Re: implicit promotion

From	Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com>
Organization	Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd.
Newsgroups	comp.lang.c++
Date	2011-05-30 17:36 -1000
Message-ID	<2011053017364047009-pete@versatilecodingcom> (permalink)
References	<irusp0$6pi$1@reader1.panix.com> <is1fvt$pn2$1@reader1.panix.com>
Subject	Re: implicit promotion

Show all headers | View raw

On 2011-05-30 15:24:13 -1000, Ruben Safir said:

> On Mon, 30 May 2011 09:23:52 -1000, Pete Becker wrote:
> 
>> Nobody's bothered by 3*(1/3) not being 1, but somehow there's a
>> perception that there's something unsavory about 10*(1.0/10.0) not
>> having to be 1, even though it's exactly the same issue.
> 
> These are both huge problems that really shouldn't happen.  It's crazy.
> You have to do 3 *(1.0f/3.0f) in order to get a mathmatically valid
> calculation that a standard calculator does.
> 
> Just nuts...

Actually, the "standard calculator" is lying to you. It didn't get 1.0, 
but it rounded the value to display it. Try subtracting 1.0 from that 
result.

-- 
  Pete
Roundhouse Consulting, Ltd. (www.versatilecoding.com) Author of "The 
Standard C++ Library Extensions: a Tutorial and Reference 
(www.petebecker.com/tr1book)

Back to comp.lang.c++ | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

implicit promotion Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-30 01:44 +0000
  Re: implicit promotion red floyd <no.spam.here@its.invalid> - 2011-05-29 20:35 -0700
    Re: implicit promotion ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-30 00:01 -0400
      Re: implicit promotion Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-30 16:08 +1200
        Re: implicit promotion Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-05-30 01:18 -0500
          Re: implicit promotion Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-05-30 11:45 +0000
            Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 05:49 -0700
              Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 08:58 -1000
                Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 12:01 -0700
                Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 12:07 -0700
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:07 -1000
                Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 12:13 -0700
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:27 -1000
            Re: implicit promotion Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-05-30 10:17 -0500
              Re: implicit promotion Juha Nieminen <nospam@thanks.invalid> - 2011-05-30 18:20 +0000
                Re: implicit promotion Paavo Helde <myfirstname@osa.pri.ee> - 2011-05-30 14:06 -0500
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:23 -1000
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:29 -1000
                Re: implicit promotion Ruben Safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-31 01:24 +0000
                Re: implicit promotion Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2011-05-31 13:30 +1200
                Re: implicit promotion ruben safir <ruben@mrbrklyn.com> - 2011-05-31 00:52 -0400
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 17:36 -1000
              Re: implicit promotion Öö Tiib <ootiib@hot.ee> - 2011-05-30 11:39 -0700
                Re: implicit promotion Pete Becker <pete@versatilecoding.com> - 2011-05-30 09:02 -1000

csiph-web