Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3991
| From | news@zzo38computer.org.invalid |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.postscript |
| Subject | Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") |
| Date | 2024-03-07 15:05 -0800 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <1709852337.bystand@zzo38computer.org> (permalink) |
| References | <1705687027.bystand@zzo38computer.org> <usbjbe$t2sj$1@dont-email.me> |
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> wrote: > Get rid of the whole graphics API. It doesn't serve any useful purpose any > more. I still use it sometimes, although I also write programs in PostScript that do not use the graphics, too (PostScript is useful for programs with and without graphics). I still think it is good, although some improvements could be made, which I mentioned in my message. If you do not use the graphics API, how do you think would be improvement, if you want to use graphics, then? > NeWS was obsoleted by Display PostScript, and even Display PostScript > isn't worth using now. There are a few good ideas, though, which is why I have mentioned some of them. -- Don't laugh at the moon when it is day time in France.
Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2024-03-06 20:59 -0800
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-07 05:29 +0000
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2024-03-07 15:05 -0800
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-07 23:38 +0000
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2024-03-08 12:00 -0800
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-08 20:53 +0000
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") David Newall <ghostscript@davidnewall.com> - 2024-03-26 16:20 +1100
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2024-03-25 23:10 -0700
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-26 06:20 +0000
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") rlhamil@smart.net (Richard L. Hamilton) - 2024-05-25 16:07 +0000
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-05-25 22:31 +0000
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> - 2024-03-21 07:31 +0000
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") Bozo User <anthk@disroot.org> - 2024-03-24 20:45 +0000
Re: Ideas of a new version of PostScript (called "Computer PostScript") David Newall <ghostscript@davidnewall.com> - 2024-03-26 16:19 +1100
csiph-web