrote: > Having shaken down the elderly t400s in both 32-bit Win10 > and 64-bit FreeBSD it turns out FreeBSD seems to think there's > a camera in the machine. It reports a Chicony webcam attached > to the USB subsystem. Windows 10 denies this, saying no camera > can be found via the Camera App. This is normal behavior if no driver is installed and the device is not being detected as camera. > Looking at the Lenovo website, there seems to be a camera driver > for 64-bit Win10 but not 32-bit. There are, however, drivers for > older Windows versions in 32-bit. Is there any point, or harm, in > trying the WinXP 32-bit camera driver? I would try Vista/7/8 first, with Vista the driver model was changed. XP might work, if not install will fail. > Might there be a better > choice altogether? A camera isn't necessary for my purposes, but > it would be nice to know if it works. At the same time, I'd rather > not mess up a working installation. Then try it in FreeBSD or Live-Linux. -- kind regards Marco Send spam to 1737301517muell@stinkedores.dorfdsl.de
Back to comp.sys.laptops.thinkpad | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Camera on t400s in Win10 32bit bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-01-19 16:45 +0000
Re: Camera on t400s in Win10 32bit Marco Moock <mm+usenet-es@dorfdsl.de> - 2025-01-19 20:04 +0100
Re: Camera on t400s in Win10 32bit bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-01-19 20:21 +0000
Re: Camera on t400s in Win10 32bit bp@www.zefox.net - 2025-01-22 00:21 +0000
csiph-web