Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > sci.physics > #890947 > unrolled thread

Knock, knock, who is it? Yi-Lightning

Started byMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
First post2025-01-28 01:36 +0100
Last post2025-02-08 11:45 -0600
Articles 20 on this page of 106 — 4 participants

Back to article view | Back to sci.physics


Contents

  Knock, knock, who is it? Yi-Lightning Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-01-28 01:36 +0100
    Europe has no AI, you sure? (Re: Knock, knock, who is it? Yi-Lightning) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-01-28 01:43 +0100
      Happy Chinese New Year! (Re: Europe has no AI, you sure?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-01-28 02:13 +0100
        Re: Happy Chinese New Year! (Re: Europe has no AI, you sure?) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-27 19:31 -0600
    Re: the asteroid that kills tech dinosaurs (Re: Knock, knock, who is it? Yi-Lightning) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 12:48 -0600
      Re: the asteroid that kills tech dinosaurs (Re: Knock, knock, who is it? Yi-Lightning) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 12:51 -0600
        DeepSex for Dooms Day Morons (Was: the asteroid that kills tech dinosaurs) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-01-31 23:40 +0100
          Where is bilinear? (Was: DeepSex for Dooms Day Morons) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-01 00:09 +0100
          Re: DeepSex for Dooms Day Morons (Was: the asteroid that kills tech dinosaurs) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-01-31 22:43 -0600
            How To Uninstall your Dooms Day Brain (Was: DeepSex for Dooms Day Morons) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-01 17:31 +0100
              Re: How To Uninstall your Dooms Day Brain (Was: DeepSex for Dooms Day Morons) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 11:04 -0600
                Re: How To Uninstall your Dooms Day Brain (Was: DeepSex for Dooms Day Morons) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-01 11:12 -0600
                  Re: How To Uninstall your Dooms Day Brain (Was: DeepSex for Dooms Day Morons) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-02 14:50 +0100
                    choice of a foreign functional currency (Was: How To Uninstall your Dooms Day Brain) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-02 14:55 +0100
                      Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull (Was: choice of a foreign functional currency) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-02 14:59 +0100
                        Re: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull (Was: choice of a foreign functional currency) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-02 15:05 +0100
                          Radical universalism and artificial intelligence (Was: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-04 11:19 +0100
                        Trump farts smell like mumies: Sweet and spicy (Was: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-18 20:59 +0100
                          Re: Trump farts smell like mumies: Sweet and spicy (Was: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-18 16:31 -0600
                            Re: Trump farts smell like mumies: Sweet and spicy bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor) - 2025-02-19 10:51 +0000
                            Re: Trump farts smell like mumies: Sweet and spicy (Was: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 15:31 -0600
                          A phone call to Mars in 2050 (Was: Trump farts smell like mumies: Sweet and spicy) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-19 22:07 +0100
                            The Baby Pill problem solved by Putin (Was: A phone call to Mars in 2050) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-20 13:11 +0100
                        Bitcoin sinking call the FBI (Was: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-25 16:24 +0100
                          Re: Bitcoin sinking call the FBI (Was: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 15:13 -0600
                            Re: Bitcoin sinking call the FBI hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) - 2025-02-25 21:32 +0000
                              Re: Bitcoin sinking call the FBI Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-25 15:51 -0600
                        China doesn't have some BTC (Was: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-08 11:03 +0100
                        BTC net is restructuring over time (Was: China doesn't have some BTC) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-08 11:11 +0100
                          Crooks will offload BTC to the state (Re: BTC net is restructuring over time) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-08 11:21 +0100
                        Bitcoin says thank you! (Was: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-29 00:15 +0100
                          Re: Bitcoin says thank you! (Was: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-28 18:35 -0500
                            Re: Bitcoin says thank you! (Was: Bitcoin crashing again / Gradual rug pull) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-03-29 12:58 -0500
                              greenland is garbage / iceland would be swell (Was: Bitcoin says thank you!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-31 12:11 +0200
                  Not only $TSLA is on fire sale! [The Decline of Prolog] (Re: How To Uninstall your Dooms Day Brain) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-03-14 13:42 +0100
        Some modern heros of DeepSeek (Re: the asteroid that kills tech dinosaurs) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-01-31 23:57 +0100
    Chinas secret weapon pulverizes Mira Murati (Re: Knock, knock, who is it? Yi-Lightning) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-02 16:37 +0100
    Re: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha (Re: Knock, knock, who is it? Yi-Lightning) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 15:15 -0600
      I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-04 23:31 +0100
        Corr.: now -> new (Was: I never post boring schooling) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-04 23:33 +0100
          Group Morons and the American Dream (Was: Corr.: now -> new) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-04 23:44 +0100
          Re: Group Morons and the American Dream (Was: Corr.: now -> new) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-04 23:51 +0100
        Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 17:03 -0600
          Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 17:14 -0600
            Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:09 +0100
              Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 18:23 -0600
                Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:25 +0100
                  Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 18:41 -0600
