Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > alt.america > #7396

Re: Joe and Jill Biden now optimally sexually compatible

From David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com>
Newsgroups alt.america, soc.culture.asian.american, soc.culture.african.american, soc.culture.mexican.american, alt.politics.sex, us.politics.elections
Subject Re: Joe and Jill Biden now optimally sexually compatible
Date 2024-03-14 03:52 -0230
Organization Eternal September
Message-ID <0001HW.2BA2CF420002C89770000DC0138F@news.eternal-september.org> (permalink)
References <0001HW.2B9AD9A8005E863C70000880838F@news.eternal-september.org> <0001HW.2B9BF989008CCE2570000880838F@news.eternal-september.org>

Cross-posted to 6 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On Mar 8, 2024, David Dalton wrote
(in article<0001HW.2B9BF989008CCE2570000880838F@news.eternal-september.org>):

> On Mar 8, 2024, David Dalton wrote
> (in article<0001HW.2B9AD9A8005E863C70000880838F@news.eternal-september.org>):
>
> > Here is an excerpt from my
> > “International Women’s Day attempt” thread
> > on alt.religion.druid, that might be of interest:
> >
> > But note that time has advanced such that Joe and Jill Biden
> > no longer have had at least one temporary breakup of more
> > than a week in the last five years, so in A-HDBE Joe went
> > from straight-type-1-M to straight-type-2-M and is now
> > optimally compatible with bif (woman attracted to both
> > genders) Jill, and they have not been broken up. Thus my
> > matches of a few years ago of Joe to Bette Midler and
> > Jill to Ron Howard are no longer valid. And the optimal
> > sexual compatibility should contribute to their physical
> > and mental health. Yes, b’y, then. :-)
> >
> > However, they won’t be locked for life until they next have sex.
>
> I jumped the gun last night, but the above should now
> be true, as of 8:34 p.m. EST March 8, 2024, the
> fifth anniversary of the start of my first accurate
> matchmaking period (and International Women’s Day).
>
> They can test optimal sexual compatibility by
> electric, warming, compatible touch, increased
> attraction, and increased orgasm intensity.
>
> Why would they have been broken up? As a country
> leader, Joe Biden is an assisted shaktipat recipient (a.s.r.).
> And a.s.r. will lose partial sexual compatibility, so
> relationships involving at least one a.s.r. that are
> not optimally sexually compatible to start with or
> made so by (A,F)-HDBE will be broken up. So it is
> not that the relationship has been abusive.
>
> On the other hand, Donald and Melania Trump (neither
> of whom is an a.s.r.) have been separated across
> species boundaries in the species split, so their
> relationship must have been abusive. A good match
> for Melania is Chris Isaak, and a good match for
> Donald is Sarah Palin.

I am trying again in the thread “St.Patrick’s Week attempt”
on alt.religion.druid, and the above should now be true.

-- 
David Dalton dalton@nfld.com https://www.nfld.com/~dalton (home page)
https://www.nfld.com/~dalton/dtales.html Salmon on the Thorns (mystic page)
“And the cart is on a wheel; And the wheel is on a hill;
And the hill is shifting sand; And inside these laws we stand" (Ferron)

Back to alt.america | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Find similar


Thread

Joe and Jill Biden now optimally sexually compatible David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2024-03-08 01:59 -0330
  Re: Joe and Jill Biden now optimally sexually compatible David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2024-03-08 22:27 -0330
    Re: Joe and Jill Biden now optimally sexually compatible David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2024-03-14 03:52 -0230

csiph-web