Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > uk.misc > #68964 > unrolled thread

Shocking discovery

Started by"Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net>
First post2024-04-01 20:43 +0000
Last post2024-04-22 08:37 -0600
Articles 20 on this page of 40 — 6 participants

Back to article view | Back to uk.misc


Contents

  Shocking discovery "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> - 2024-04-01 20:43 +0000
    Re: Shocking discovery Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-15 11:52 -0600
      Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-15 20:31 +0100
        Re: Shocking discovery Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-16 10:30 -0600
          Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-16 22:18 +0100
            Re: Shocking discovery Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-16 16:26 -0600
              Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-16 23:46 +0100
                Re: Shocking discovery Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-17 09:27 -0600
                  Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-17 21:57 +0100
                    Re: Shocking discovery Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-17 16:39 -0600
                      Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-18 00:38 +0100
                        Re: Shocking discovery Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-18 14:37 -0600
                          Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-18 22:21 +0100
                            Re: Shocking discovery Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-18 15:54 -0600
                              Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-18 23:29 +0100
                                Re: Shocking discovery Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-19 08:45 -0600
                                  Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-20 01:27 +0100
                                    Re: Shocking discovery Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-20 11:08 -0600
                                      Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-21 01:01 +0100
                                        Re: Shocking discovery "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-21 10:00 -0600
                                          Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-21 22:15 +0100
                                            Re: Shocking discovery "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-21 15:45 -0600
                                              Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-21 23:08 +0100
                                                Re: Shocking discovery "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-21 16:55 -0600
                                                  Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-22 00:26 +0100
                                                    Re: Shocking discovery "Kerr-Mudd, John" <admin@127.0.0.1> - 2024-04-22 10:10 +0100
                                                      Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-22 15:01 +0100
                                                        Re: Shocking discovery "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-22 08:40 -0600
                                                          Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-23 20:15 +0100
                                                            Re: Shocking discovery "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-24 09:51 -0600
                                                              Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-24 20:13 +0100
                                                                Re: Shocking discovery "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-25 13:41 -0600
                                                      Re: Shocking discovery "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-22 08:38 -0600
                                                    Re: Shocking discovery "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-22 08:37 -0600
                                                  Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-30 13:09 +0100
                                                    Re: Shocking discovery "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-30 14:18 -0600
                                                      Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-05-13 13:19 +0100
                                              Re: Shocking discovery Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> - 2024-04-22 07:26 +0100
                                                Re: Shocking discovery snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) - 2024-04-22 15:05 +0100
                                                Re: Shocking discovery "Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos> - 2024-04-22 08:37 -0600

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →


#68964 — Shocking discovery

From"Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net>
Date2024-04-01 20:43 +0000
SubjectShocking discovery
Message-ID<uuf6a2$9db$1@reader1.panix.com>
Over the past few decades, great strides have been made in DNA
analysis and in data science.  Analysis of the DNA of living members
of the royal families of Europe have allowed reconstruction of their
earlier and earlier ancestors.

This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns out that William
the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e. his parents were not married to
each other!

This of course means that none of his descendants were or are rightful
kings or queens or the ancestors thereof.  This includes Princess
Sophia of the Palatinate, Electress of Hanover.  By current law, all
British monarchs must be her descendants.  This creates a problem.

Parliament is working late to change that law, replacing her with
Alfred the Great.  The entire British population will them be checked
to see who is most closely related to him.  That person will become
the new British king or queen (if they're a member of the Church of
England, of course).  If you're British and a church member, please
spit in a cup and mail it to Buckingham Palace for DNA analysis.
Thanks.

Of course this means that all laws that were ratified by monarchs
since 1066 are hereby null and void, and the laws have reverted to
those extant in 1065.  If you are fluent in Old English, please
report to Parliament for translation duty.  Thanks.
-- 
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]


#68965

FromLil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos>
Date2024-04-15 11:52 -0600
Message-ID<20240415115257.2ae05a32@234567aaa>
In reply to#68964
On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:43:46 -0000 (UTC)
"Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:

> This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns out that William
> the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e. his parents were not married to
> each other!

