Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #268779
| From | Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: Is Linux A Cult? |
| Date | 2014-11-25 02:17 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <20141125021718.33461240@maxa-pc> (permalink) |
| References | (4 earlier) <ldd5cles72ok$.17u0vy1vstchw.dlg@40tude.net> <20141125011945.515fc1ca@maxa-pc> <D0991BD2.41AFD%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> <20141125014008.2c215c3b@maxa-pc> <D0992186.41B1C%usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> |
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 17:55:18 -0700 Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> wrote: > On 11/24/14, 5:40 PM, in article 20141125014008.2c215c3b@maxa-pc, > "Melzzzzz" <mel@zzzzz.com> wrote: > > ... > >>> What leader? > >> > >> You pretend to not know it is Stallman. > > > > Stallman? Don't make me laugh... > > Laugh all you want. > > But know you, I, and everyone in COLA knows you will fail at a trivial > challenge - show how the herd members of COLA have been willing to > denounce Stallman's advocacy of child sexual abuse and other > repulsive comments about sex and children / teens. Stallman speaks for himself about that matters. > > Yes. You will fail. This is 100% assured because the herd refuses to > speak honestly of their cult-like leader. Stallman is also not good advocate at all. > > >>>> Both have a distended, warped view of their subject matter. > >>> > >>> How so? > >> > >> For one: look at how they blame the boogieman for the lack of > >> success of desktop Linux. > > > > Desktop Linux is success. How well it is supported by industry > > it can be considered success. > > And yet we see repeated whining about how some boogieman, usually MS, > has somehow stopped Linux from being a success in the market. Microsoft is trying to stop Linux to became serious competitor on the PC desktop and you know it. > > >>>> Both are obsessed with something that most people know nothing > >>>> about. > >>> > >>> Not really. > >> > >> Absolutely. Most people do not care one whit about desktop Linux > >> because it is of little or no value to them. > > > > >>>> Both believe that they are right and everyone else is wrong. > >>> > >>> No. > >> > >> Please show where they herd has admitted outsiders are right. > > > > This is bold statement. > > And that is you failing. It was 100% predictable you would fail. How so? > > >>>> Both insist on proselytizing or converting every single person > >>>> into the fold. > >>> > >>> No. > >> > >>>> Both have a warped view of the economy. IOW give everything away > >>>> for free. > >>> > >>> No. > >> > >> Not everything... but Stallman says not giving some types of > >> property away is immoral. > > > > Stallman has very little influence. > > And yet you cannot show where the herd denounces his advocacy of child > sexual abuse and other repulsive comments about sex and children / > teens. Anyone can denounce that. Heck Ubuntu is still most installed distro despite Stallman... > > >>>> Both have socialistic tendencies. > >>> > >>> No. > >> > >> More like Communist ... though this does not mean they support all > >> Communist ideals. > > > > Communist ideal is monopoly and monolit strong state. > > If you want to be precise anarchy is what I want, > > not communism ;) > > Stallman pushes forcing some private property into communal hands. > That is a Communist ideal (though he does not push this for all > private property... as I said, I am not saying he and his followers > support all Communist ideals). Communist ideals are not Open Source and Free Software. Communist ideals are dictatorship of state. Remember that? Ideals of open source and free software are anti monopoly, and freedom of software use. Sure , microsoft would not like that because then you can't build multi billion empire with starting capital of 50k$ > > >>>> Both seem to attract oddballs, social misfits and the mentally > >>>> ill. > >>> > >>> Not true. > >> > >> Look at this forum to know it is true. > > > > You Wintrolls are like that, sure... > > How do you even begin to think I am a "Wintroll"? And heck, what > makes you think I fit in with the non-herd members of COLA? I can;t see you advocating pro Linux, and against Windows, rather opposite... > > >>>> Both encourage obsessive behavior and total devotion to the > >>>> cause. > >>> > >>> False. > >> > >> You are either with the herd or an enemy of the herd. There is > >> little if any middle ground. > > > > Not true. > > By all means show examples. This is completely individual. Cannot be generalized at all. > > >>>> Both disparage and try to discredit the mainstream or > >>>> competition. > >>> > >>> Somewhat true. > >> > >> Very much true. > > > > You say,,, > > Correct. Look at how Windows and OS X are attacked over and over... > often for minor things... things much less problematic than the norm > of desktop Linux. This is advocacy group, remember? > > >>>> Both have a militaristic attitude of you are either with us 100 > >>>> percent or against us. > >>> > >>> Not true. > >> > >> Give some counter examples. > > > > Marti? > > He was with the herd... then he spoke out against them and was deemed > an enemy. Not true. > > > > > You are iCultist... and natural Wintroll > > So what views does one have to be in those groups? By all means list > them. I will be happy to say if I agree or disagree... and even give > some details on the ones with nuances. You are asking me to devote some time on it ;) No, I won;t... > > My guess: you run from that. You cannot actually list any. You are > simply pushing a cult-supported label that has no real meaning. As > you do so you are backing my claims. Prove me wrong and list the > beliefs. This conversation is proof. > > Ball is in your court... and I think even with this clarity you will > just make excuses, working even harder to prove me right. Oh, you are really devoted! > >
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. TomB <tommy.bongaerts@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 21:40 +0000
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-24 16:04 -0600
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-24 16:42 -0600
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 16:00 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-24 18:20 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-24 20:53 -0600
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:33 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 23:17 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:00 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:28 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 10:15 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 13:12 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 13:29 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 12:00 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 15:57 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 00:12 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Peter Köhlmann <peter-koehlmann@t-online.de> - 2014-11-25 00:19 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 16:24 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 00:24 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:38 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 18:46 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:37 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 20:09 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 16:32 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 00:34 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 16:48 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 00:57 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:37 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:44 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:05 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-25 00:08 +0000