                    Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:45 +0100
                      Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 18:55 -0600
          you can suck my cock (Was: I never post boring schooling) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 00:14 +0100
            Re: you can suck my cock (Was: I never post boring schooling) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 18:12 -0600
              physics was interesting 100 years ago (Was: you can suck my cock) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:21 +0100
                Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:24 +0100
                  Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 18:44 -0600
                    Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:46 +0100
                      Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:47 +0100
                        Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 18:54 -0600
                          Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:56 +0100
                      Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 18:52 -0600
                        Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:57 +0100
                          Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 19:02 -0600
                            Can I be your newbie (Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:04 +0100
                              Should I go into a Library and make a Hardcopy (Was: Can I be your newbie) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:06 +0100
                                I have very bad news for you (Was: Should I go into a Library and make a Hardcopy) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:09 +0100
                                  Re: I have very bad news for you (Was: Should I go into a Library and make a Hardcopy) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 19:18 -0600
                                Re: Should I go into a Library and make a Hardcopy (Was: Can I be your newbie) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 19:15 -0600
                                  You are harassing me (Was: Should I go into a Library and make a Hardcopy) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:16 +0100
                                    DeepSex for AI Newbies (Re: You are harassing me) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:18 +0100
                                      Shitstorms where Shitstorms belong (Was: DeepSex for AI Newbies) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:19 +0100
                                        How To Uninstall a nagging Flaming (Was: Shitstorms where Shitstorms belong) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:21 +0100
                                          its your fault (Was: How To Uninstall a nagging Flaming) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:23 +0100
                                    Re: You are harassing me (Was: Should I go into a Library and make a Hardcopy) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 19:25 -0600
                                      You only got what you deserve (Was: You are harassing me) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:28 +0100
                                        Easy formula (Was: You only got what you deserve) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:30 +0100
                                          Re: Easy formula (Was: You only got what you deserve) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 19:34 -0600
                Re: physics was interesting 100 years ago (Was: you can suck my cock) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 18:38 -0600
                  Re: physics was interesting 100 years ago (Was: you can suck my cock) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:43 +0100
                    Re: physics was interesting 100 years ago (Was: you can suck my cock) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 18:50 -0600
                      Feel the Dark side of the Force (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:56 +0100
                        Re: Feel the Dark side of the Force (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 18:58 -0600
                          Can I be your newbie (Was: Feel the Dark side of the Force) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:59 +0100
                            Re: Can I be your newbie (Was: Feel the Dark side of the Force) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:00 +0100
                              Re: Can I be your newbie (Was: Feel the Dark side of the Force) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:03 +0100
                                Re: Can I be your newbie (Was: Feel the Dark side of the Force) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 19:12 -0600
                              Re: Can I be your newbie (Was: Feel the Dark side of the Force) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 19:08 -0600
                            Re: Can I be your newbie (Was: Feel the Dark side of the Force) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-04 19:06 -0600
                              Mother Theresa or Darth Vader? (Was: Can I be your newbie) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 02:15 +0100
    Newbies that work for Elon can never leave the sect (Was: Knock, knock, who is it? Yi-Lightning) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:05 +0100
      Re: Newbies that work for Elon can never leave the sect (Was: Knock, knock, who is it? Yi-Lightning) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-05 01:08 +0100
    Re: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals (Re: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 10:08 -0600
      Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 17:21 +0100
        Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 11:09 -0600
          Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 18:15 +0100
            Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 18:16 +0100
            Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 18:19 +0100
              Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 11:25 -0600
                Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 18:26 +0100
                  Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 11:35 -0600
                    Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 18:36 +0100
                      Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 18:38 +0100
                      Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 11:48 -0600
            Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 11:29 -0600
              Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 18:31 +0100
                Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-02-08 18:33 +0100
                  Re: Fuckfick physfitfreak@gmail.com sucks (Was: Machine Learning discovers Roman Numerals) Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> - 2025-02-08 11:45 -0600

Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →


#891114 — Group Morons and the American Dream (Was: Corr.: now -> new)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-04 23:44 +0100
SubjectGroup Morons and the American Dream (Was: Corr.: now -> new)
Message-ID<vnu58r$vb1u$1@solani.org>
In reply to#891113
Hi,

The biggest group morons are those that
dream that they can profit by relocating
from their own group of people,

to a group of american people, and then
cry when their assets get frozen or who
knows what happens. The papers I posted

are about automatically tuning into groups:

 > Group Preference Optimization
 > https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11523
 >
 > DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits
 > https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300

Its actually quite amazing how machine
learning can utilize group identification
to customize how a conversational software

agent interacts. Currently I think is a
variant of fine tuning, but on a different
model level that is called policy. The first

paper has a figure with the following groups:

- Hindu
- Jewish
- Liberal
- Asian

Have Fun!

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> Typo: now -> new
> 
>  > to generate now thinking
> 
> Should read:
> 
>  > to generate new thinking
> 
> I shit and piss on some asslicking group
> that cannot think on his own. Thank god
> USENET has only rarely such group morons.
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> You wouldn't notic that I speak for myself
>> always and ever. Just remove the links and
>> you see its all text original by me.
>>
>> I always post geniun commentary to current
>> events which are solely the product of my
>> own mind. I do not intend to educate something.
>>
>> My intention is to document my current
>> understanding and to generate now thinking.
>> If you have expected some schooling, I am very
>>
>> sorry for you. I never post boring schooling.
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> ---------------- cut here -----------------
>>
>> Because of the wide availability of Machine Learning
>> via Python libraries , the whole world (at least China)
>> has become a big Petri Dish that is experimenting with
>>
>> new strategies to evolve brains on the computer.
>> Recent discovery seems to be Group Preference Optimization.
>> This is when you make the chat bot, detect and react
>>
>> differently to different groups of people. It seems to
>> work on the "policy level". I don't understand it yet
>> completely. But chat bots can then evolve and use
>>
>> multiple policies automatically:
>>
>> Now it seems that it is also at the core of DeepSeekMath,
>> what is possibly detected is not group of people, but
>> mathematical topics, so that in the end it excells.
>>
>> When unsupervised learning is used groups or math
>> topics might be found from data, through a form of
>> abduction.
>>
>> ---------------- cut here -----------------
>>
>>
>> Physfitfreak schrieb:
>>> On 2/4/25 3:06 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Because of the wide availability of Machine Learning
>>>> via Python libraries , the whole world (at least China)
>>>> has become a big Petri Dish that is experimenting with
>>>>
>>>> new strategies to evolve brains on the computer.
>>>> Recent discovery seems to be Group Preference Optimization.
>>>> This is when you make the chat bot, detect and react
>>>>
>>>> differently to different groups of people. It seems to
>>>> work on the "policy level". I don't understand it yet
>>>> completely. But chat bots can then evolve and use
>>>>
>>>> multiple policies automatically:
>>>>
>>>> Group Preference Optimization
>>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11523
>>>>
>>>> DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits
>>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300
>>>>
>>>> Now it seems that it is also at the core of DeepSeekMath,
>>>> what is possibly detected is not group of people, but
>>>> mathematical topics, so that in the end it excells.
>>>>
>>>> When unsupervised learning is used groups or math
>>>> topics might be found from data, through a form of
>>>> abduction.
>>>>
>>>> Bye
>>>>
>>>> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Wait till USA figures out there is a second
>>>>> competitor besides DeepSeek, its called Yi-Lightning:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yi-Lightning Technical Report
>>>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01253
>>>>>
>>>>> It was already discussed 2 months ago:
>>>>>
>>>>> Eric Schmidt DROPS BOMBSHELL: China DOMINATES AI!
>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddWuEUjo4u4
>>>>>
>>>>> Bye
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Throwing papers at us (i.e. in usenet) although better than nothing, 
>>> it still is an extremely inefficient way to communicate.
>>>
>>> Speak, yourself, in the way that a first year undergraduate prof 
>>> explains stuff to the students who just a few months earlier finished 
>>> their high schooling.
>>>
>>> Then you will communicate.
>>>
>>> If it is too difficult to do that (cause requires deep understanding 
>>> of the subject by yourself), or, if you don't get time doing all 
>>> that, then break the job down into little pieces. A day at a time, or 
>>> a week at a time.
>>>
>>> You'd be spending the same amount of time as you are now, and yet you 
>>> will actually communicate something with those with physics background.
>>>
>>> Did I have to say this? I don't think so. But your intentions here 
>>> are vague. But if you need support for your own gains in 
>>> understanding the subject, you just have to do it the way I explained 
>>> above. Then you will get that support. Not from Bozos and 
>>> "engineers", but from me and anybody with actual physics background 
>>> and such trainings.
>>>
>>> There are a few actual physicists in relativity group that can join 
>>> in, but only if you do it the way I explained above.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891115 — Re: Group Morons and the American Dream (Was: Corr.: now -> new)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-04 23:51 +0100
SubjectRe: Group Morons and the American Dream (Was: Corr.: now -> new)
Message-ID<vnu5lo$vb6h$1@solani.org>
In reply to#891113
Hi