This differs from the rest of your balding, weak-chinned, royal reptiles
in just what way?

:-0

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68966

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2024-04-15 20:31 +0100
Message-ID<1qs2orm.11895s21ap9o03N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#68965
Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:

> On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:43:46 -0000 (UTC)
> "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> 
> > This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns out that William
> > the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e. his parents were not married to
> > each other!
> 
> This differs from the rest of your balding, weak-chinned, royal reptiles
> in just what way?
> 
> :-0

I think you'll find that the British Royal Family are actually
hemi-reptiloids.   HTH  HAND  HORSE

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe, PA, FIBS      -      Professional Crastinator 

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68967

FromLil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos>
Date2024-04-16 10:30 -0600
Message-ID<20240416103027.11238821@234567aaa>
In reply to#68966
On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:31:11 +0100
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:43:46 -0000 (UTC)
> > "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> >   
> > > This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns out that
> > > William the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e. his parents were not
> > > married to each other!  
> > 
> > This differs from the rest of your balding, weak-chinned, royal
> > reptiles in just what way?
> > 
> > :-0  
> 
> I think you'll find that the British Royal Family are actually
> hemi-reptiloids.   HTH  HAND  HORSE
> 

I know this to be so, yes.

David Icke much?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68968

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2024-04-16 22:18 +0100
Message-ID<1qs4olx.50ljyw4cfzmyN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#68967
Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:

> On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:31:11 +0100
> snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> 
> > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:43:46 -0000 (UTC)
> > > "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns out that
> > > > William the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e. his parents were not
> > > > married to each other!  
> > > 
> > > This differs from the rest of your balding, weak-chinned, royal
> > > reptiles in just what way?
> > > 
> > > :-0  
> > 
> > I think you'll find that the British Royal Family are actually
> > hemi-reptiloids.   HTH  HAND  HORSE
> > 
> 
> I know this to be so, yes.
> 
> David Icke much?
>

It's the turquoise robes that are so appealing.

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe, PA, FIBS      -      Professional Crastinator 

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68969

FromLil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos>
Date2024-04-16 16:26 -0600
Message-ID<20240416162628.10cec2b8@234567aaa>
In reply to#68968
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 22:18:35 +0100
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> 
> > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:31:11 +0100
> > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> >   
> > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:43:46 -0000 (UTC)
> > > > "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> > > >     
> > > > > This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns out that
> > > > > William the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e. his parents were
> > > > > not married to each other!    
> > > > 
> > > > This differs from the rest of your balding, weak-chinned, royal
> > > > reptiles in just what way?
> > > > 
> > > > :-0    
> > > 
> > > I think you'll find that the British Royal Family are actually
> > > hemi-reptiloids.   HTH  HAND  HORSE
> > >   
> > 
> > I know this to be so, yes.
> > 
> > David Icke much?
> >  
> 
> It's the turquoise robes that are so appealing.
> 

Heh...they wear those in Glammis Castle, don't they.

https://thelittlehouseofhorrors.com/glamis-castle/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68970

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2024-04-16 23:46 +0100
Message-ID<1qs4sil.1depden181ly6lN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#68969
Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 22:18:35 +0100
> snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> 
> > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:31:11 +0100
> > > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > > >   
> > > > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:43:46 -0000 (UTC)
> > > > > "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> > > > >     
> > > > > > This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns out that
> > > > > > William the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e. his parents were
> > > > > > not married to each other!    
> > > > > 
> > > > > This differs from the rest of your balding, weak-chinned, royal
> > > > > reptiles in just what way?
> > > > > 
> > > > > :-0    
> > > > 
> > > > I think you'll find that the British Royal Family are actually
> > > > hemi-reptiloids.   HTH  HAND  HORSE
> > > >   
> > > 
> > > I know this to be so, yes.
> > > 
> > > David Icke much?
> > >  
> > 
> > It's the turquoise robes that are so appealing.
> > 
> 
> Heh...they wear those in Glammis Castle, don't they.
> 
> <https://thelittlehouseofhorrors.com/glamis-castle/>
>

"Earl Beardie was a cruel man.  One day, he and his friends were
 bored and they decided to have some fun.  One of the black servants
 was stripped naked and forced to run around the castle grounds."

