Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > uk.comp.sys.mac > #117479
| From | eastender <email@domain.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | uk.comp.sys.mac |
| Message-ID | <2017042812594026547-email@domaincom> (permalink) |
| References | <2017042313322060319-email@domaincom> <2017042716183731246-email@domaincom> <odut6e$70q$1@dont-email.me> <2017042809385968140-email@domaincom> <odv5m6$1h9$1@dont-email.me> |
| Subject | Re: Wireless switch recommendations |
| Organization | virginmedia.com |
| Date | 2017-04-28 12:59 +0100 |
On 2017-04-28 10:34:46 +0000, RJH said: > On 28/04/2017 09:38, eastender wrote: >> On 2017-04-28 08:09:50 +0000, RJH said: >> >>> On 27/04/2017 16:18, eastender wrote: >>>> Just had a brainwave - called Virgin and asked for a router upgrade. >>>> After a bit of haggling they agreed to send the latest Superhub 3 for >>>> £14.99. This has much better WiFi than the v1 Superhub 2 we have. They >>>> don't want the old one so I can use that as the gigabit switch and wifi >>>> point. >>>> >>> >>> Sounds good! >>> >>> I'd just add that from a quick/rough calculation, the electricity >>> saving would cover a new ethernet hub (to replace the superhub 2) in >>> well under a year. You would lose the heat effect of the superhub2 - >>> that may or may not matter. >> >> I hadn't thought about the power consumption - seems the Superhub 3 is >> at the upper end in consumption. Don't know about the 2. But I want to >> run two wireless systems so I won't need the standalone hub unless the 3 >> has great coverage which I doubt as we have a big 3 story house. >> > > I'd give it a go with just the 3 - my BT hub's (5 I think) wireless > connects (only 2 out of 3 bars on the iphone, though) across the > longest diagonal of my 3 storey house. Yes I will do. I have two wireless printers in my office and the main router is a long way from them so this will probably be the best test. At present though I can't get much of a signal from the Superhub 2 at 2.4 or 5 but it's not the ac version and 3 should also be a lot better.
Back to uk.comp.sys.mac | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar
Wireless switch recommendations eastender <email@domain.com> - 2017-04-23 13:32 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 10:57 -0400
Re: Wireless switch recommendations David Kennedy <davidkennedy@nospamherethankyou.invalid> - 2017-04-23 17:05 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> - 2017-04-23 12:15 -0400
Re: Wireless switch recommendations eastender <email@domain.com> - 2017-04-23 18:12 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2017-04-25 08:08 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations Krzysztof Staniorowski <nospam@ksx4system.net> - 2017-04-23 15:02 +0000
Re: Wireless switch recommendations eastender <email@domain.com> - 2017-04-23 18:13 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations Krzysztof Staniorowski <nospam@ksx4system.net> - 2017-04-23 19:23 +0000
Re: Wireless switch recommendations nospam@de-ster.demon.nl (J. J. Lodder) - 2017-04-24 21:24 +0200
Re: Wireless switch recommendations eastender <email@domain.com> - 2017-04-25 13:40 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations eastender <email@domain.com> - 2017-04-27 16:18 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations Jaimie Vandenbergh <jaimie@sometimes.sessile.org> - 2017-04-27 23:29 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2017-04-28 09:09 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations eastender <email@domain.com> - 2017-04-28 09:38 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations RJH <patchmoney@gmx.com> - 2017-04-28 11:34 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations eastender <email@domain.com> - 2017-04-28 12:59 +0100
Re: Wireless switch recommendations eastender <email@domain.com> - 2017-05-03 14:30 +0100
csiph-web