For DeepSeekMath I imagine the group concept:

 > - Hindu
 > - Jewish
 > - Liberal
 > - Asian

Transfers to groups such as:

- Calculus
- Group Theory
- Number Theory
- Probability Theory

Got it?

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> The biggest group morons are those that
> dream that they can profit by relocating
> from their own group of people,
> 
> to a group of american people, and then
> cry when their assets get frozen or who
> knows what happens. The papers I posted
> 
> are about automatically tuning into groups:
> 
>  > Group Preference Optimization
>  > https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11523
>  >
>  > DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits
>  > https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300
> 
> Its actually quite amazing how machine
> learning can utilize group identification
> to customize how a conversational software
> 
> agent interacts. Currently I think is a
> variant of fine tuning, but on a different
> model level that is called policy. The first
> 
> paper has a figure with the following groups:
> 
> - Hindu
> - Jewish
> - Liberal
> - Asian
> 
> Have Fun!
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Typo: now -> new
>>
>>  > to generate now thinking
>>
>> Should read:
>>
>>  > to generate new thinking
>>
>> I shit and piss on some asslicking group
>> that cannot think on his own. Thank god
>> USENET has only rarely such group morons.
>>
>> Bye
>>
>> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> You wouldn't notic that I speak for myself
>>> always and ever. Just remove the links and
>>> you see its all text original by me.
>>>
>>> I always post geniun commentary to current
>>> events which are solely the product of my
>>> own mind. I do not intend to educate something.
>>>
>>> My intention is to document my current
>>> understanding and to generate now thinking.
>>> If you have expected some schooling, I am very
>>>
>>> sorry for you. I never post boring schooling.
>>>
>>> Bye
>>>
>>> ---------------- cut here -----------------
>>>
>>> Because of the wide availability of Machine Learning
>>> via Python libraries , the whole world (at least China)
>>> has become a big Petri Dish that is experimenting with
>>>
>>> new strategies to evolve brains on the computer.
>>> Recent discovery seems to be Group Preference Optimization.
>>> This is when you make the chat bot, detect and react
>>>
>>> differently to different groups of people. It seems to
>>> work on the "policy level". I don't understand it yet
>>> completely. But chat bots can then evolve and use
>>>
>>> multiple policies automatically:
>>>
>>> Now it seems that it is also at the core of DeepSeekMath,
>>> what is possibly detected is not group of people, but
>>> mathematical topics, so that in the end it excells.
>>>
>>> When unsupervised learning is used groups or math
>>> topics might be found from data, through a form of
>>> abduction.
>>>
>>> ---------------- cut here -----------------
>>>
>>>
>>> Physfitfreak schrieb:
>>>> On 2/4/25 3:06 AM, Mild Shock wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> Because of the wide availability of Machine Learning
>>>>> via Python libraries , the whole world (at least China)
>>>>> has become a big Petri Dish that is experimenting with
>>>>>
>>>>> new strategies to evolve brains on the computer.
>>>>> Recent discovery seems to be Group Preference Optimization.
>>>>> This is when you make the chat bot, detect and react
>>>>>
>>>>> differently to different groups of people. It seems to
>>>>> work on the "policy level". I don't understand it yet
>>>>> completely. But chat bots can then evolve and use
>>>>>
>>>>> multiple policies automatically:
>>>>>
>>>>> Group Preference Optimization
>>>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.11523
>>>>>
>>>>> DeepSeekMath: Pushing the Limits
>>>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.03300
>>>>>
>>>>> Now it seems that it is also at the core of DeepSeekMath,
>>>>> what is possibly detected is not group of people, but
>>>>> mathematical topics, so that in the end it excells.
>>>>>
>>>>> When unsupervised learning is used groups or math
>>>>> topics might be found from data, through a form of
>>>>> abduction.
>>>>>
>>>>> Bye
>>>>>
>>>>> Mild Shock schrieb:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Wait till USA figures out there is a second
>>>>>> competitor besides DeepSeek, its called Yi-Lightning:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Yi-Lightning Technical Report
>>>>>> https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.01253
>>>>>>
>>>>>> It was already discussed 2 months ago:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Eric Schmidt DROPS BOMBSHELL: China DOMINATES AI!
>>>>>> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ddWuEUjo4u4
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bye
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Throwing papers at us (i.e. in usenet) although better than nothing, 
>>>> it still is an extremely inefficient way to communicate.
>>>>
>>>> Speak, yourself, in the way that a first year undergraduate prof 
>>>> explains stuff to the students who just a few months earlier 
>>>> finished their high schooling.
>>>>
>>>> Then you will communicate.
>>>>
>>>> If it is too difficult to do that (cause requires deep understanding 
>>>> of the subject by yourself), or, if you don't get time doing all 
>>>> that, then break the job down into little pieces. A day at a time, 
>>>> or a week at a time.
>>>>
>>>> You'd be spending the same amount of time as you are now, and yet 
>>>> you will actually communicate something with those with physics 
>>>> background.
>>>>
>>>> Did I have to say this? I don't think so. But your intentions here 
>>>> are vague. But if you need support for your own gains in 
>>>> understanding the subject, you just have to do it the way I 
>>>> explained above. Then you will get that support. Not from Bozos and 
>>>> "engineers", but from me and anybody with actual physics background 
>>>> and such trainings.
>>>>
>>>> There are a few actual physicists in relativity group that can join 
>>>> in, but only if you do it the way I explained above.
>>
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891117 — Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)

FromPhysfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2025-02-04 17:03 -0600
SubjectRe: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)
Message-ID<vnu6b9$v8qb$1@solani.org>
In reply to#891112
On 2/4/25 4:31 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> You wouldn't notic that I speak for myself
> always and ever. Just remove the links and
> you see its all text original by me.
> 
> I always post geniun commentary to current
> events which are solely the product of my
> own mind. I do not intend to educate something.
> 
> My intention is to document my current
> understanding and to generate now thinking.
> If you have expected some schooling, I am very
> 
> sorry for you. I never post boring schooling.
> 
> Bye


Ok. Let me see if I can conclude something from what you said.

You always go to a coffee shop or restaurant alone, and while drinking 
your coffee or after finishing your dinner, you begin thinking about the 
subjects you post here. Or perhaps reading some as well.

Is this correct?

Who doesn't want to communicate stuff he is trying to learn, with others 
with physics background? Who doesn't feel that need?

You must be an "engineer" then. "Engineers" always make that mistake 
about people with physics background. Because they do not know _hoot_ 
what a person with physics background is.

It would be like a kitchen cook trying to have conversation with a 
nutrition scientist. It doesn't happen.



[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891118 — Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)

FromPhysfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2025-02-04 17:14 -0600
SubjectRe: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)
Message-ID<vnu704$v8qb$2@solani.org>
In reply to#891117
On 2/4/25 5:03 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
> It would be like a kitchen cook trying to have conversation with a 
> nutrition scientist. It doesn't happen.


Without getting paid,that it. A cook wants to do his thing with cooking 
and get paid for it. That's all.

A physicist, on the other hand, is willing to spend time, sometimes a 
great deal of time, explaining stuff to newbies in the first semester of 
the first year of their undergraduate school.

He can do that because it isn't the money that runs him, like cooks and 
"engineers" and other types of servants who're only doing it for money. 
It is the subject itself that he loves to teach and at the same time, be 
taught, to and by the students. _Any_subject, buddy! ..

If you don't understand this, this talk is over.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891122 — Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-05 01:09 +0100
SubjectRe: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)
Message-ID<vnua6t$vdk4$3@solani.org>
In reply to#891118
Did you just use the word "newbie"?

Good Luck Clown!