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:16 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 19:19 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:24 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 16:29 -0800
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. WaRmNfUzZy <warmnfuzzi@muzzimail.net> - 2014-11-25 13:12 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:39 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:46 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:02 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:20 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:51 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:32 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 17:22 -0800
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:33 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Tattoo Vampire <sitting@this.computer> - 2014-11-25 00:32 +0000
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:42 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:56 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:20 +0100
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:42 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-25 10:31 +0000
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:05 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:30 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:48 -0800
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Bud Frede <frede@mouse-potato.com> - 2014-11-25 10:29 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-25 09:49 -0600
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:21 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:29 -0800
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 12:34 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:08 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 06:54 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:19 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:34 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-24 18:21 -0800
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 19:24 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 18:32 -0800
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-24 19:34 -0800
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:36 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2014-11-24 18:27 -0800
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 06:43 -0600
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 08:15 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:06 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-24 18:16 -0800
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 19:18 -0700
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-25 00:06 +0000
Re: Is Linux A Cult? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-24 19:13 -0500
Re: Is Linux A Cult? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:19 +0100
Re: Is Linux A Cult? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:30 -0700
Re: Is Linux A Cult? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:40 +0100
Re: Is Linux A Cult? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:55 -0700
Re: Is Linux A Cult? Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:17 +0100
Re: Is Linux A Cult? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 19:02 -0700
Re: Is Linux A Cult? vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-24 19:47 -0800
Re: Is Linux A Cult? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:55 -0700
Re: Is Linux A Cult? William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-25 10:21 +0000
Re: Is Linux A Cult? flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 08:22 -0500
Re: Is Linux A Cult? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:07 -0700
Re: Is Linux A Cult? Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:08 -0500
Re: Is Linux A Cult? Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:04 -0700
Buh bye for awhile for k00k feeding Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 08:13 -0500
Re: Buh bye for awhile for k00k feeding flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 09:25 -0500
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:15 +0100
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:44 -0700
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 01:53 +0100
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:58 -0700
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:27 +0100
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:39 -0700
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 20:26 -0500
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 18:40 -0700
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Melzzzzz <mel@zzzzz.com> - 2014-11-25 02:51 +0100
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. JEDIDIAH <jedi@nomad.mishnet> - 2014-11-24 20:56 -0600
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-24 22:17 -0500
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:27 -0700
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-24 22:20 -0500
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:30 -0700
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 20:23 -0700
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-11-25 03:08 -0800
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-11-25 05:21 -0800
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-25 08:30 -0500
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. -hh <recscuba_google@huntzinger.com> - 2014-11-25 02:50 -0800
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 10:26 -0700
Re: The iCultists are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 17:33 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 06:52 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-24 15:55 -0700
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2014-11-24 17:56 -0800
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. William Poaster <wp@dev.null> - 2014-11-25 10:29 +0000
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 09:06 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 08:29 -0600
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2014-11-25 09:46 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-25 09:53 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 08:48 -0600
The COLA trolls are a nasty, deranged, frothing herd. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 10:14 -0500
Re: The COLA trolls are a nasty, deranged, frothing herd. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 10:18 -0500
Re: The COLA trolls are a nasty, deranged, frothing herd. "Ezekiel" <zeke@nosuchemail.com> - 2014-11-25 10:34 -0500
Re: The COLA trolls are a nasty, deranged, frothing herd. flatfish+++ <phlatphish@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-25 11:29 -0500
Re: The COLA trolls are a nasty, deranged, frothing herd. chrisv <chrisv@nospam.invalid> - 2014-11-25 10:00 -0600
Re: The COLA trolls are a nasty, deranged, frothing herd. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 12:38 -0500
Re: The COLA trolls are a nasty, deranged, frothing herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:15 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Sir Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2014-11-25 11:11 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2014-11-25 06:50 -0500
Re: The COLA "advocates" are a cult-like herd. Snit <usenet@gallopinginsanity.com> - 2014-11-25 09:24 -0700
csiph-web