Re: RAW vs. raw image format

From	Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc>
Newsgroups	alt.usage.english
Subject	Re: RAW vs. raw image format
Date	2023-02-23 19:31 +0300
Organization	A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID	<20230223193132.41882edd1d9110b60e745dac@gmail.moc> (permalink)
References	(14 earlier) <51151e80-a719-46ef-8095-6535309e7d02n@googlegroups.com> <20230220003936.ca90df6f8848a095271a0cbe@gmail.com> <m35ybw2609.fsf@leonis4.robolove.meer.net> <tt3eil$183th$2@dont-email.me> <tt5fue$1iapr$1@dont-email.me>

Show all headers | View raw

Tak To:

> The dot is separator.  It is part of the file's full name,
> but not of its extension.

The Wikipedia page on FAT-16 disagrees:

   8.3 filenames are limited to at most eight characters
   (after any directory specifier), followed optionally by a
   filename extension consisting of a period . and at most
   three further characters.

as does the one on /filename extension/:

   https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Filename_extension

which specifies all extensions with the leading dot.

This is redundant in the sense of informaton density, but
very practical.

-- 
()  ascii ribbon campaign -- against html e-mail
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   -- against proprietary attachments

Back to alt.usage.english | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 16:34 +0300
  Re: RAW vs. raw image format "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2023-02-19 07:19 -0800
    Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 22:00 +0300
      Re: RAW vs. raw image format "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2023-02-19 13:21 -0800
        Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.com> - 2023-02-20 00:39 +0300
          Re: RAW vs. raw image format Madhu <enometh@meer.net> - 2023-02-20 12:11 +0530
            Re: RAW vs. raw image format lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca> - 2023-02-21 15:54 -0600
              Re: RAW vs. raw image format Madhu <enometh@meer.net> - 2023-02-22 06:48 +0530
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2023-02-21 18:35 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-23 19:34 +0300
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2023-02-23 08:39 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-24 00:18 +0300
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2023-02-23 14:41 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 15:25 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Jerry Friedman <jerry.friedman99@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 15:48 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2023-02-24 07:11 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 14:38 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2023-02-23 14:46 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Tak To <takto@alum.mit.eduxx> - 2023-02-24 13:12 -0500
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 14:16 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-26 01:24 +0300
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2023-02-25 14:43 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-26 02:04 +0300
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2023-02-26 09:17 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Ruud Harmsen <rh@rudhar.com> - 2023-02-24 09:07 +0100
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format "Peter T. Daniels" <grammatim@verizon.net> - 2023-02-24 07:17 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Tak To <takto@alum.mit.eduxx> - 2023-02-24 13:07 -0500
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 14:45 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca> - 2023-02-21 22:12 -0600
              Re: RAW vs. raw image format Tak To <takto@alum.mit.eduxx> - 2023-02-22 11:30 -0500
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca> - 2023-02-22 11:15 -0600
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2023-02-22 09:36 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-23 19:21 +0300
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Ruud Harmsen <rh@rudhar.com> - 2023-02-24 07:43 +0100
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Ruud Harmsen <rh@rudhar.com> - 2023-02-24 09:03 +0100
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-25 00:50 +0300
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Ruud Harmsen <rh@rudhar.com> - 2023-02-25 08:15 +0100
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-25 12:25 +0300
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 14:22 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Athel Cornish-Bowden <athel.cb@gmail.com> - 2023-02-26 09:37 +0100
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-23 00:31 +0300
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2023-02-24 18:49 +1100
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-25 00:24 +0300
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Ruud Harmsen <rh@rudhar.com> - 2023-02-25 08:18 +0100
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Tak To <takto@alum.mit.eduxx> - 2023-02-23 15:40 -0500
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca> - 2023-02-23 15:03 -0600
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2023-02-23 14:50 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format lar3ryca <larry@invalid.ca> - 2023-02-23 22:42 -0600
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 14:32 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Tak To <takto@alum.mit.eduxx> - 2023-02-24 11:50 -0500
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Ruud Harmsen <rh@rudhar.com> - 2023-02-24 20:15 +0100
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Tak To <takto@alum.mit.eduxx> - 2023-02-25 13:06 -0500
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Snidely <snidely.too@gmail.com> - 2023-02-25 14:35 -0800
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Tak To <takto@alum.mit.eduxx> - 2023-02-25 12:27 -0500
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-23 19:31 +0300
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Rich Ulrich <rich.ulrich@comcast.net> - 2023-02-23 18:53 -0500
                Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-25 00:13 +0300
              Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-23 00:23 +0300
            Re: RAW vs. raw image format Anton Shepelev <anton.txt@gmail.moc> - 2023-02-23 00:21 +0300
      Re: RAW vs. raw image format TonyCooper <tonycooper214@gmail.com> - 2023-02-19 16:30 -0500
      Re: RAW vs. raw image format Peter Moylan <peter@pmoylan.org.invalid> - 2023-02-24 18:18 +1100

csiph-web