Physfitfreak schrieb:
> On 2/4/25 5:03 PM, Physfitfreak wrote:
>> It would be like a kitchen cook trying to have conversation with a 
>> nutrition scientist. It doesn't happen.
> 
> 
> Without getting paid,that it. A cook wants to do his thing with cooking 
> and get paid for it. That's all.
> 
> A physicist, on the other hand, is willing to spend time, sometimes a 
> great deal of time, explaining stuff to newbies in the first semester of 
> the first year of their undergraduate school.
> 
> He can do that because it isn't the money that runs him, like cooks and 
> "engineers" and other types of servants who're only doing it for money. 
> It is the subject itself that he loves to teach and at the same time, be 
> taught, to and by the students. _Any_subject, buddy! ..
> 
> If you don't understand this, this talk is over.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891125 — Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)

FromPhysfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2025-02-04 18:23 -0600
SubjectRe: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)
Message-ID<vnub22$ubmk$2@solani.org>
In reply to#891122
On 2/4/25 6:09 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
> Did you just use the word "newbie"?
> 
> Good Luck Clown!


See, you're dumb too. By "newbie" I meant students and in this case 
people here with physics background, not you. I was assuming you're the 
teacher, we're the newbies.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891127 — Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-05 01:25 +0100
SubjectRe: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)
Message-ID<vnub5m$ve7c$2@solani.org>
In reply to#891125
Whats your idee fix with schooling.
Are you demented or what?

Physfitfreak schrieb:
> On 2/4/25 6:09 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
>> Did you just use the word "newbie"?
>>
>> Good Luck Clown!
> 
> 
> See, you're dumb too. By "newbie" I meant students and in this case 
> people here with physics background, not you. I was assuming you're the 
> teacher, we're the newbies.
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891129 — Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)

FromPhysfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2025-02-04 18:41 -0600
SubjectRe: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)
Message-ID<vnuc30$ubmk$4@solani.org>
In reply to#891127
On 2/4/25 6:25 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
> 
> Whats your idee fix with schooling.
> Are you demented or what?


What's your fear of that? Are you a fraudulent thicko? :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891132 — Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-05 01:45 +0100
SubjectRe: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)
Message-ID<vnucao$vepr$2@solani.org>
In reply to#891129
You started the red herring of ad hominem.
I only responded with another ad hominem.

But it doesn't add anything to the discussion.

Physfitfreak schrieb:
> On 2/4/25 6:25 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
>>
>> Whats your idee fix with schooling.
>> Are you demented or what?
> 
> 
> What's your fear of that? Are you a fraudulent thicko? :)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891138 — Re: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)

FromPhysfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2025-02-04 18:55 -0600
SubjectRe: I never post boring schooling (Was: How ELIZA 2.0 killed Wolfram Alpha)
Message-ID<vnucub$ubmk$9@solani.org>
In reply to#891132
On 2/4/25 6:45 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
> 
> You started the red herring of ad hominem.
> I only responded with another ad hominem.
> 
> But it doesn't add anything to the discussion.


Discussion is over. I got what I wanted. You're a fraud and I called all 
your bluffs. So go spend your time "discussing" matters with another 
Ross Finlayson like yourself.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891119 — you can suck my cock (Was: I never post boring schooling)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-05 00:14 +0100
Subjectyou can suck my cock (Was: I never post boring schooling)
Message-ID<vnu70u$vc36$1@solani.org>
In reply to#891117
Hi,

I already told you you can suck my cock:

> I shit and piss on some asslicking group
> that cannot think on his own. Thank god
> USENET has only rarely such group morons. 

But you are extremly slow thinking...

Bye

Physfitfreak schrieb:
> On 2/4/25 4:31 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> You wouldn't notic that I speak for myself
>> always and ever. Just remove the links and
>> you see its all text original by me.
>>
>> I always post geniun commentary to current
>> events which are solely the product of my
>> own mind. I do not intend to educate something.
>>
>> My intention is to document my current
>> understanding and to generate now thinking.
>> If you have expected some schooling, I am very
>>
>> sorry for you. I never post boring schooling.
>>
>> Bye
> 
> 
> Ok. Let me see if I can conclude something from what you said.
> 
> You always go to a coffee shop or restaurant alone, and while drinking 
> your coffee or after finishing your dinner, you begin thinking about the 
> subjects you post here. Or perhaps reading some as well.
> 
> Is this correct?
> 
> Who doesn't want to communicate stuff he is trying to learn, with others 
> with physics background? Who doesn't feel that need?
> 
> You must be an "engineer" then. "Engineers" always make that mistake 
> about people with physics background. Because they do not know _hoot_ 
> what a person with physics background is.
> 
> It would be like a kitchen cook trying to have conversation with a 
> nutrition scientist. It doesn't happen.
> 
> 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891123 — Re: you can suck my cock (Was: I never post boring schooling)

FromPhysfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2025-02-04 18:12 -0600
SubjectRe: you can suck my cock (Was: I never post boring schooling)
Message-ID<vnuae6$ubmk$1@solani.org>
In reply to#891119
On 2/4/25 5:14 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I already told you you can suck my cock:


Huh.., ok, so you're a fraud.