Running true to form, then.  That's ginger beards for you, eh?

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe, PA, FIBS      -      Professional Crastinator 

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68971

FromLil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos>
Date2024-04-17 09:27 -0600
Message-ID<20240417092727.1a71897b@234567aaa>
In reply to#68970
On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:46:17 +0100
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 22:18:35 +0100
> > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> >   
> > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:31:11 +0100
> > > > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> > > >     
> > > > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > > > >     
> > > > > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:43:46 -0000 (UTC)
> > > > > > "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> > > > > >       
> > > > > > > This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns out
> > > > > > > that William the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e. his
> > > > > > > parents were not married to each other!      
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > This differs from the rest of your balding, weak-chinned,
> > > > > > royal reptiles in just what way?
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > :-0      
> > > > > 
> > > > > I think you'll find that the British Royal Family are actually
> > > > > hemi-reptiloids.   HTH  HAND  HORSE
> > > > >     
> > > > 
> > > > I know this to be so, yes.
> > > > 
> > > > David Icke much?
> > > >    
> > > 
> > > It's the turquoise robes that are so appealing.
> > >   
> > 
> > Heh...they wear those in Glammis Castle, don't they.
> > 
> > <https://thelittlehouseofhorrors.com/glamis-castle/>
> >  
> 
> "Earl Beardie was a cruel man.  One day, he and his friends were
>  bored and they decided to have some fun.  One of the black servants
>  was stripped naked and forced to run around the castle grounds."
> 
> Running true to form, then.  That's ginger beards for you, eh?
> 

Too berloody right it is!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68972

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2024-04-17 21:57 +0100
Message-ID<1qs6i5n.wp4vm97t1nnnN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#68971
Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:

> On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:46:17 +0100
> snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> 
> > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 22:18:35 +0100
> > > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> > >   
> > > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > > >   
> > > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:31:11 +0100
> > > > > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> > > > >     
> > > > > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > > > > >     
> > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:43:46 -0000 (UTC)
> > > > > > > "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> > > > > > >       
> > > > > > > > This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns out
> > > > > > > > that William the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e. his
> > > > > > > > parents were not married to each other!      
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > This differs from the rest of your balding, weak-chinned,
> > > > > > > royal reptiles in just what way?
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > :-0      
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I think you'll find that the British Royal Family are actually
> > > > > > hemi-reptiloids.   HTH  HAND  HORSE
> > > > > >     
> > > > > 
> > > > > I know this to be so, yes.
> > > > > 
> > > > > David Icke much?
> > > > >    
> > > > 
> > > > It's the turquoise robes that are so appealing.
> > > >   
> > > 
> > > Heh...they wear those in Glammis Castle, don't they.
> > > 
> > > <https://thelittlehouseofhorrors.com/glamis-castle/>
> > >  
> > 
> > "Earl Beardie was a cruel man.  One day, he and his friends were
> >  bored and they decided to have some fun.  One of the black servants
> >  was stripped naked and forced to run around the castle grounds."
> > 
> > Running true to form, then.  That's ginger beards for you, eh?
> > 
> 
> Too berloody right it is!
>

There's one of them, the [ahem] ginger sheep of the family, who 
legged it to the colonies and took up with some bit-part "actress".
No wonder the rest of the family disowned him.

