Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.databases.sybase > #544
| From | Antony <albion26.eve@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.databases.sybase |
| Subject | Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index |
| Date | 2011-10-26 14:15 -0700 |
| Organization | http://groups.google.com |
| Message-ID | <14191737.1148.1319663706441.JavaMail.geo-discussion-forums@prog16> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <0441ab89-31b7-4e38-94da-e2e00cec6527@y22g2000pri.googlegroups.com> <a1d20fba-bee6-426d-912f-60de41db5ce1@y8g2000yqf.googlegroups.com> <35748aeb-81c1-4050-8ac7-4bc2478b66e1@u24g2000pru.googlegroups.com> <0a11f6ac-93a1-47f9-9ce9-4d4c9630dcdd@x20g2000vbl.googlegroups.com> <9e0a8036-4a17-43c6-8fc6-d92404747c46@hv4g2000vbb.googlegroups.com> |
I think you need to give us the exact SQL you are using, as it doesn't seem obvious (at least to me) what you're really comparing. Also, can you tell us when the DOL table was last reorg'd? In a DOL table, a clustered index isn't truly clustered, and the efficiency of a range query will decrease over time as rows get deleted/forwarded etc.
Back to comp.databases.sybase | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index 1dg618 <1dg618@gmail.com> - 2011-10-18 17:44 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index bret_halford@msn.com - 2011-10-19 08:53 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem@gmail.com> - 2011-10-19 12:01 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index 1dg618 <1dg618@gmail.com> - 2011-10-19 13:27 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index 1dg618 <1dg618@gmail.com> - 2011-10-19 14:09 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index bret_halford@msn.com - 2011-10-20 11:52 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index 1dg618 <1dg618@gmail.com> - 2011-10-20 15:59 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem@gmail.com> - 2011-10-20 20:38 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem@gmail.com> - 2011-10-21 00:07 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index 1dg618 <1dg618@gmail.com> - 2011-10-21 08:19 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem@gmail.com> - 2011-10-21 19:17 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index 1dg618 <1dg618@gmail.com> - 2011-10-22 16:44 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index 1dg618 <1dg618@gmail.com> - 2011-10-26 05:55 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index Antony <albion26.eve@gmail.com> - 2011-10-26 14:15 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem@gmail.com> - 2011-10-28 22:54 -0700
Re: sp_primarykey vs. unique clustered index Derek Asirvadem <derek.asirvadem@gmail.com> - 2011-10-20 19:00 -0700
csiph-web