Do not throw papers at us here! I don't believe you understand them.

My asking you to be more genuine and open about learning those stuff 
scared you enough to react like ... yes, like a fraud :) You think you 
can fool me?

Not only that, almost anything about you is deranged, down to how you 
form your paragraphs. You're probably a sick poppy. You've probably been 
here under other aliases, and each time I kicked your sick ass hard.

Solution for you: Post your blabber to the relativity group only; 
somebody there might believe that you actually know something. Cause 
here I'll call your bluff.





[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891124 — physics was interesting 100 years ago (Was: you can suck my cock)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-05 01:21 +0100
Subjectphysics was interesting 100 years ago (Was: you can suck my cock)
Message-ID<vnuato$ve1t$1@solani.org>
In reply to#891123
Hi,

I only post in sci.physics because some
peer had the idea that machine learning doesn't
work based on theories of physics, like

entropy, thermodynamics, ... so whats going
on in machine learning from a physical point
of view? Normaly I mainly post in sci.logic.

I have a deep detest of physics, I only passed
my highschool physic because it involved math,
but the physics teacher didn't notice,

he even used me when an inspector came into
the school, to demonstate that he has good
pupils. I played the game although I don't

believe that physics has a lot to offer.
It was interesting 100 years ago.

Bye

P.S.: Physics has a little revival in some
AI related fields like genrative AI. You might
find ideas like wave function collapes,

but its quite different from the models that
try to match nature. AI mostly uses adaptation
and inspiration from physics, not physics itself.

Physfitfreak schrieb:
> On 2/4/25 5:14 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I already told you you can suck my cock:
> 
> 
> Huh.., ok, so you're a fraud.
> 
> Do not throw papers at us here! I don't believe you understand them.
> 
> My asking you to be more genuine and open about learning those stuff 
> scared you enough to react like ... yes, like a fraud :) You think you 
> can fool me?
> 
> Not only that, almost anything about you is deranged, down to how you 
> form your paragraphs. You're probably a sick poppy. You've probably been 
> here under other aliases, and each time I kicked your sick ass hard.
> 
> Solution for you: Post your blabber to the relativity group only; 
> somebody there might believe that you actually know something. Cause 
> here I'll call your bluff.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891126 — Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-05 01:24 +0100
SubjectElon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)
Message-ID<vnub3q$ve7c$1@solani.org>
In reply to#891124
Hi,

But obviously readers of sci.physics like
Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> are stupid
as fuck. Cannot relate AI to physics.

Expect me to do some schooling. Whats wrong?
Maybe a statistical outlier, I remember people
were more smart on USENET. Or a general trend

that we are converging to Idiocracy:

Idiocracy Electrolytes 1
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZMHfBobgLSI

Now USA has a budget crisis, and Elon Musk
bought the governement?

LoL

Bye

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> I only post in sci.physics because some
> peer had the idea that machine learning doesn't
> work based on theories of physics, like
> 
> entropy, thermodynamics, ... so whats going
> on in machine learning from a physical point
> of view? Normaly I mainly post in sci.logic.
> 
> I have a deep detest of physics, I only passed
> my highschool physic because it involved math,
> but the physics teacher didn't notice,
> 
> he even used me when an inspector came into
> the school, to demonstate that he has good
> pupils. I played the game although I don't
> 
> believe that physics has a lot to offer.
> It was interesting 100 years ago.
> 
> Bye
> 
> P.S.: Physics has a little revival in some
> AI related fields like genrative AI. You might
> find ideas like wave function collapes,
> 
> but its quite different from the models that
> try to match nature. AI mostly uses adaptation
> and inspiration from physics, not physics itself.
> 
> Physfitfreak schrieb:
>> On 2/4/25 5:14 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I already told you you can suck my cock:
>>
>>
>> Huh.., ok, so you're a fraud.
>>
>> Do not throw papers at us here! I don't believe you understand them.
>>
>> My asking you to be more genuine and open about learning those stuff 
>> scared you enough to react like ... yes, like a fraud :) You think you 
>> can fool me?
>>
>> Not only that, almost anything about you is deranged, down to how you 
>> form your paragraphs. You're probably a sick poppy. You've probably 
>> been here under other aliases, and each time I kicked your sick ass hard.
>>
>> Solution for you: Post your blabber to the relativity group only; 
>> somebody there might believe that you actually know something. Cause 
>> here I'll call your bluff.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891131 — Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)

FromPhysfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2025-02-04 18:44 -0600
SubjectRe: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)
Message-ID<vnuc8s$ubmk$5@solani.org>
In reply to#891126
On 2/4/25 6:24 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
> i,
> 
> But obviously readers of sci.physics like
> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> are stupid
> as fuck. Cannot relate AI to physics.


Did you try that and didn't see I could relate? No. You just packed and 
ran away as soon as I came forward to discuss it with you. You're a fraud.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891133 — Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-05 01:46 +0100
SubjectRe: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)
Message-ID<vnuccr$vepr$3@solani.org>
In reply to#891131

Proof that you cannot relate is here:

 > Throwing papers at us (i.e. in usenet) although
 > better than nothing, it still is an extremely
 > inefficient way to communicate.

I think papers are extremly efficent. What do
you expect me to read the paper for you?

Physfitfreak schrieb:
> On 2/4/25 6:24 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
>> i,
>>
>> But obviously readers of sci.physics like
>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> are stupid
>> as fuck. Cannot relate AI to physics.
> 
> 
> Did you try that and didn't see I could relate? No. You just packed and 
> ran away as soon as I came forward to discuss it with you. You're a fraud.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891134 — Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-05 01:47 +0100
SubjectRe: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)
Message-ID<vnucee$vepr$4@solani.org>
In reply to#891133
This is my last ad hominem. But
you make it really easy for me:

You are a moron that cannot read (papers).

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Proof that you cannot relate is here:
> 
>  > Throwing papers at us (i.e. in usenet) although
>  > better than nothing, it still is an extremely
>  > inefficient way to communicate.
> 
> I think papers are extremly efficent. What do
> you expect me to read the paper for you?
> 
> Physfitfreak schrieb:
>> On 2/4/25 6:24 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
>>> i,
>>>
>>> But obviously readers of sci.physics like
>>> Physfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com> are stupid
>>> as fuck. Cannot relate AI to physics.
>>
>>
>> Did you try that and didn't see I could relate? No. You just packed 
>> and ran away as soon as I came forward to discuss it with you. You're 
>> a fraud.
> 

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891137 — Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)

FromPhysfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2025-02-04 18:54 -0600
SubjectRe: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)
Message-ID<vnucrd$ubmk$8@solani.org>
In reply to#891134
On 2/4/25 6:47 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
> 
> This is my last ad hominem. But
> you make it really easy for me:
> 
> You are a moron that cannot read (papers).


Newbies aren't morons. You are.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891140 — Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)

FromMild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Date2025-02-05 01:56 +0100
SubjectRe: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)
Message-ID<vnud0q$vf56$2@solani.org>
In reply to#891137
You can call me what ever you want.
fraud, fraudulent thicko, fucked up mind

Just late the hate flow through you.
Feel the Dark side of the Force:

The Dark Side Of The Force Is A Pathway
To Many Abilities Some Consider To Be Unnatural
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqcSXt1CQOQ

It is quite entertaining, to say the least...

Physfitfreak schrieb:
> On 2/4/25 6:47 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
>>
>> This is my last ad hominem. But
>> you make it really easy for me:
>>
>> You are a moron that cannot read (papers).
> 
> 
> Newbies aren't morons. You are.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#891136 — Re: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)

FromPhysfitfreak <physfitfreak@gmail.com>
Date2025-02-04 18:52 -0600
SubjectRe: Elon Musk bought the governement? (Was: physics was interesting 100 years ago)
Message-ID<vnuco8$ubmk$7@solani.org>
In reply to#891133
On 2/4/25 6:46 PM, Mild Shock wrote:
> 
> 
> Proof that you cannot relate is here:
> 
>  > Throwing papers at us (i.e. in usenet) although
>  > better than nothing, it still is an extremely
>  > inefficient way to communicate.
> 
> I think papers are extremly efficent. What do
> you expect me to read the paper for you?


Only a fraud throws papers at "newbies." I've called your bluff. Live 
with it now.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 3 of 6 — ← Prev page 1 2 [3] 4 5 6  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | sci.physics


csiph-web