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe, PA, FIBS      -      Professional Crastinator 

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68973

FromLil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos>
Date2024-04-17 16:39 -0600
Message-ID<20240417163943.4b67e6bc@234567aaa>
In reply to#68972
On Wed, 17 Apr 2024 21:57:07 +0100
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> 
> > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 23:46:17 +0100
> > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> >   
> > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > On Tue, 16 Apr 2024 22:18:35 +0100
> > > > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> > > >     
> > > > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > > > >     
> > > > > > On Mon, 15 Apr 2024 20:31:11 +0100
> > > > > > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> > > > > >       
> > > > > > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > > > > > >       
> > > > > > > > On Mon, 1 Apr 2024 20:43:46 -0000 (UTC)
> > > > > > > > "Keith F. Lynch" <kfl@KeithLynch.net> wrote:
> > > > > > > >         
> > > > > > > > > This has resulting in a shocking discovery.  It turns
> > > > > > > > > out that William the Conqueror was illegitimate, i.e.
> > > > > > > > > his parents were not married to each other!        
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > This differs from the rest of your balding,
> > > > > > > > weak-chinned, royal reptiles in just what way?
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > :-0        
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > I think you'll find that the British Royal Family are
> > > > > > > actually hemi-reptiloids.   HTH  HAND  HORSE
> > > > > > >       
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > I know this to be so, yes.
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > David Icke much?
> > > > > >      
> > > > > 
> > > > > It's the turquoise robes that are so appealing.
> > > > >     
> > > > 
> > > > Heh...they wear those in Glammis Castle, don't they.
> > > > 
> > > > <https://thelittlehouseofhorrors.com/glamis-castle/>
> > > >    
> > > 
> > > "Earl Beardie was a cruel man.  One day, he and his friends were
> > >  bored and they decided to have some fun.  One of the black
> > > servants was stripped naked and forced to run around the castle
> > > grounds."
> > > 
> > > Running true to form, then.  That's ginger beards for you, eh?
> > >   
> > 
> > Too berloody right it is!
> >  
> 
> There's one of them, the [ahem] ginger sheep of the family, who 
> legged it to the colonies and took up with some bit-part "actress".
> No wonder the rest of the family disowned him.
> 

Methinks he had less reptile blood and the pornlet almost none..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68974

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2024-04-18 00:38 +0100
Message-ID<1qs6o6u.2xwcx91pr0uniN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#68973
Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:

> snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
[...]
> > > > Running true to form, then.  That's ginger beards for you, eh?
> > > >   
> > > 
> > > Too berloody right it is!
> > >  
> > 
> > There's one of them, the [ahem] ginger sheep of the family, who 
> > legged it to the colonies and took up with some bit-part "actress".
> > No wonder the rest of the family disowned him.
> > 
> 
> Methinks he had less reptile blood and the pornlet almost none..
>

Quite likely; I heard of a report (obviously a scurrilous lie) 
that somebody had a tryst in a Devon cottage in the '80s.

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe, PA, FIBS      -      Professional Crastinator 

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68975

FromLil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos>
Date2024-04-18 14:37 -0600
Message-ID<20240418143753.252430d3@234567aaa>
In reply to#68974
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 00:38:56 +0100
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> 
> > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:  
> [...]
> > > > > Running true to form, then.  That's ginger beards for you, eh?
> > > > >     
> > > > 
> > > > Too berloody right it is!
> > > >    
> > > 
> > > There's one of them, the [ahem] ginger sheep of the family, who 
> > > legged it to the colonies and took up with some bit-part
> > > "actress". No wonder the rest of the family disowned him.
> > >   
> > 
> > Methinks he had less reptile blood and the pornlet almost none..
> >  
> 
> Quite likely; I heard of a report (obviously a scurrilous lie) 
> that somebody had a tryst in a Devon cottage in the '80s.
> 
I bet Clarkson was involved!

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68976

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2024-04-18 22:21 +0100
Message-ID<1qs8dst.1rqppoqu24ik6N%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#68975
Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
[...]
> > Quite likely; I heard of a report (obviously a scurrilous lie) 
> > that somebody had a tryst in a Devon cottage in the '80s.
>  
> I bet Clarkson was involved!

