Groups | Search | Server Info | Login | Register


Groups > talk.religion.misc > #22357

Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day

From Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com>
Newsgroups alt.religion.scientology, alt.religion.scientology.xenu, rec.arts.sf.written, rec.arts.sf.misc, talk.religion.misc
Subject Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day
Date 2026-03-23 15:12 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Message-ID <10ps3an$dc4t$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <0001HW.2F63856F015C9E4D30B3F238F@news.eternal-september.org> <10pjjbj$1jru2$1@dont-email.me> <okdtrklgqd5uigvq4kchnkslmajq54g0h0@4ax.com> <10pmetl$2iijt$1@dont-email.me> <id40sk1hl9tlk9084mkq91htc655jdetrt@4ax.com>

Cross-posted to 5 groups.

Show all headers | View raw


On 3/22/2026 12:00 PM, Paul S Person wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Mar 2026 09:53:29 -0600, ShyDavid
> <noreply@murdermingle.com> wrote:
> 
>> On 2026/03/21 9:20 AM, Paul S Person wrote:
>>> On Fri, 20 Mar 2026 07:50:46 -0600, David Rice
>>> <noreply@murdermingle.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 2026/03/12 5:36 PM, David Dalton wrote:
>>>>> Happy L. Ron Hubbard Day (March 13) to SF fans and
>>>>> to scientologists.
>>>>    
>>>> "SF fans" do not read crap.
>>>>
>>>> {alt.atheism removed}
>>>
>>> I recently saw /Battlefield: Earth/. I skipped it when it came out
>>> because of the reviews and the competition (at the time I had the time
>>> to watch one new a week in a theater).
>>>
>>> It was better than I expected. A bit cartoony, but watchable. The
>>> story was easy to follow, which is better than being so badly done
>>> that you end up not knowing what was going on. IOW, I've seen worse
>>> films, oh yes indeed.
>>
>>
>> Gosh. I recall holysmoke.org has over 300 reviews, none of them positive. I suppose it has reached the "campy" state that makes the film good. :-)
> 
> My expectations were low, so being better than I expected does not
> necessarily make it "good". And "watchable" is not "good".
> 

My only memory of the film is the scene were the Good Guys find
hidden centuries-old Harrier Jump Jets, and are able to start
and use them in battle.

pt

Back to talk.religion.misc | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar


Thread

L. Ron Hubbard Day David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2026-03-12 21:06 -0230
  Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day David Rice <noreply@murdermingle.com> - 2026-03-20 07:50 -0600
    Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Bobbie Sellers <bliss-sf4ever@dslextreme.com> - 2026-03-20 09:21 -0700
    Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2026-03-20 20:09 -0230
      Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-03-20 22:09 -0400
      Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Pervert Alert <pervert@alert.invalid> - 2026-03-24 01:33 +0000
        Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2026-03-24 00:23 -0230
    Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-03-20 20:50 -0400
    Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2026-03-21 08:20 -0700
      Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day ShyDavid <noreply@murdermingle.com> - 2026-03-21 09:53 -0600
        Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Paul S Person <psperson@old.netcom.invalid> - 2026-03-22 09:00 -0700
          Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Cryptoengineer <petertrei@gmail.com> - 2026-03-23 15:12 -0400
            Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day kludge@panix.com (Scott Dorsey) - 2026-03-23 16:43 -0400
              Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day ted@loft.tnolan.com (Ted Nolan <tednolan>) - 2026-03-23 21:10 +0000
  Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day Pervert Alert <pervert@alert.invalid> - 2026-03-24 01:32 +0000
    Re: L. Ron Hubbard Day David Dalton <dalton@nfld.com> - 2026-03-24 00:21 -0230

csiph-web