Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.postscript > #3666

Re: getopt.ps

Show all headers | View raw

luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is interesting code (and it's great to see people writing PS!). 
> But I'm not sure if it's actually very useful. If you're using ghostscript,
> you can combine the ARGUMENTS form with -D definitions, so you
> don't really need to parse any option style syntax from the ARGUMENTS
> list. Just define those with -D and use ARGUMENTS for strings
> or filenames or whatever.

While that is true, I don't really like -d and -s for your own program's
options; the -d and -s are for setting the options of Ghostscript itself
(such as specifying what file or printer to use for graphical output, and
some other options).

-- 
Don't laugh at the moon when it is day time in France.

Back to comp.lang.postscript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar

Thread

getopt.ps news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2021-08-01 14:05 -0700
  Re: getopt.ps luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2021-08-04 23:17 -0700
    Re: getopt.ps luser droog <luser.droog@gmail.com> - 2021-08-06 22:15 -0700
    Re: getopt.ps news@zzo38computer.org.invalid - 2021-08-20 13:14 -0700
      Re: getopt.ps ken <ken@spamcop.net> - 2021-08-21 08:31 +0100

csiph-web