If he was, it would probably be to film it for Nextfil or Azanom.

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe, PA, FIBS      -      Professional Crastinator 

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68977

FromLil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos>
Date2024-04-18 15:54 -0600
Message-ID<20240418155409.06a82a0e@234567aaa>
In reply to#68976
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 22:21:33 +0100
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> [...]
> > > Quite likely; I heard of a report (obviously a scurrilous lie) 
> > > that somebody had a tryst in a Devon cottage in the '80s.  
> >  
> > I bet Clarkson was involved!  
> 
> If he was, it would probably be to film it for Nextfil or Azanom.
> 

Well you saw how excited he was by the man fucking the donkey down in
Columbia, so...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68978

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2024-04-18 23:29 +0100
Message-ID<1qs8h5v.1r0lmycq2vyiuN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#68977
Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:

> snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > Quite likely; I heard of a report (obviously a scurrilous lie) 
> > > > that somebody had a tryst in a Devon cottage in the '80s.  
> > >  
> > > I bet Clarkson was involved!  
> > 
> > If he was, it would probably be to film it for Nextfil or Azanom.
> 
> Well you saw how excited he was by the man
> fscking the donkey down in Columbia, so...

Whoah, let me remind you that you're in the UK now, Buster.

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe, PA, FIBS      -      Professional Crastinator 

My pet rock Gordon just is.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68979

FromLil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos>
Date2024-04-19 08:45 -0600
Message-ID<20240419084554.0162b2e8@234567aaa>
In reply to#68978
On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:29:52 +0100
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> 
> > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:  
> > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > > [...]  
> > > > > Quite likely; I heard of a report (obviously a scurrilous
> > > > > lie) that somebody had a tryst in a Devon cottage in the
> > > > > '80s.    
> > > >  
> > > > I bet Clarkson was involved!    
> > > 
> > > If he was, it would probably be to film it for Nextfil or Azanom.
> > >  
> > 
> > Well you saw how excited he was by the man
> > fscking the donkey down in Columbia, so...  
> 
> Whoah, let me remind you that you're in the UK now, Buster.
> 

Well yeah, Jeremy and his mates had to go on the "grand tour" to
externalize their kinks. did you see the episode I mention? It's rather
hard to unsee it, once viewed.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68980

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2024-04-20 01:27 +0100
Message-ID<1qsahat.1smtgxt1wcgg3xN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#68979
Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:

> On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:29:52 +0100
> snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> 
> > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > 
> > > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:  
> > > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > > > [...]  
> > > > > > Quite likely; I heard of a report (obviously a scurrilous
> > > > > > lie) that somebody had a tryst in a Devon cottage in the
> > > > > > '80s.    
> > > > >  
> > > > > I bet Clarkson was involved!    
> > > > 
> > > > If he was, it would probably be to film it for Nextfil or Azanom.
> > > 
> > > Well you saw how excited he was by the man
> > > fscking the donkey down in Columbia, so...  
> > 
> > Whoah, let me remind you that you're in the UK now, Buster.
> 
> Well yeah, Jeremy and his mates had to go on the "grand tour" to
> externalize their kinks. did you see the episode I mention? It's rather
> hard to unsee it, once viewed.

Nope, no need for mind bleach here, TYVM.

