Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register
Groups > aus.computers > #73961
| From | Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | aus.computers |
| Subject | Re: Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 |
| Date | 2026-05-05 12:57 +0000 |
| Message-ID | <10td0fd.14qk.1@ID-201911.user.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <n5sqgvFoc0jU1@mid.individual.net> <b5dmscvsqb8w.rmi8usiekuqr$.dlg@40tude.net> |
JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, 5 May 2026 10:04:47 +1000, Axel wrote: > > <https://www.zdnet.com/article/microsoft-open-sources-dos-1-0-much-more-than-the-code/> > > All Microsoft's released MS-DOS source codes are not true open source. All > of them are missing the source code for the boot sector bootstrap code. Well, strictly speaking the boot sector bootstrap code is not part of MS-DOS, because it could boot any OS. But the fact that most of the time the boot sector bootstrap code will be *generated* by the relevant MS-DOS command (AFAIR 'SYS' in the old days) the point is rather theoretical/moot.
Back to aus.computers | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 Axel <none@not.here> - 2026-05-05 10:04 +1000
Re: Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2026-05-05 13:37 +0700
Re: Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-05-05 12:57 +0000
Re: Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-05-05 13:50 +0000
Re: Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2026-05-06 15:02 +0700
Re: Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-05-06 14:09 +0000
Re: Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 JJ <jj4public@gmail.com> - 2026-05-07 03:29 +0700
Re: Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 Keithr0 <nothing.to.see@here.com.au> - 2026-05-07 10:49 +1000
Re: Microsoft open sources DOS 1.0 Frank Slootweg <this@ddress.is.invalid> - 2026-05-07 12:24 +0000
csiph-web