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe, PA, FIBS      -      Professional Crastinator 

My pet rock Gordon admires J. Alfred Prufrock.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68981

FromLil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos>
Date2024-04-20 11:08 -0600
Message-ID<20240420110841.215a1a11@234567aaa>
In reply to#68980
On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 01:27:58 +0100
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> 
> > On Thu, 18 Apr 2024 23:29:52 +0100
> > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:
> >   
> > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > >   
> > > > snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:    
> > > > > Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> > > > > [...]    
> > > > > > > Quite likely; I heard of a report (obviously a scurrilous
> > > > > > > lie) that somebody had a tryst in a Devon cottage in the
> > > > > > > '80s.      
> > > > > >  
> > > > > > I bet Clarkson was involved!      
> > > > > 
> > > > > If he was, it would probably be to film it for Nextfil or
> > > > > Azanom.  
> > > > 
> > > > Well you saw how excited he was by the man
> > > > fscking the donkey down in Columbia, so...    
> > > 
> > > Whoah, let me remind you that you're in the UK now, Buster.  
> > 
> > Well yeah, Jeremy and his mates had to go on the "grand tour" to
> > externalize their kinks. did you see the episode I mention? It's
> > rather hard to unsee it, once viewed.  
> 
> Nope, no need for mind bleach here, TYVM.
> 

Amen to that.

Sometimes travel TeeVee can be deceptively crass, even awful.

Their producers deserve a Jill Dando award - delivered to the doorstep,
yeah?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68982

Fromsnipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe)
Date2024-04-21 01:01 +0100
Message-ID<1qscaeg.1thfhxuqfrwyoN%snipeco.2@gmail.com>
In reply to#68981
Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
[...]
> > > > Whoah, let me remind you that you're in the UK now, Buster.  
> > > 
> > > Well yeah, Jeremy and his mates had to go on the "grand tour" to
> > > externalize their kinks. did you see the episode I mention? It's
> > > rather hard to unsee it, once viewed.  
> > 
> > Nope, no need for mind bleach here, TYVM.
> 
> Amen to that.
> 
> Sometimes travel TeeVee can be deceptively crass, even awful.
> 
> Their producers deserve a Jill Dando award - delivered to the doorstep,
> yeah?

They should die for their Art?  That's a tough verdict.  

From a commercial point of view, Top Gear was hugely successful
worldwide.  It says something about Western civilisation that we 
should take three overgrown schoolboys playing with cars so much 
into our hearts.  The decadentsia rule, OK!

-- 
^Ï^.       Sn!pe, PA, FIBS      -      Professional Crastinator 

My pet rock Gordon admires J. Alfred Prufrock.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#68983

From"Little@man.Ball" <suck@ra.mentos>
Date2024-04-21 10:00 -0600
Message-ID<20240421100004.19528d0a@234567aaa>
In reply to#68982
On Sun, 21 Apr 2024 01:01:27 +0100
snipeco.2@gmail.com (Sn!pe) wrote:

> Lil-man-ball <suck@ra.mentos> wrote:
> [...]
> > > > > Whoah, let me remind you that you're in the UK now, Buster.
> > > > >  
> > > > 
> > > > Well yeah, Jeremy and his mates had to go on the "grand tour" to
> > > > externalize their kinks. did you see the episode I mention? It's
> > > > rather hard to unsee it, once viewed.    
> > > 
> > > Nope, no need for mind bleach here, TYVM.  
> > 
> > Amen to that.
> > 
> > Sometimes travel TeeVee can be deceptively crass, even awful.
> > 
> > Their producers deserve a Jill Dando award - delivered to the
> > doorstep, yeah?  
> 
> They should die for their Art?  That's a tough verdict.  

I'm being facetious, but I do miss Jill's BBC work. It was first seen in
the states on our fledgling "Travel Channel: a national cable channel
circa early 1980s.

There was no BBC America to show us endless reruns of Star Trek TNG at
that time...

> From a commercial point of view, Top Gear was hugely successful
> worldwide.  

The most successful auto program ever, iirc.

> It says something about Western civilisation that we 
> should take three overgrown schoolboys playing with cars so much 
> into our hearts.  The decadentsia rule, OK!


Indeed they do, wishing that it ended with Hammond's messy crashes and
not common bestiality though.

Were you a fan of their forerunner, Final Gear?

https://forums.finalgear.com/

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | uk.misc


csiph-web